It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by moebius
You believe I know nothing about Physics eh? Let me ask you a question...there is a minimum and a maximum numerical number that Quarks must never exceed or be in a lessor number within a Proton or Neutron. What are those numbers both the Minimum and Maximum...and where do you believe the Quarks are going as they blink in and out of existence within a Proton or Neutron as they can numerically exist at quantities at both minimum or maximum as well as in between?
Also...provide an answer of what happens to the Gluons when Quarks blink in and out of existence as well as what happens to the Hadrons that are bound to Quarks by those Gluons.
And if you can...tell me what type of Vector Boson a Gluon is?
Split Infinity
I will pin point exactly where you are confusing the issue...in your Reply you used the word...PUSHES...as well as the word...TOWARDS. I will explain each words use as you see it and what the Reality of what is occurring truly is in your question.
I don't get why you view the center as a point to which all of Earth's Gravity pushes towards?
Originally posted by renegadeloser
reply to post by moebius
Interestingly, Michael Faraday, one of the most important physicists ever, had almost no knowledge of, or ability in math. Being considered one of the best experimental physicist of all time. He discovered the faraday cage, the transformer, the electric generator. He discovered that a charge in motion gives rise to a magnetic field at 90 degrees to that motion. He was the first to postulate an electric or magnetic field, and the first to describe all of the lines of force around a magnet.
Couldn't do math, not even simple trigonometry.
Btw this is coming from a man who has passed math courses in calculus, discrete mathematics, and differential equations.edit on 28-10-2012 by renegadeloser because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Mikado
I went and reread the first page of this thread.
I see some confusion between mass and weight. One is scalar and one is vectorial.
There is confusion over drag, thus the vacuum to eliminate it. If anyone here has college physics under their belt then they would know that "freefall experiments" are conducted in a vacuum. Therefore, the initial hypothesis from the original poster had the object in a vacuum since it is essentially a freefall experiment.
This argument has been going on, in some manner, since Aristoteles.
Mikado
Originally posted by spy66
The 10 kg mass doesn't have any mass underneath it self.
If the mass should sink by it self.
How would the mass know which way to sink?
When there is equal pressure in both ends?
The mass would not know where it should sink.
Originally posted by spy66
This is not a free fall experiment. The 10kg mass was not dropped it was just placed inside the vacuum tunnel.
The 10 kg mass doesn't have any mass underneath it self. Because the vacuum tunnel goes through the center of earth and out on the other end. Earth is isolated from the vacuum by the walls of the tunnel.
What some people in here don't understand is the difference between a closed system and a open system. This experiment can not be looked upon as if it was a open system.
If the mass should sink by it self. The vacuum inside the tunnel must gain weight towards the center. But it doesn't. It is vacuum all the way to the other end. How would the mass know which way to sink? When there is equal pressure in both ends? The mass would not know where it should sink.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by chr0naut
You are guessing as Special Effects that are most likely present in a Celestial Bodies Gravity Well have Relativistic and Physics Busting changing of Potential Kinetic Energy of a falling Object.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by spy66
This is not a free fall experiment. The 10kg mass was not dropped it was just placed inside the vacuum tunnel.
The 10 kg mass doesn't have any mass underneath it self. Because the vacuum tunnel goes through the center of earth and out on the other end. Earth is isolated from the vacuum by the walls of the tunnel.
What some people in here don't understand is the difference between a closed system and a open system. This experiment can not be looked upon as if it was a open system.
If the mass should sink by it self. The vacuum inside the tunnel must gain weight towards the center. But it doesn't. It is vacuum all the way to the other end. How would the mass know which way to sink? When there is equal pressure in both ends? The mass would not know where it should sink.
There is no gravity inside the tunnel. Earths gravity is isolated by the tunnel. It does not effect the 10kg mass.