November 5, the day before the US Presidential elections will be the third anniversary of the massacre of 13 US soldiers at Ft. Hood by Islamic
terrorist, US Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan.
The Obama administration has refused to acknowledged that the attack was a terrorist attack. The Defense Department has insisted on covering up the
nature of the attack. The reports it released following the attack failed to mention Hasan's Islamic motivations. Still today the Defense Department
insists on defining the massacre as a case of "workplace violence."
To advance this fiction, the Defense Department has refused to award Purple Hearts to the families of the soldiers murdered by Hasan, or to those who
were wounded in his attack. It has refused to compensate the families of those murdered or the survivors who were incapacitated at the level the US
military compensates the families of soldiers killed in the line of duty and soldiers wounded by enemy fire.
This year Congress tried to rectify this obscenity by including Purple Heart citations for Ft. Hood casualties in the Defense Appropriations Act.
Obama said he would veto the bill, (and thus deny the military funding), if they didn't remove the clause about the medals. That is how far Obama is
willing to go to keep up this fiction, cover up the existence of enemy forces within the US military, deny the threat posed to the US by radical
Islam, and in the process, punish and dishonor American soldiers who were killed in the line of duty in an act of war against the US by a
self-proclaimed "Soldier of Allah."
There is no precedent in US history for this sort of behavior by an American president. None.
Watch the video below, with testimony from the victims of the attack. It was produced by the Coalition for Ft. Hood Heroes. And think about them, and
the commander in chief who refuses for ideological reasons to recognize what happened that day, and so dishonors them every single day.
Think about four more years of this reckless behavior if he is reelected the day after the third anniversary of the massacre, and then share this
video with everyone you know.
Initial reports of secondary shooters, over seventy bullets fired, Nassan looking cheerful in the convenient store surveillance video, the list goes
on and on. The entire thing was on a military base, yet a female local police officer stopped the massacre. Thanks DHS, your billions of dollars of
security was upstaged by a young lady.
Isn't EVERY premeditated shooting a "terrorist act"? They need to determine if he was connected to any terror group - or as the evidence suggests,
was a lone nut with an apparent vendetta against the US or the military. I'm all for labeling it an act of terrorism, but not because the shooter is
a Muslim. Wade Michael Philips (the soldier in Afghanistan) committed an even more heinous act and is a Christian, instead of shooting up his fellow
soldiers he shot up civilian women and children in their beds - was he labeled a terrorist? Don't make it a double standard - 'he's a Muslim, thus
any act of violence from him makes his a terrorist'.
They need to determine if he was connected to any terror group - or as the evidence suggests, was a lone nut with an apparent vendetta against the US
or the military.
Being involved in communications with the current leader of Al Qaeda isn't enough evidence?! The fact that he even maintained communications with
such a high standing figure - was even able to peruse Islamist terrorist sites, without even being discovered - or rather, bothered - by the military,
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.