Exclusive: The scientists who turned fresh air into petrol

page: 4
25
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 21 2012 @ 08:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by Miccey
 


I am asking you what is free about it? The NaOH, the electricity for the hydrolysis... what exactly? Enlighten me...


WTF, You ARE trolling, please tell me..
How in petes name do you get anything "FREE"
from my posts...

We need to get the IGNORE system back guys...

Oh my...
Either you are trolling me OR you actually dont understand what im asking...
If you dont understand please forgive me..

I really wanna KNOW how much i would cost to produce
1 Liter gfas with this method..On a DOWNSCALED version...

An HONEST question...


NOTHING FREE HERE




posted on Oct, 22 2012 @ 02:51 PM
link   
How long before we never hear about this again?

Government won't have this... there's no way to control us with free energy.
Same reason Tesla was blacklisted.



posted on Oct, 22 2012 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by DeReK DaRkLy

How long before we never hear about this again?

Government won't have this... there's no way to control us with free energy.
Same reason Tesla was blacklisted.


Theres nothing free about it. Its just another way to obtain petrol as opposed to digging it up. It still requires energy to produce it.

At some point as the natural stuff gets harder to get at it'll become cost effective to make it.

This could be the future of big oil rather than the end of it. If BP make petrol in the desert by using a solar powered manufacturing plant they will still charge you for it.



posted on Oct, 22 2012 @ 03:28 PM
link   
reply to post by justwokeup
 




Theres nothing free about it. Its just another way to obtain petrol as opposed to digging it up. It still requires energy to produce it.


It either requires more energy to make it than you get out of it, or less...

If the answer is that it requires more, then it's useless.
If the answer is less, then it should amount to endless energy.



posted on Oct, 22 2012 @ 04:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by DeReK DaRkLy
reply to post by justwokeup
 




Theres nothing free about it. Its just another way to obtain petrol as opposed to digging it up. It still requires energy to produce it.


It either requires more energy to make it than you get out of it, or less...

If the answer is that it requires more, then it's useless.
If the answer is less, then it should amount to endless energy.


Its the former, but its not useless.

What it does is allow you to convert the energy you can generate with large power plant (whether it be solar, fission, hydro-electric, wind etc) into petrol that you can put in a vehicle.

Its not free, but neither is it useless.



posted on Oct, 22 2012 @ 04:45 PM
link   
i work at a chemical plant where we removed CO2 from stack gas from the power plant to use in there process,

we used monoethanolamine (MEA) to absorbed the CO2 and by heating the MEA released the CO2.
www.zero.no...

Once you have the CO2 that is the big part of the problem.

You would be able to make fuel from the stack gases of any coal.or natural gas. power plant.

and the more fuel on the market the lower the cost. Supply and Demand



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by justwokeup
 




What it does is allow you to convert the energy you can generate with large power plant (whether it be solar, fission, hydro-electric, wind etc) into petrol that you can put in a vehicle.


Seems like that would drive up the cost of electricity for everyone.





new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join