I think there is nothing wrong in calling a dark skined person black, and a light skinned person white, as you are simply referring to their physical
appearance. by using the words in that sense you are not inferring any sort of racial intentions.
But if we are going to have African-Americans, doesn't that mean every person on this planet should follow their roots so they can be referred to by
the right name?
Does that make me Italo-british-irish-(insert pretty much every other country in the world here)-australian? If we're going to be PC and all.....
No wait, isn't referring to someone by their country forcing a label therefore stereotyping them? so umm...hmmm. I'm stumped. What do I called
someone who lives in America? A human? No wait, human implies a certain stereotype as well..umm....how about living being. Dammit, according to the
definition of "living" that implies that I am a carbon based lifeform, so once again I'm sterotyping....
I could refer to the American as an "it", but then I'm implying that the american is below me...thus, the logical conclusion is we have to abandon
all forms of spoken language because it only promotes racism.

oh, and eyes, we all need to carve out our eyes because we judge people by their
appearance