posted on Oct, 19 2012 @ 02:05 PM
So the guy who doesn't bother carefully reading the initial post and can't tell the difference between Martin and Charlie Sheen thinks that a simple
google search will turn up all the 'truther' debunking necessary...?? Forget the implication that the opposite of 'truther' is 'liar'...
After hundreds of hours of research which included studying the only photographs allowed of the 'pile' during the months' long cleanup, (hint:
it's not what you see, it's what you don't see, thousands of desks, chairs, computers, room dividers, toilets and coke machines should be seen in
the pile, crushed but recognizable; they are not); listening to all the finally-released fire and police tapes, as well as the FAA tapes of that day,
and watching over and over again the collapse of the buildings, along with a lot of research into what's available in present nuclear technology, I
was forced to come to the conclusion that the buildings were collapsed with very small tactical nukes placed probably on every other floor and
detonated by remote control in sequence. These weapons are available for any yield and (low) radiation signature that is desired, can be made small
enough to hide in a potted plant, and would look exactly like what the films of that day show. No other conclusion, barring weapons so secret we have
no information about them, can be supported if the evidence is looked at honestly.
This evidence includes the sustained heat in the basement levels for months afterwards (residual fission, like in Fukushima today) in spite of
millions of gallons of water being poured on the 'fire', heat far beyond what regular kerosene and building-content fire can produce.
Look at the videos of the buildings in mid-collapse; the aluminum cladding and exterior beams are being blown outwards with extreme power and velocity
(not possible with any form of gravity collapse); the concrete floor pans and office contents are being turned to a pyroclastic flow of dust
instantaneously, and the massive inner core of steel is that black cloud, vaguely mushroom-shaped, that you see wafting upwards. The 'spire' is
more proof; it turns into dust slower than the rest of the frame of the building, showing the molecular disintegration in almost slow-motion. The
only weapon we the public are allowed to know about that can cause this effect is nuclear fission.
I sincerely encourage anyone who has the money and political wherewithal to demand a new investigation and wish this movie success; but the truthers
who insist it was all done with thermite are also disinfo-agents, if unwittingly (thermite may have been used in the basement in some of the initial
beam-weakening attempts, but the bomb that went off in the basement as described by the janitor was also a nuke, it crumpled a huge elevator door like
tin foil and 'disappeared' a massive press in the basement, and caused 'hanging skin' in a victim nearby, as described after Hiroshima.
Try to wrap your mind around it, all you debunkers. New York City was nuked and it wasn't by Bin Laden. Calling people names who want to get to the
truth and find out once and for all who was responsible (certainly not the people of Iraq or Afghanistan) would be one small step to discovering where
the evil really resides.
Sorry if some people can't handle the truth, or even attempts to learn the truth; you may want to work on your cognitive dissonance issues.