[HOAX]EBE R611R the truth ITS BACK[HOAX]

page: 8
28
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 05:24 PM
link   
[img]http://www.google.co.uk...:&imgrefurl=http://migasn et03irfai057.blogspot.com/2009_04_01_archive.html&docid=koYMw0ETvPpirM&imgurl=http://www.soton.ac.uk/~imw/jpg-Oil-South/9OS-Wytch-Farm-Poole-Harbour-l ab.jpg&w=1250&h=879&ei=OhmHUIXrIcLU0QXdjIGgBA&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=177&vpy=154&dur=190&hovh=188&hovw=268&tx=158&ty=90&sig=111625270890446926854&page=1&t bnh=141&tbnw=185&start=0&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0,i:69[/img]
edit on 23-10-2012 by stevejenks because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 05:41 PM
link   
reply to post by stevejenks
 


The boys at Langley got to him



posted on Oct, 23 2012 @ 05:43 PM
link   
OP you mean this one??

It's real creature 'alright' rofl.
edit on 23-10-2012 by Imtor because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 11:43 AM
link   
Ok op get ready.

edit on 24-10-2012 by stevejenks because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 11:54 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 11:58 AM
link   
Great stuff!
In the thread-Special Olympics, this one would be unfit to compete



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 11:58 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 07:31 PM
link   
Can someone fill me in on what exactly happened here and why TC was banned? While his claims were most assuredly dubious and worthy of immense skepticism, I likewise see no compelling proof - at least publicly published in this topic - that he was deliberately hoaxing the site. That's certainly a possibility of course, and has happened myriad times before. As I tried to tell TC in my post earlier herein, the skepticism he was facing was a reflection of that long history of deceit more than anything else.

But why was he actually banned and this topic labeled a definitive hoax? Was there some outside or private information we are not seeing? Did the admins see him posting elsewhere or something demonstrating that he was being intentionally misleading?

Just asking for clarification. My skepticism runs both ways - aka the true definition of the benefit of the doubt - so I do not like to simply accept accusations of hoaxing at face value without evidence.

Thanks. Peace.



posted on Oct, 24 2012 @ 08:46 PM
link   
Man did you go and create another account to reply on your thread?

Oh yeah, you got banned so I guess that I will not be getting a reply.

Shame because your story was entertaining regardless if it were true or not.

Oh well,

Another one bites the dust. Rest in peace. Something tells me that you will be back though.





new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 5  6  7   >>

log in

join