It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IsaacKoi
If you are really interested, there is a fairly lengthy Crown Prosecution Service evaluation (dated 26 February 2009) of the evidence at the link below:
cdn.ttgtmedia.com...
A summary of the evidence appears on the third page. (The first page is blank).
The Crown Prosecution Service document concluded that the evidence available at that time was insufficient to prosecute Gary McKinnon.
Hope this helps.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by something wicked
You are missing the point. If he saw an image it was viewable on his screen. If it's viewable on his screen then you can take a screengrab in a fraction of a second.
Do know know anything about the capabilities of his computer?
Was it capable of a screen grab?
Windows XP was released worldwide for retail sale on October 25, 2001 and McKinnon was busted 2002 so its very likely he was using Win 98 or Win ME. Niether of those OS's have screen grab software and as far as I know XP doesnt either. They MAY have had the Print Screen command but that requires a printer.
Also, back then hackers would turn OFF all services they didn't require, print services would likely be one of them.
Also, if YOU were the hacker, would YOU have kept evidence of YOUR crime on YOUR computer?
Sorry but I think its YOU who is missing the point.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
reply to post by something wicked
Did you miss this part of my post?
Also, back then hackers would turn OFF all services they didn't require, print services would likely be one of them
or this part
Also, if YOU were the hacker, would YOU have kept evidence of YOUR crime on YOUR computer?
Are you incapable of replying without being so insulting?edit on 20-10-2012 by VoidHawk because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MDDoxs
Probability suggests that it is likely other life exists out in our universe, however the same probabilities can be used to suggest that the chances of them visiting us is very improbable at this time.
Originally posted by Argyll
The problem I have with Gary McKinnon is he claims that he came across many other hackers infiltrating the same networks he was hacking into, and from countries all over the world, bearing in mind that he claims to have been hacking these networks for a couple of years at least, then it would be safe to assume that other people from all over the world had been doing so as well, and it would also be safe to assume that some of those hackers at least would have been a lot better at hacking than McKinnon......why has nobody else come forward with any evidence of what he claimed to have found?
GM: Yeah, you could look at it like, that because I'm sure... I mean, the other connections that were there - Turkey, Holland, Germany, all across the world - you could see the IP addresses that connected to the machine and you could look it up and find out which country they're in and even which businesses own the IPs. And I don't know whether that was foreign governments. It could have been Al Qaeda. It could have been someone else just like me, just snooping around. Who knows?
Source
Originally posted by texasgirl
Why haven't we gone back to the moon since 1972?
Originally posted by something wicked
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by something wicked
You are missing the point. If he saw an image it was viewable on his screen. If it's viewable on his screen then you can take a screengrab in a fraction of a second.
Do know know anything about the capabilities of his computer?
Was it capable of a screen grab?
Windows XP was released worldwide for retail sale on October 25, 2001 and McKinnon was busted 2002 so its very likely he was using Win 98 or Win ME. Niether of those OS's have screen grab software and as far as I know XP doesnt either. They MAY have had the Print Screen command but that requires a printer.
Also, back then hackers would turn OFF all services they didn't require, print services would likely be one of them.
Also, if YOU were the hacker, would YOU have kept evidence of YOUR crime on YOUR computer?
Sorry but I think its YOU who is missing the point.
It's inherent in Windows and had been for years prior to 2001 - you should check these points before making your statement. XP does, I have a computer running XP. Windows 98 did, I used it for screengrabs for work purposes in the late 90's. You are making assumptions that you are then calling facts.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by Joneselius
Gary Mckinnon the British citizen who hacked into NASA and secure military files has come out and accused the agencies of covering up aliens existence. He claims that the military has files with photographs of the craft these 'off world security forces' have been using and their names. Bear in mind it's incredibly hard for people with Aspbergers syndrome to lie!
Though he's not the most secure source of information, he clearly has some faculties if he's able to hack into top security military computers causing 'millions' in damage. It might be why the US government want him so badly!
snip
There is no evidence and the source for the claims is questionable. Trust me, if Gary is correct the U.S. gov't would have sent a death squad to out him. When we get more than hearsay, then it still has to pass scrutiny.
Originally posted by razorman
If this hacker has seen anything even remotely alien or had gained access to some super secret stuff, you would not even know his name because he would already be dead.
Originally posted by Just Chris
Originally posted by razorman
If this hacker has seen anything even remotely alien or had gained access to some super secret stuff, you would not even know his name because he would already be dead.
Read what I posted above you....
Originally posted by TheOneElectric
Every single time I try to believe, I get burned.
Is it worth it in the long run?
British hacker says aliens exist
Originally posted by Harte
British hacker says aliens exist
American Slacker (me) says aliens don't exist.
Harte
Originally posted by razorman
I don't think you understand what I mean. Lets say this dude gained access to something important. He would have been tracked down within days. So you would not know his name, he would have never even had time to get to the media. Believe me, things of such great importance will not be handled in the public sphere with lawyers and media. If a death squad was on the way, it would have been within days of the hacking incident and no one in the world will know this guy even existed. Get my drift?
Originally posted by Just Chris
Originally posted by razorman
If this hacker has seen anything even remotely alien or had gained access to some super secret stuff, you would not even know his name because he would already be dead.
Read what I posted above you....
Originally posted by K-PAX-PROT
Originally posted by Harte
British hacker says aliens exist
American Slacker (me) says aliens don't exist.
Harte
prove it
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.