It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Considering he only ever attended 3 Masonic meetings, the 3 where he got his degrees, I would say his interest in Freemasonry was pretty lackluster.
Originally posted by hotel1
Peter Sellers was a Freemason who had an avid interest in all manner of occult subjects. Like a lot of unusually talented people he also had a fairly well developed quirky side.
Originally posted by PrplHrt
reply to post by Dustytoad
You haven't seen what I've seen. Don't be so quick to judge others.
There is truth to the hidden hand.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Considering he only ever attended 3 Masonic meetings, the 3 where he got his degrees, I would say his interest in Freemasonry was pretty lackluster.
Originally posted by hotel1
Peter Sellers was a Freemason who had an avid interest in all manner of occult subjects. Like a lot of unusually talented people he also had a fairly well developed quirky side.
source
Originally posted by AuranVector
Ayn Rand was not related to "the same people behind the RAND corp."
Ayn Rand was a Russian Jewess who saw firsthand what happened to Russia when the Communists took over. It was her life's mission to warn people about Communism. Rand was not her birth name nor her husband's name.
RAND is an acronym taken from the words "Research ANd Development" -- it's a nonprofit think tank.edit on 19-10-2012 by AuranVector because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wertdagf
The all seeing eye means that god loves to give children cancer.
Take a walk through a childrens terminal illness ward and youll see gods plan alot clearer. Without the innocent children that he makes suffer and die in their parents arms their faith would surely wither away and lead them to hell.
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
Just strange... I posted a real conspiracy and I get 1 flag? I mean this is a real conspiracy?
Originally posted by PrplHrt
reply to post by Dustytoad
I'm not stuck in God mode. I don't fear either side, but I do keep an eye on the dark. It is tempting to many.
It's more because the "general public" don't give a rip about their real rights, responsibilities, and standing before the Creator. They are more interested in "benefits" based in a fictional system based in legal positivism which makes man a god to man. Most are unaware that this breaks rule One, but ignorance of the law is no excuse. They are handed over to their wardens through their own ignorance. Even, and especially, very religious people. Benefits from "god" (in the form of promises for a better afterlife delivered by a MAN) or benefits from the government (in the form of fiat currency; promises for a better life in the here and now, delivered by a MAN), all those people are cattle. Malala Yousufzai, now she's another story altogether. They (the religious-control side) haven't been allowed to kill her, even though she was shot at point-blank. The end of the Male-Dominator paradigm is upon us.
Originally posted by UncleMikey
reply to post by Deaf Alien
Sometimes I think they believe it's their 'right' to do whatever they want to us because we (the general public) don't 'get it' like they do.
Originally posted by Dustytoad
[...]
The dark isn't tempting to that many who have felt the ALL that IS.
Originally posted by seamus
Originally posted by Dustytoad
[...]
The dark isn't tempting to that many who have felt the ALL that IS.
Felt I had to add (not disagreeing at all)...
And neither is is a fearful thing. It is merely part of ALL that IS.
So much fear is so much energy wasted. What you fear, you give power over you.
Originally posted by MightyWizard
The gardener plays the whole movie as a slow minded man. What means at the end when the gardener walks over water and don’t sink ?