BHObama PERSONALLY Arranged Benghazi Trip That Resulted In Murder Of US AMB Chris Stevens and others

page: 1
37
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
+13 more 
posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   
This is the only account that makes any sense of all the lies spewed forth by the BHO administration -- This story unravels the web of conspiratorial deceit that surrounds the entire Obama staff who continually spread the propaganda lies regarding the video. It explains the whys and wherefors regarding Chris Stevens fears and why he felt such a sense of urgency for his own safety - why he was so frightened and calling for help, and it explains why help was denied, and it shows why the Al-Qaida terrorists knew exactly where Chris Stevens was and how to hunt him down for the kill.

LARRY SINCLAIR LINK TO STORY BREAKING NEWS: Obama Arranged Benghazi Trip That Resulted In Murder Of US AMB Chris StevensOctober 17, 2012
By Lawrence Sinclair

September 11, 2012 U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods were murdered on the 11th anniversary of Sept. 11. From the very beginning the Obama White House with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by Obama’s side took to the media claiming that the torture, rape and murder of the first United States Ambassador since 1979 was the result of some obscure YouTube video (that from its uploading on July 2, 2012 to September 10, 2012 had all of 17 views) mocking the prophet Muhammad.
Thirty-five days later we are still allowing the media and the Obama Administration to hide the truth and continue in their deliberately reporting information they KNOW to be untrue while refusing to address these facts which come from US State Department and Obama White House sources.
Deroy Murdock: Benghazi’s inconvenient truths

AMB Chris Stevens was NOT surprised by his killers in Benghazi, Libya as has been portrayed thus far. According to sources in the State Department Chris Stevens was in Benghazi, Libya at the specific instruction of the Obama White House to recover weapons that the U.S. supplied to Libya rebels in the over throw of Gaddafi. These sources who work in the State Department and the Obama White House say that Barack Obama was directly involved in negotiations with Libyan Rebels in an effort to recover weapons that the U.S. supplied them. Sources say that the arrangements were made between Barack Obama direct talks and that the White House directly arranged for AMB Stevens to travel to Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012 and it was by direction of Barack Obama that Stevens was to meet with the very individuals who tortured, raped and murdered him.
These same sources state that the YouTube video which was put out by the White House and was reported by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as being responsible for the Benghazi attack; had been taken by the Obama administration even before the September 11, 2012 murders for the specific intent to blame it in the event the Obama arranged weapons recovery went awry.
We can continue to play the word games all we want over who denied the request for additional security; or when did Obama or Clinton know that the Benghazi Consulate was “attacked,” but to do so is not going to bring about the truth.

The truth is clear:
1. Barack Obama personally and directly arranged for AMB Chris Stevens to travel to Benghazi, Libya for the express purpose of meeting with individuals who Barack Obama directly negotiated with in an effort to recover US Supplied weapons.
2. AMB Chris Stevens was not ambushed because of a leak in the Libyan security as is being claimed. Chris Stevens where-a-bouts in Benghazi were determined and relayed by the Obama White House in their arranging this meeting in the first place.
3. Hillary Clinton knows that AMB Stevens was sent to Benghazi on the express direction of Barack Obama and she knew the anti-Islam YouTube video had already been picked to be used as a diversion if the weapons recovery failed.
4. With our deepest sympathy and respect to the families of Chris Stevens; Sean Smith; and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods we ask if they are entitled to the truth and if AMB Stevens father might have a different position if Hillary Clinton were to tell him the truth about how & why his son was sent to meet with the very individuals who killed him?
Memorial Service For Slain U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens in San Francisco
His family doesn’t want the ambassador’s memory to become political football
5. The fact that AMB Stevens was sent to meet with the very people he had warned the Obama administration had him on a hit list is inexcusable and the truth must be told.


The continued back and forth as to when one side called it a terrorists attack or blamed some YouTube video (which now thanks to Obama has millions of views) is not going to address the truth of what really happened. Yes it was Islamic terrorists who killed these four Americans, but it was President Barack Obama who arranged to have these four Americans delivered to their very killers. That’s the horrific truth that no one seems to want to acknowledge!

Editors Note: Sinclair News has agreed to withhold the names of sources within the US State Dept and the Obama White House who provided us information concerning the Benghazi murders and the Obama arranged weapons recovery meeting which sent these four Americans to be executed
edit on 18-10-2012 by Vitruvian because: text




posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 08:54 AM
link   
TIMELINE
Sept. 11: Despite anti-video demonstrations in Cairo, Benghazi is tranquil. According to U.S. diplomats, “everything is calm. There’s nothing unusual. There has been nothing unusual during the day at all outside. No protests all day.”
At 9:40 p.m. local time, however, gunfire and explosions rock the consulate.

Sept. 12: As these homicides become clear, Obama says, “We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, but there is absolutely no justification for this type of senseless violence. None.” Obama then skips his daily intelligence briefing and jets to a Las Vegas fundraiser.

Sept. 13: “The United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declares. “We absolutely reject its content and message.”

Sept. 14: “The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney announces.
That day, as the murdered Americans’ remains reach Andrews Air Force Base, Clinton says: “We have seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

Sept. 16: United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice calls the violence “a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video.”

Sept. 18: Obama tells comedian David Letterman that he rejects the “extremely offensive video directed at Mohammed and Islam.” Obama adds that “extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies, including the consulate in Libya.”

Sept. 19: Team Obama abruptly changes tunes. National Counterterrorism Director Matthew Olsen informs the Senate Homeland Security Committee, “I would say yes, they were killed in the course of a terrorist attack on our embassy.”

edit on 18-10-2012 by Vitruvian because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 08:57 AM
link   
Terrorist are his free ride to re-election. So expect a few more attacks from the terrorists



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 08:59 AM
link   
Just watched 2016 last last night. Its all clearer now, he hates the American way with a passion. He is not dumb, he is a very smart radical, who has all his chess pieces in place for the next four years to destroy everything we are. Romney is a good guy I believe, but not what we neeed. He will keep us from being destroyed until Americans wake up and find a young Ron Paul, and the media is brought to justice for feeding the lies.



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 09:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitruvian
 


This will be the go-to thread on all debate on the topic!


I wish all the apologists on this site would read it.

Thank you OP for finding this and developing the information.



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitruvian
 


If ever there was a conspiracy to delve into by the minds of ATS...this is the one. All the dribs and drabs of info leaking out, have been pointing to a much deeper story than we have been getting. The shift to connecting the dots is greatly feared by this administration. Don't let go of these details, don't let them get lost in the political rhetoric of this election. Don't let the lives of 4 brave Americans trickle down the drain of indifference.

Great work OP....


Des



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:20 AM
link   
I though last we knew, Chris Stevens died from smoke inhalation? Was that not true?



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by PatriotGames2
I though last we knew, Chris Stevens died from smoke inhalation? Was that not true?


Yes, you must be right, he died from smoke inhalation while a utube driven frenzied mob chanted outside for hours before storming and burning the place down. White House story V2.4

Next....

Des



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:29 AM
link   
reply to post by Destinyone
 


The Obama administration has more "versions" of this story than Microsoft!



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:35 AM
link   
The theory could tie in with this....

Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik

Well maybe we have finally got a possible answer to all the Libya 9-11 confusion.

With all the hoodwinking and spinning and twisting of the story by dozens of the highest U.S. Government "officials", this theory presented on a radio show might be hitting bedrock.

Kevin Dujan, a political analyst and radio and TV host wrote an article that seems to suggest that Obama (and / or pulsating drooling campaign advisers) had a master plan to make it all look good.

If true, it backfired big time to say the least.

Maybe this is why all the "officials" appeared to be caught off guard ??

The Western Center for Journalism has the article and has put up a YouTube video.

We all know the Western Center for Journalism is a "neutral" source now don't we ?


Just the same, this might be an answer to the madness.

It's a bombshell if any proof comes forward !!



America watched in disbelief as Barack Obama tried to tell the American people that the attack on the Libyan consulate on September 11 was the result of an amateurish, anti-Muslim video that had been on YouTube for three months with barely three hundred views.

Then suddenly the administration announced that it was, yes, a terrorist attack, but that it was the intelligence community that had fed him bad information, even though we knew our intelligence community had known it was an al-Qaeda-linked attack within twenty four hours.

Why the equivocation? Why the lies?

None of it made sense.

Until now. ...................

Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik
{Read and Comment}
 


"Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping to Trade Blind Sheik"



That Barack Obama had arranged with the Muslim Brotherhood to kidnap the Ambassador, and through Obama’s supposed affinity with the Muslim world, Obama would save the day and get the ambassador released.

But the Muslim Brotherhood wanted something in return.

Their beloved Blind Sheik.

Unbelievable?


Hmmmm.....



I suppose this makes as much sense as anything else we've heard ?

Who would conjure up such a wild idea ?


www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:40 AM
link   
As I've understood it reading speculation on this is that this may have been an arrangement with the Muslim Brotherhood to effect a release of the "Blind Sheik".

Ie; arrange for Stevens to be taken hostage then trade Stevens for the Sheik except Stevens died messing up the administrations October surprise.



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitruvian
 


The one thing I don't understand...well, maybe two are.

1. Why would AMB Stevens meet with people he knew were nefarious and feared. What was said to him that made him go?

2. Why send a Ambassador to recover weapons from people who clearly don't want to give them up? That seems to more of a military job doesn't it?

OK...three.

WHY ARE WE ARMING THESE PEOPLE IN THE FIRST PLACE knowing that these weapons will eventually be turned against us!?



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:42 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Yes, thats one of articles I was alluding to - thanks for linking!



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:42 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


That is a theory I had never heard of.

It does sound plausible.



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by Vitruvian
 


The one thing I don't understand...well, maybe two are.

1. Why would AMB Stevens meet with people he knew were nefarious and feared. What was said to him that made him go?

2. Why send a Ambassador to recover weapons from people who clearly don't want to give them up? That seems to more of a military job doesn't it?

OK...three.

WHY ARE WE ARMING THESE PEOPLE IN THE FIRST PLACE knowing that these weapons will eventually be turned against us!?


On #2, Thats why two SEALS were there and its their indpendant action that may have led to the planned operation going haywire on the plotters.



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:58 AM
link   
So where is the proof of any of this?

I would take this more seriously if it hadn't come from Sinclair. As you know, he devotes himself and his website to bashing Obama.



Sinclair has over the past four plus years developed a multitude of Political & News sources in his efforts to expose the truth about Barack Obama on the left, right and center of the political spectrum.


Don't forget to pick-up your tickets for the Occupy vs. Tea Party extravaganza and stay tuned to his broadcast in which he will have a bunch of guests that randomly pop in and out just to bash radical Islam!


Damn, you guys are gullible today. This is the second thread I have seen created that is supposed to be earth-shattering......but it's not. Just time wasting, and if you have a credit card, money-wasting.
edit on 18-10-2012 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 10:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Destinyone

Originally posted by PatriotGames2
I though last we knew, Chris Stevens died from smoke inhalation? Was that not true?


Yes, you must be right, he died from smoke inhalation while a utube driven frenzied mob chanted outside for hours before storming and burning the place down. White House story V2.4 Next....Des


Another very important point is made here ---> Very significant testimony was presented to the House Oversite Committee - Daryl Issa (again) by Ms. Charlene R. Lamb Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Programs, Bureau of Diplomatic Security
U.S. Department of State
(her actual testimony PDF) PDF - oversight.house.gov...

________________________________________
Ms. Lambs testimony is from a first hand video account which lasted six hours and during that time NO HELP was called for and NO HELP was sent even though the entire security staff of which Ms Lamb had charge were all well aware of the seriousness of the Al Qaida terrorist attack.

In other words - she and her staff had full access to a LIVE video feed accounting of the terror events as they unfolded - and they did nothing...........

AND the CIA Safe House that had 12 agents inside - and which actually provided the LIVE video feed - that was right next door to it all did not act either.


edit on 18-10-2012 by Vitruvian because: text



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 11:06 AM
link   
reply to post by Phoenix
 


That may be true but remember, they were former SEALs and were there as security contractors for the State Dept.

Two guys who can put a world of hurt on somebody, but numbers overwhelmed them.

I was actually thinking along the lines of sending in a larger group to recover the weapons.

This theory, while I believe it to be completely plausible, makes this Admin look even more amatuerish. It's like they have watched to many movies.

Any Rebel who has just won a victory will not give their weapons anytime soon. Regardless of who gave them to them. This is common sense...which is something that this Admin apparently lacks.

I do have a feeling though that we will not be seeing any October surprise.



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 11:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by TDawgRex
reply to post by Phoenix
 


That may be true but remember, they were former SEALs and were there as security contractors for the State Dept.


Two were 'former' SEAL's hired as security, but one of then was actually still military - an active duty SEAL.

reply to post by xuenchen
 
- Benghazi Attack Was Botched Kidnapping To Trade Blind Sheik

AND I find this information in the link (above) to be equally as interesting (if not more so) as were the original propositions set forth by the OP - the answers maybe lie somewhere in-between, or it could very well be that major aspects of both stories are true. When all is said and done it looks as though we have plenty of fuel for 'informed speculation' as to what really happened.
edit on 18-10-2012 by Vitruvian because: text



posted on Oct, 18 2012 @ 03:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Vitruvian
 


Cheers and a star!





top topics
 
37
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join