reply to post by mike dangerously
Somebody please tell me why this is an issue anyway? I get that the true story didn't come out of the White House as quickly and as accurately as it
might have and that in retrospect intel was ignored. In retrospect if someone had taken it seriously, these 4 people might still be alive.
Granted, and there is enough blame to go around but twice as many people accepting it. Is it really worth the speculation and finger pointing here?
Easy to second guess after something has happened. I mean do we suspect some complicity on the part of our own White House in the attacks? Is there
something I am missing here?
It was a mistake. Move on.
If ignoring intel is your major complaint, may I remind you GWB ignored credible intel too. 4000 dead and we are still paying for that little
"judgement error?" How is this a bigger sin? Or even a blip on the radar??
edit on 17-10-2012 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)