Hi. I'm John Silverswan and I am here, in science forum, once again. I want to show that logic can easily be applied to see the truth behind this
screen of lies which the Big Paid Media has put in front of the people's eyes to blind us from said truth. And that if anyone starts doubting certain
aspects, then the typical reply comes: "you were paid by the Oil Industries". Wow. That's some big scientific argument. Following that logic, if I
doubt Creationism, the reason would be because "I were paid by Oil Industries". Geez, people must be rich; I am starting to wonder how come there's
still a low-income class. That's some stupid argument, which you never see in other scientific debates and which, I feel, proves the fact one can't
oppose another's opinion with facts, so one must use typical childish accusation tactics instead.
So, we all heard of this Global Warming thing. Did you know - fun fact here - that in the 70s, the big news was about Global Cooling and not Global
Warming? Interrestingly enough, the Big Media was promoting Global Cooling theory to scare us into abandonning our culture and technologies. But there
was a small problem with Global Cooling propaganda: it wasn't scary a bit. So what? We will have more skiing days. Sahara desert will lose ground and
start being fertile. Things like that. So some decades ago, the Big Media abandonned Global Cooling scare tactic, and got thinking. You have to excuse
their slowness; you see they are so rich they pay other people to think at their place because otherwise their brains would fry due to sudden usage.
So around 2000 they finally got it: They will promote - attention, ladies and gentlemen, this is big - Global Warming
instead of Global
. They decided to make the irrealistic Kyoto treaty, the Green Campaign... When it was obvious Kyoto treaty wouldn't be
fufilled, well they gloated their "victory" and went on saying people just couldn't stop consuming gasoline. Well, Mr Hidden Hand Behind Cultural
Influences, we'll stop consuming gasoline once you start distributing those technologies which military and elite uses and which you keep hidden from
us. We are not in Sahara desert, we have a culture going on, an economy. These allows individual freedom, and from this freedom springs arts and
private entreprises which defines our culture. We can't just throw all that out of the window, and come back to bronze age. This would mean other
cultures, say North Korean, will gain strategical grounds, as government sectors need private sectors for recruits and new ideas.
But the shadow Government, the Hidden Hand (call it FEMA's "replacement government", which is sitting under Mount Weather, waiting for a state of
Emergency to throw out current president, convert people to labour force, and impose tyrranical domination over all - call it communism, nazism, or
zionism), doesn't care about cultures, it's everywhere. All it cares about is money and more labour force. So it actually promotes low-technological
levels in population. It bombs Middle East and corrupts American & European economy so that "They" get the good stuff and "You" end up getting
nothing - why should the people get access to advancements, right? People are just people, disposable.
So, anyway, They (you know, the big serious guys who wants to dominate the world) pushed a scary theory: Global Warming. Ooh, that's scary, right?
The Earth would be warming a couple of degrees, which would be enough to flash flood New York, make malaria multiply at superman-ish rates, and
instantly melt gigatons of ice in the two poles. Wow, that's scary. If only I knew it was so scary, I would probably have decided to wear Global
Warming disguise next Halloween, think about the amount of candies I would get.
So they reviewed all these temperature data that we have recorded, and they made it into this ever-popular, superstar chart:
And then Al Gore put on his dramatic face and made a movie, Unconventional Truth, in which he tells us, with a straight face, that no, Earth is
warming, not cooling, and that CO2 traps infrared rays from the sun by reflecting them back to Earth.
Ookayy... Now, has anyone seen that movie? It's quite burlesque; it actually look like that: a movie, meant to entertain, not to inform. You see,
it's really hilarious. The guy starts off by telling a stupid obvious lie. Al starts off by saying, "My professor decided to record annual
temperature, and the result was staggering: each years, the temperature goes up relative to the last one. "And then Al shows something like that:
Hm. Does anyone see what's wrong with this picture? Well, let's compare it to our Famous Superstar climate graph:
Okay, here I see annual mean temperatures going up, then slightly down, then a bit up,then more up, then a super-drop... It's Irregular. Al Gore's
"perfectly regular" description is nowhere near what the records show. I don't know where his professor "recorded" his temperature, on Pluto,
perhaps, when it started approaching the sun???
And then he tells us something even more stupid - and that, I keep seeing this everywhere in the Big Media. He goes, "Out of all scientists polled,
none of them ever found Global Warming theory contreversial. " Strange. Sympatico.ca, last year: "300 000 experts collectively voiced their doubts
about global warming". In Al's time, the Theory was still young; meaning the amount of scientists opposing the Theory was in milions. A number of
them were obviously funded by Oil Industries, while others were more honest reasearchers. If only Al could, like, stop living in his dreamworld, with
its Pluto-like temperature trends, then maybe could he actually see what's really going on, here on planet Earth, with real graphs and real
scientists. But political and financial goals are not always aligned with the people's need for true information and advancements. The one which are
at the top wants to stay at the top.
And it goes on. The point is, Now the big publicity is Global Warming. Humans make CO2 which acts like a mirror and reflects outgoing heat back to
Eath. Is that supported by graphs? Well, the truth is, IT IS HARD TO TELL - TEMPERATURE RECORD DATA ARE ALMOST NEVER RAW, THEY ARE BEING TEMPERED
to "compensate measurement bias". You see, before the satellite era, all measurements were made on Earth, using thermometers. Alot of
people think that climate experts just simply take a thermometer, and write down the result. The truth is, the station, in which the thermometer is
located, is subject to temperature variation - which means, the station's temperature is never exactly representative of the true temperature. So,
the guys take or add a few degrees to try and get a "truthful" result. Here is a paper (one amongst many, feel free to Google your way around) about
bias compensation and NASA and NOAA's climate ground data modification.
for those who don't want to click the link, here's one part of the text:
See www.appinsys.com... for more info on Hansen’s data manipulations.
The following figures show a more recent example of the GISS re-adjustment of data (from: Bob Tisdale at i44.tinypic.com...). The 2000
and 2009 versions of the GISTEMP data are compared. This shows the additional artificial warming trend created through data adjustments.
Since 2000, NASA has further “cleaned” the historical record. The following graph shows the further warming adjustments made to the data in 2005.
(The data can be downloaded at data.giss.nasa.gov...; the following graph is from
www.theregister.co.uk...). This figure plots the difference between the 2000 adjusted data and the
2005 adjusted data. Although the 2000 to 2005 adjustment differences are not as large as the 1999 to 2000 adjustment differences shown above, they add
additional warming to the trend throughout the historical record.
So, obviously, we stopped relying on ground data and, instead, some decades ago, we sent satelite to make the measurement in space. Now the result is
much more precise. So, what did the satellite measured? Well, we have it right here:
The satelite sensors receives heat outgoing from Earth.
Wait. Remember how CO2 deflects Infrared rays? And that more CO2 means a better reflexion? Look at Venus. The reason you see it so bright is because
she has so much volcanic CO2 in her atmosphere, it litterally mirrors light from the sun back to space - that's called albedo. Well, does anyone see
what's being measured by satellite orbiting around Earth? Satellite sensors are monitoring the amount of heat... which has been reflected away
from Earth, back to space, due to Earth's growing CO2 layer!
CO2 is slowly insulating Earth from sun's infrared rays, reflecting them back to
space (where the satellites wait), instead of letting Earth absorbing them! The amount detected by the satellites is not the temperature of Earth's
surface (which is under the CO2 layer - Earth is insulated by CO2, remember? That means sattelites in space can't read past it), it's the amount of
heat which has been deflected back to space, due to the CO2, and it's growing! We are really undergoing Global Cooling, and it's confirmed by the
sattelite records of deflected heat! And that is, also, confirmed by polar ice sheets high-precision measurements. The amount of ice is steadily
growing in Antartica.
Doran PT, Priscu JC, Lyons WB, Walsh JE, Fountain AG, McKnight DM, Moorhead DL, Virginia RA, Wall DH, Clow GD, Fritsen CH, McKay CP, Parson AN,
2002, Antartic climate cooling and terrestial ecosystem response, nature 415: 517-20
From 1986 to 2000 central Antartic valleys cooled .7° C per decade with serious ecosystem damage from cold.
Joughin I, Tulaczyk S, 2002, Positive mass balance of the Ross Ice streams, West Antartica, Science 295: 476-80
Side-looking radar measurements show West Antartica ice is increasing at 26.8 gigatons/yr. Reversing the melting trend of the las 6,000 years.
Petit JR, Jouzel J, Raynaud D, Barkov NI, Barnola J-M, Basile I, Bender M, Chappellaz J, Davis M, Delaygue G, Delmotte M, Kotlyakov VM, Legrand M,
Lipenkov VY, Lorius C, Pepin L, Ritz C, Saltzman E, Stievenard M, 1999, Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice
core, Antartica, Nature 399: 429-36
During the last four interglacials, going back 420,000 years, the Earth was warmer than it is today.
Parkinson CL, 2002, Trends in the lenght of the southern Ocean sea-ice season, 1979-99, Annals of Glaciology 34: 435-40
The greater part of Antartica experiences a longer sea-ice season, lasting 21 days longer than it did in 1979.
Now, some of you may wonder why after 1998 the satelite sensed less heat; the reason is as simple and obvious as it is because there is less heat to
bounce back to space. The solar system travels in space; it is currently entering what NASA calls "the Rift", that is, a zone which can be visible
in the night sky and which has a high concentration of nebula. Solar systems hardly follow a straight line. It's in fact kinda sinous, going out and
back through the Rift. You can see these nebula in the Rift by looking at the night sky; look at the milky way (especially around Sagittarius or Lyra
constelation if you live like me in the northern hemisphere) and you'll see a "rift", made of dark nebulas, which blocks the star's light. Our sun
is going in that thing, which means less sun heat is going to reach us.
Scientists believe that these kind of nebulas were the cause for the last Ice Ages. What do you think is happening now, as the solar system is, once
again, going back into these nebulas, and knowing that these nebulas can block sunlight and trigger Earth's ice ages?
Now, I am sure we all know, if there's a Global Warming, ice caps are supposed to melt, not gain grounds. But slowly we are starting to feel the
effects of cooling, which includes considerable damage to ecosystems, and ice caps expansion.
We are facing a global cooling! How much longer will the lie hold? I can almost imagine myself: we're in 2070, it's july, and snow is slowly
falling, and I turn on my holographic TV screen. The anchorman is freezing and holds the mic with gloved hands. As snow sets on the top of his hat and
shoulders, he reads his script: "Around -5° C for today, but we promise you, the world is undergoing global warming, I tell you, the snow you see is
just some Oil Industries conspiracy... "
lol Okay, See ya,