Obama smashed Romney in the 2nd Debate, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 17-10-2012 @ 09:38 AM by Flatfish
reply to post by daaskapital


Obama smashed Romney in the 2nd Debate? Yes he did, without a doubt and it doesn't surprise me one bit that Romney supporters didn't see it that way.

Neither does it surprise me that they have forgotten the policies that got us into the economic mess we're in, much less recognize the fact that Romney is just Bush on steroids, especially when it comes to social policies. I highly suspect this has to do with their party's current affliction with SMS or "selective memory syndrome."

IMO, what we witnessed in the first 2 presidential debates was a near perfect execution of a form of confrontational strategy that was introduced some 38 yrs. ago. Ironically, the strategy was first introduced by a black american named Cassius Clay who did actually convert to Islam in 1964 and later went by the name of Mohammed Ali. He called this new strategy "Rope-A-Dope" and he used it successfully in the boxing ring eventually attaining the title of World Heavyweight Champion.

For all you Romney supporters out there, your "Dope" just got "Roped" and I highly suspect you will see a clean knockout of your candidate in the third round. I guess it just goes to prove that, regardless of what Bush said, you can indeed "get fooled again."

F&S for the OP!


reply posted on 17-10-2012 @ 09:47 AM by macman
Originally posted by HostileApostle
reply to post by macman


That a boy, blame the moderator.

I guess you and Romney and the Right Wing have a hard time taking responsibility or having someone take responsibility for their failures.

Ironic, isn't it.


No, I blame 0bama, the Moderator and all the 0bama fanboys for not seeing the truth of what it was.

Romney still did better then 0bama.

That was like a boxing match where the opponent and referee get to hit you.

0bama looked like a stammering clown, with the only saves for him coming from Mr. Crowley.


reply posted on 17-10-2012 @ 09:51 AM by detachedindividual
So let me get this right, the Republicans jump up and down about Romney winning the last one, and now it's clear that Obama won this one they balk at the idea and refuse to accept that their man failed? What a shock!

First, both these guys are fakes and phoney's they will tell people whatever they want to hear. They are self-serving and couldn't give a damn about the American people. They BOTH only care about being in the history books and lining their own pockets while they're here.

But, given that you have to choose between these men, are you going to to choose the man who just repeats "we will fix things" and can't explain how, or are you going to vote for the man who explains how he plans to keep things stable?

Let's get something else clear - America is in $16 trillion of debt. Neither of these men will make that go away. The best you can hope for is the person you electing keeping things together while the economy collapses. That is the BEST you can hope for!

Which of these men is more likely to do that?

There are too many idiots in America who don't understand basic English, and think a guy saying something often enough makes it true. Romney HAS NOT SAID HOW HE WILL DO WHAT HE SAYS HE WILL DO!

Grow up people, this is probably the most important election the US has ever had, and it looks like you're throwing it away based on the nonsense ramblings of a man who can't tell you how he plans to fix anything!

In a way I hope you guys do elect this 'tard. It'll serve you right. Maybe it will force some to actually learn how to COMPREHEND English and understand the difference between someone repeating meaningless BS and someone actually explaining how he will do something?


reply posted on 17-10-2012 @ 10:05 AM by IAMTAT
Directly AFTER the debate, the MAJORITY of members in Focus groups of UNDECIDED voters on MSNBC, CBS and FOX...ALL said they were now going to vote for Romney.

THIS election is ALL about the ECONOMY...and ROMNEY WON...hands down!
Case closed.

MSNBC's Undecided Voter Panel Swayed by Romney

www.weeklystandard.com...

October 17, 2012 CBS Poll: Romney Wins 65-34 on Economy; CNN Poll: Romney Wins 54-40 on Economy, 49-46 on Health Care, 51-44 on Taxes, 59-36 on Deficit, 49-46 on Leadership, All in Favor of Romney

ace.mu.nu...
edit on 17-10-2012 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-10-2012 by IAMTAT because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 17-10-2012 @ 10:06 AM by HostileApostle
reply to post by Flatfish


Oh yeah, I know how much you republicans like to ignore women and their needs and all, but don't you think you're going a little overboard calling Candy Crowley, Mr. Crowley? You do realize that she is a woman, don't you? And a ball-busting one at that!


It's a right wing thing.

They like to call strong intelligent women "men". They do it with Maddow as well.

They expect all women to look like Fox News anchors, blonde and busty, and know their place. It's all very 1950s, which is exactly why they refer to that as the good ol days and when America was great.



reply posted on 17-10-2012 @ 10:12 AM by crawdad1914
reply to post by thetiler


The 5 links to newspaper columnist's asserting "Obama won the debate" represent nothing more than 5 individuals locked into the present political paradigm, expressing their individual opinions on a meaningless "debate" full of scripted and rehearsed answers to expected questions allowed by a moderator who is also locked into the present insane political 2 party system. The opinions of those 5 columnists in the links provided mean as little, as the average Fox news pundit who is touting his man (Romney) as being the winner.

Only once we stop listening to these idiot pundits and begin to think for ourselves, will we be able to break free of this Sport, we call politics.


reply posted on 17-10-2012 @ 10:12 AM by macman
Lots of BS you are pitching. Let's take it apart.


Originally posted by Flatfish

Yeah, ain't it a bitch when the moderator has to step in and stop a candidate from telling bald faced lies during a debate? I hate it when that happens.

If that was the case, then it would have happened to both, by your logic. Unless you believe his highness walks on water.
Both sides are claiming the other lied. SO.....Knowing that 0bama is a narcissist, and a perpetual liar like Bill Clinton, it is safe to say 0bama pitching more untruths then Romney.
But, the rules were clear as to how Manly Crowley was supposed to moderate.
The life lines to 0bama were a clear sign of his struggling to interact with Romney.
In a very simple statement, it took 0bama getting help from the Ref to be declared a winner.

Originally posted by Flatfish
Oh yeah, I know how much you republicans like to ignore women and their needs and all,

First, as stated many times before, I am not a republican.
Secondly, what needs? Like Govt paid birth control??? I guess telling woman to purchase their own birth control is just too much, or close their legs.
What a joke.



Originally posted by Flatfish
but don't you think you're going a little overboard calling Candy Crowley, Mr. Crowley?

Nope, not one bit. Thanks for playing.

Originally posted by Flatfish
You do realize that she is a woman, don't you?

That is highly questionable.

Originally posted by Flatfish
And a ball-busting one at that!

Ball busting because she sided with 0bama?
Good hell. The bias there was SO transparent.
edit on 17-10-2012 by macman because: (no reason given)
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul Won (Great Read) - Huffington Post
  Posted 13 days ago with 127 member flags
Texas GOP Mutiny - SC, VA, LA and Others May Join
  Posted 15 days ago with 83 member flags
A Common Man\'s Guide to the Federal Budget.
  Posted 3 days ago with 51 member flags
*VID* Ron Paul delegates speak out from RNC.
  Posted 8 days ago with 39 member flags