It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daaskapital
Thanks for backing me up on this Lucid Lunacy
To those questioning the performance, it was clear that Obama won. Romney called out Obama on numerous occasions, and was wrong on one. Obama successfully rebutted these and made Romney out to be a dickhead more than once.
Romney was less professional in handling things than Obama. Romney would occasionally go over time and interrupt Obama and the moderator. Sure Obama did too, but Romney done it twice as much.
Romney was stuttering all over the place and never ceased to get into Obama's face.
Originally posted by spinalremain
Reply to post by NLDelta9
Are you nuts?
Before Obama took office the economy was a lead balloon.
You have selctive memory. I know I am better off now than I was 4 years ago and so are my neighbors. Bush admin and banks brought us to our knees and single handedly destroyed the economy.
You may not like how Obama does things, but to ignore the halt of the impending depression is to wear red tinted glasses.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by spinalremain
Reply to post by NLDelta9
Are you nuts?
Before Obama took office the economy was a lead balloon.
You have selctive memory. I know I am better off now than I was 4 years ago and so are my neighbors. Bush admin and banks brought us to our knees and single handedly destroyed the economy.
You may not like how Obama does things, but to ignore the halt of the impending depression is to wear red tinted glasses.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by spinalremain
Reply to post by SANTA CLAWS
Would you somehow expect welfare to go down when millions lose their home?
You don't make a point, and you're only supporting mine. The reason that welfare went up under Obama is because Bush wasn't allowed another term and McCain lost. Obama is merely the man who took office after his predecessor destroyed the economy for 8 years.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by dude77
Originally posted by spinalremain
Reply to post by SANTA CLAWS
Would you somehow expect welfare to go down when millions lose their home?
You don't make a point, and you're only supporting mine. The reason that welfare went up under Obama is because Bush wasn't allowed another term and McCain lost. Obama is merely the man who took office after his predecessor destroyed the economy for 8 years.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
so what you're basically saying is that obama is not responsible for anything, even though he is the president and has been for 4 yrs .. even though he himself made many promises and didn't come through .. according to you, he is absolved of any blame .. that is quite an insulting point of view
Originally posted by Propulsion
Another 4 years of Obama will put us sooooo deep in it, that America will never be able to dig it's way out!!!
Presidents don't create jobs
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by macaronicaesar
Presidents don't create jobs
Then why is the admin taking credit for making millions of jobs now? All the govt can do is create an atmosphere amenable to business and job creation, and this admin is woefully bad at creating a pro business atmosphere because they are too busy creating the welfare State.
You mistakenly assume I support this administration. I don't. However, democrats have a better solution for creating an environment to create growth. Romney has the same failed Reagon, I don't understand economics one iota as the rest of his party. He knows how to make profits for himself. Not the same thing.
Do you have any of your own thoughts, or do you just parrot everything you hear on the tele?
The truth is, they both suck, but Republicans are terribad at managing the economy, it isn't possible in the first place, but they allow the rich to get richer in the process by promoting unbalanced top heavy tax breaks. Most of them are rich because they are cheap.