It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Oct. 16, 2012 Presidential debate thread

page: 43
14
<< 40  41  42    44  45  46 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 




Um, doesn't anyone read her posts? I think she voted Libertarian. So is the attack and insult just because she didn't vote for Obama?


Yes, I read her posts and her posts tell me that she will defend Romney till the end and bash Obama whenever she has a chance. Yes, I'm aware she claims she doesn't support him, this is the exact definition of a shill.

It's the oldest trick in the book, claim you don't support someone, in fact claim you dislike the person. Then every chance you get defend him, say he is telling the truth, say he won the debate, say his plans are better...and then claim that you can be trusted because you are not biased because you don't support him.

Come on, it is so transparent. Her push back on being called a Romney supporter is just more proof of her game and she just desperately doesn't want to be exposed.




posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:17 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 



I find it amusing that NOW the left asks for specifics, when Obama got hired with just "hope and change".


Do you find it amusing that you claim it was dumb to elect Obama with no specifics, and then you are fully admitting you are going to do the same thing with Romney?



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by HostileApostle
 


You do realise that it is possible to disagree with Obama and not agree with Romney, don't you?



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by popcornmafia
Originally posted by seabag



Romney is going wipe the floor with POTUS.

Just like the first debate everyone will see how much a better candidate Romney is...

Benghazi will be the final knockout to POTUS and will be a big hit and clinton cant fix this one
no matter how much more she lies
edit on 16-10-2012 by popcornmafia because: (no reason given)


And that Benghazi thing didnt work out for your guy either did it. Too bad so sad.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by popcornmafia
Originally posted by seabag



Romney is going wipe the floor with POTUS.

Just like the first debate everyone will see how much a better candidate Romney is...

Benghazi will be the final knockout to POTUS and will be a big hit and clinton cant fix this one
no matter how much more she lies
edit on 16-10-2012 by popcornmafia because: (no reason given)

And that Benghazi thing didnt work out for your guy either did it. Too bad so sad.


4 people died and Obama blamed a vid on Youtube.

Romney was right, Crowley and Obama were wrong.

QED

edit on 17-10-2012 by beezzer because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by HostileApostle
 


You do realise that it is possible to disagree with Obama and not agree with Romney, don't you?


Is it possible to defend Romney/Ryan in every single thread, claim they have won every single debate, and claim their plans are better, and then say you don't support them?

It's an old tactic to try to make your word have more credibility, that is all it is. If someone truly didn't support either candidate, would they really spend so much energy soley defending one of them?



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by HostileApostle

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by HostileApostle
 


You do realise that it is possible to disagree with Obama and not agree with Romney, don't you?


Is it possible to defend Romney/Ryan in every single thread, claim they have won every single debate, and claim their plans are better, and then say you don't support them?

It's an old tactic to try to make your word have more credibility, that is all it is. If someone truly didn't support either candidate, would they really spend so much energy soley defending one of them?


Sometimes the truth needs no explanation. Actually, her opinion would actually be more valid than yours or mine since she doesn't have a personal interest in either person.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by HostileApostle
Question 1 goes to Obama.

Romney did not give one specific of how he is going to create jobs, just that "I know how to create jobs". But he doesn't say how.


No he didnt and then he end his night by saying that "The government does not create jobs, the government does not create jobs." (twice in case we didnt hear the first time.) So dont expect jobs from this guy. Matter of fact the people who have to work for a living wont even fall into the group of people he feels he needs to pay attention to. They (we) are the ones he doesnt have to worry about. Good, I dont need him worring about me anyway.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 



4 people died and Obama blamed a vid on Youtube.

Romney was right, Crowley and Obama were wrong.


4 Americans died and Romney tried to use their dead bodies as political pawns. And the Ambassador's father and one of the other victims mother has told Romney to stop using their kids deaths as political tools to try to win votes.

Crowley and Obama were right, I'll never get tired of posting this.

www.whitehouse.gov...

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.


This is what we call a documented fact. Have fun with lying to yourself.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by HostileApostle

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by HostileApostle
 


You do realise that it is possible to disagree with Obama and not agree with Romney, don't you?


Is it possible to defend Romney/Ryan in every single thread, claim they have won every single debate, and claim their plans are better, and then say you don't support them?

It's an old tactic to try to make your word have more credibility, that is all it is. If someone truly didn't support either candidate, would they really spend so much energy soley defending one of them?


Both are turds, just Romney doesn't smell as bad.

So I guess I am in the same boat as FF, don't like either but am able to stomach Romney's baloney then Obama's.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by HostileApostle
Question 1 goes to Obama.

Romney did not give one specific of how he is going to create jobs, just that "I know how to create jobs". But he doesn't say how.


No he didnt and then he end his night by saying that "The government does not create jobs, the government does not create jobs." (twice in case we didnt hear the first time.) So dont expect jobs from this guy. Matter of fact the people who have to work for a living wont even fall into the group of people he feels he needs to pay attention to. They (we) are the ones he doesnt have to worry about. Good, I dont need him worring about me anyway.


Still what he said is correct, the government doesn't create jobs.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:28 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 



Actually, her opinion would actually be more valid than yours or mine since she doesn't have a personal interest in either person.


You clearly haven't been following what I have been saying.

That is her game, that is what she is going for, that is what she wants you to believe.

"Hey, look at this person, they don't like either one of them, we can trust their unbiased opinion."

This is the defintion of a shill, look it up.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by HostileApostle
reply to post by beezzer
 



4 people died and Obama blamed a vid on Youtube.

Romney was right, Crowley and Obama were wrong.


4 Americans died and Romney tried to use their dead bodies as political pawns. And the Ambassador's father and one of the other victims mother has told Romney to stop using their kids deaths as political tools to try to win votes.

Crowley and Obama were right, I'll never get tired of posting this.

www.whitehouse.gov...

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.


This is what we call a documented fact. Have fun with lying to yourself.


Bull spit!

You (or someone else) removed the paragraph.


No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.
He was talking about September 11th, 2001.



Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

Here he was talking about Bengazi.

Nice edit.
Failfail;fail.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by seabag
It will be more of the same...

Another poor showing by Obama and another great beating by Romney.

The race could be over tonight.....Just saying!
edit on 16-10-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)


Didnt turn out like you expected did it.


Nope. Thankfully for Obama he had his libtard shill Candy there to prop him up
and take the liberal side. See my previous post.

Crowley interrupts Romney 28 times, Obama only 9 times



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:31 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


Romney armed himself with a two week delay to throw at the President when we know the President did call this a terrorist attack the following day in the Rose garden.
Yes people were killed. I am not making light of that at all. ( God rest their souls) This whole situation should never have been politizied in the first place. But Romeny wanted to jump in and comment to show how presidential he could be and wound up looking foolish and illinformed.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by HostileApostle


You clearly haven't been following what I have been saying.

That is her game, that is what she is going for, that is what she wants you to believe.

"Hey, look at this person, they don't like either one of them, we can trust their unbiased opinion."

This is the defintion of a shill, look it up.


I tried. Your avatar kept popping up.




posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by karen61057

Originally posted by popcornmafia
Originally posted by seabag



Romney is going wipe the floor with POTUS.

Just like the first debate everyone will see how much a better candidate Romney is...

Benghazi will be the final knockout to POTUS and will be a big hit and clinton cant fix this one
no matter how much more she lies
edit on 16-10-2012 by popcornmafia because: (no reason given)




And that Benghazi thing didnt work out for your guy either did it. Too bad so sad.


Sure it did everyone saw how the president lied. Everyone got to see how desperate obama was to try to win
it is the knockout blow to POTUS. Romney did wipe the floor with POTUS and everyone got to see how much a better president romney would be.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by NoJoker13
Well in that case, that's just a waste of a vote.

Well .. it's my vote to 'waste'. I couldn't vote for either Romney nor Obama.
In my opinion, neither one is qualified and neither one can be trusted.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:36 PM
link   
reply to post by MidnightTide
 


So why all the talk about unemployment and jobs if the govt has nothign to do with it. Why slam Obama for the last four years if there was nothing that he could do ? Why is every jobs report so damned important to the election ? Oh, thats right its all about jobs.



posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 04:38 PM
link   
reply to post by beezzer
 


It's all in the same paragraph.

He is talking about Benghazi, but of course, you like so many other Right Wingers are mind readers and seem to think you know what he really meant.

Let me post it for you again, just so you don't forget that Romney was WRONG and Obama and Crowley were RIGHT.

www.whitehouse.gov...

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.


You are free to go to the link and read it for yourself, this is exactly what he said.


Maybe you having a hard time with reading and words. So here is a video for you.


edit on 17-10-2012 by HostileApostle because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
14
<< 40  41  42    44  45  46 >>

log in

join