What just happened in northwest Louisiana? Unexplained Explosion , page 33


Pages: <<  30    31    32    33    34    35    36  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 116 times


reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 04:51 PM by OneisOne
Originally posted by LSU0408
reply to
post by OneisOne



You mean you gave up a little over a gallon of gas for that website? I commend you for following up on everything...

Who cares about gas! That's half way to one of my favorite 6 packs!! (which in all seriousness is Sweetwater IPA)

I am wondering though if the simulated inventory of the magazine is close to what might have been stored in the one that exploded on Monday night.
edit on 19-10-2012 by OneisOne because: derrr.. fix tags!



reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 04:58 PM by wirefly
reply to post by TheOtter


Why on Earth would the methane have to come from Bayou Corne? There is natural gas all over the place! Besides that, there are so many different faults and sands and shales between us, it would need to be a pipeline connecting the two for that to happen. Why can't the gas up there just be plain old up there gas? Sheesh!!



reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 04:59 PM by wirefly
reply to post by TwiztidRoman


For the same reason it is everywhere else. It's natural gas.


reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 06:06 PM by aboutface
reply to post by CLPrime


You are all brilliant and this thread is absolutely captivating my attention and interest.

I'm curious about the theory of munitions theft. Suppose there had been a theft and they left some behind to create a blast. How little an amount would be required to blow a cement dust cloud up to 7000 feet?


reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 06:15 PM by wirefly
reply to post by Sissel



Sissel, Not sure where you lived here in LA, but, I was born and raised here in SW LA. Even here it's not all marsh. It's only marshy down in the coastal parishes, but north of I10, it's pretty much normal. We have some swamps for sure, but, so do lots of states. It's by no means all marsh.


reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 06:16 PM by Stevie777
Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to
post by Stevie777



Can't disprove it without first trying to prove it. That's how I eliminated the meteor impact theory. This thread is on a few different tangents trying to get to the bottom of it...even my own opinion has been rather fluid. Gotta cover all the bases.

I dont see conspiracies in every story....a bunker blew up...the meteorites, if there ever were any, were coincidental...i dont see one Videos of strange meteorites the length and breadth of two/three states that were supposed to last for over an hour, but i could link/post up videos of two major meteorites/space debris from the UK this year alone, that lasted no more than 30 seconds each..


reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 06:31 PM by CLPrime
reply to post by aboutface



It's hard to say. A standard 100 ton explosion would create a 7000-ft plume, but this isn't a standard explosion. The bunker is designed to direct the blast upward, so the upward force is greater than in a regular explosion. That would mean that a similar-sized cloud should be formed by a lesser yield, perhaps something like 20 tons. Maybe. To know for sure, you'd have to go blow up another bunker.



reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 08:41 PM by Sissel
An update from just about an hour ago from the National Guard. Check out the link as it has an interesting photo of the bunker from ground level.

www.shreveporttimes.com... explosion?odyssey=tab%7Cmostpopular%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE

The substance that exploded was a smokeless powder and does not pose a threat outside of Camp Minden. Explo is currently conducting clean-up operations of the site. The incident is under investigation by the LSP. The incident area is a restricted area and will remain off limits to anyone other than authorized individuals due to normal operational security and safety requirements.


Interesting...if this was smokeless powder, why was the plume so enormous?
edit on 19-10-2012 by Sissel because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 08:51 PM by Guyfriday
reply to post by Sissel



I wonder what kind of "Smokeless Powder" explodes like that. (regular gun grade smokeless powder burns and doesn't explode)


reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 09:46 PM by deadeyedick
reply to post by autopat51



The first pics from the video are too poor quality to be sure of anything.
It seems that this pic was taken standing in front of the train cars.
The trees leaning over don't match up.
The ash color grey in the first pic does not show up in the second.
It is hard to see in the first pic any concrete left standing.
Neither one show any concrete chunks or debris or dust.
I see a bunch of severely burnt wood that should have been burnt up by the time this was discovered.


reply posted on 19-10-2012 @ 09:52 PM by autopat51
reply to post by deadeyedick



that is why i asked..it didnt look the same to me.
i am prob wrong but needed some input


reply posted on 20-10-2012 @ 12:04 AM by wirefly
Originally posted by Guyfriday
reply to
post by Sissel



I wonder what kind of "Smokeless Powder" explodes like that. (regular gun grade smokeless powder burns and doesn't explode)


You are correct that it burns. However, when you add a compressive element, such as a paper wrap as in typical class c fireworks, or in this case, a massive concrete bunker, that deflagrating powder is quickly increasing in volume as it becomes a gas adding heat and pressure exponentially inside that bunker causing the process to accelerate until it has become an explosive device in and of itself. If that same amount of powder were sitting in a pile in the open air, you would have a very hot mess on your hands, but no windows blown out or trees knocked over.

We used to use a prepared six ounce charge of smokeless powder, about the size of your fist, inside a special canon rig to flip cars in movies. I could take that same amount of powder in a pile and throw a match into it and make a big flash with no concussive force at all. Now typically we use compressed nitrogen instead because it's cleaner and more controllable. Special effects have become a lot more scientific over the years, but it's still a wild ride to be sure.
Pages: <<  30    31    32    33    34    35    36  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags