Worse before better

I began a blog because, as the blog banner suggests of my concern that western society has become to left wing pink, and fluffy, and that through the combination of communist political correctness, and radical feminism the anglosphere is rapidly flushing away everything that was once right, and joyful is now nearly all necrotic, and sour.

Normal heterosexual desire is only a few small steps away from being declared a hate crime, obesity is now seen as a lifestyle choice rather than the mental disorder that it so clearly is. Cultural Marxism hates beauty, yet it cannot stand to hear an ugly truth, so instead perpetuates pretty lies that sensor freedom of thought and expression which leads to the dystopian state in which no one now matter how depraved, and self indulgent should ever be made to feel they are being judged, unless of course you happen to be a normal heterosexual which means you are a hater.

One of the wisest statements I have heard lately was here on ATS "political correctness is communist thought control disguised as good manners", this going to be my new meme, and I think this would serve very well as a mantra for the fightback that is beginning to gain ground on the fringes, and will in time find its way into mainstream thought. Unfortunately the required correction is still a long way off because the opinions of normal thinkers are becoming less, and less represented where it counts i.e. in politics, law, education, the media that are the principal instruments of societal change.

The left (socialists, and democrats[gimmedats]) will always remain the most populist faction because they offer to give every minority everything for nothing even if it leads to national bankruptcy, and insurmountable borrowing, in fact this travesty furthers the communist mission creep as western nations have to go cap in hand to the likes of China, and Russia to have any chance of just about making the IMF loan interest repayments.

So why then the alienation of the normal heterosexual?, put simply the strong family unit is the biggest obstacle to cultural Marxism because a family has to be concerned about what its taxes are spent on, its disposable income has to be spent wisely, and not frittered away. Dystopia purposefully ignores the uncomfortable truth that without working families to pay for its dysfunctional indulgences the "everything free for every outlier gravy train" will eventually grind to a parsimonious halt, and that is why it will eventually crash, but there is still a long way to go.

reply to post by hotel1


Wow. There are plenty of places to live in this world where women have no rights, are considered property not actual human beings and being gay is illegal. Personally, I would support women's rights and gay peoples rights with my life. I have a daughter, I want her to grow up in a place were she can live as a normal person should. She deserves to have every right that I have as a human being. One of my best friends is just as gay as gay can be and you know what? He is one of the most honest, kindest, best example of what a person should be than any straight guy I have ever met in my life.....just a wonderful human being and as such deserves every right that anyone else has. I wouldn't trade his friendship for anything in the world. Being so narrow minded, you may just miss out on some pretty amazing wonderful people in your life. We are all just people, none of us, not one, are any better than another.

There was a point in my life when I really cared about fitting in.

Then I started being me and it was everything I dreamt it could be.

Step out of the box society puts you in.

You are born as an original. Dont die a copy.

In the words of Terrence McKenna: Culture is not your friend.

reply to post by billy197300
If you would care to read the post again you will see I passed no judgement on any individual, I merely stated the fact that everything free for everyone is unsustainable.

kind regards

reply to post by Bodhi911
I refer you to my reply to billy

reply to post by hotel1


I couldn't agree more.

The fact that certain people want to be the go to people for social definition is just dumb IMO.

It is not like they are even necessary. I have been on a kick of Basque poetry and found one Gem from the 1500´s which shows the extent of marginalized society and its progressive views, BEFORE the founders of ours even allowed the mention of these concepts. They take them and try to make them their own, but in the same style they repressed humanity before. EXTREMISM......

IN DEFENCE OF WOMEN

Bernat Etxepare, 1545

Speak no ill of women, by my love;

If men let them alone, they'd do no wrong.

Many men speak ill of them,

Talking in a light and dishonest way.

They'd be better off in silence,

Women would do no wrong were there no men.

Few sane men there are who slang them,

It is more honest to speak well of them.

Why must they be criticised?

Big and small, we are all born of them.

To blame women is not brave,

Or to equal them all to criticize but one.

A man thus behaving would be better off mute,

And deserves not to have been fed milk.

He who blames women should think

Where he and all of us are born from,

I would ask him if he was born of woman or not.

If only for her, he should praise them all.

Women are always a benefit for men,

By them we all come to the world;

If she didn't bring us up, we'd die on birth,

And when we've grown up, we still need her.

When we are healthy, through her we dress and eat,

When we're ill, we're lost without her,

When we die, who will weep for us like a woman?

We need her at all times, there's no doubt.

Where there's no woman, I see nothing pleasing,

Neither man nor the home is tended to,

Disorder reigns throughout the house.

I care not for paradise if there's no women there.

Never have I heard that women attack men first,

Rather that it's man who offends the woman.

Evil always pours from men,

Why then are women to be blamed?

Men should have more virtue

I see more of it among women;

There are a thousand bad men for every bad woman,

For every virtuous man there are a thousand women.

If we believed men, there'd be no good women,

They can't help attacking them even if they're good.

But there are many women who avoid men,

Because virtue is much greater amongst them.

Never have I heard of a woman forcing a man,

It's the man who chases the woman like a fool.

If any should approach him lovingly,

Must man blame her for this?

God loves women more than anything on earth;

He came down from heaven for love of one.

It was a woman who made Him our brother,

And through her, all women are worthy of praise.

I think a woman is something sweet,

Something charming in all her charms,

She supplies great pleasure by night and by day.

Great villainy it is to speak ill of her.

There's nothing so pretty and pleasurable

As a naked woman beneath the man,

Surrendered with wide open arms,

So a man can do with her as he please.

Though he harms her with his dart in her body,

She will complain less than would an angel.

The dart once relaxed and healed the wound,

The power of her charms reconciles them.

Can there be any so coarse as not to see this

And who can blame her for this?

It is not a well bred man who behaves thus

Because he does not the good that women do.

Translation: Toni Strubell
Original version: EMAZTEN FABORE

www.basquepoetry.net...



So there you have it 500 years ago what is a repressed society by the ones to set the standard, spoke of progressive issues that the countries of the west are just coming to terms with, yet they want to be an authority on it. Mind your place.....you PC Nazis.

Your last paragraph sure made a strong point. While I don't feel the need to stick up for women and lbgt rights, I will not go out of my way to demonize or try to hold them back. We are who we are, and as long as there is not a direct threat posed to me and my loved ones, I will respect and even tolerate others point of view. Saying that promotion of women and gay rights by those in power to subverse the traditional family unit for tax purposes is a very strong statement. One that I havn't fully wrapped my head around. If that tactic truly holds water, it is very clever because I cant bring myself to stand in the way of people fighting to be themselves and live better lives. Despite how much I hate the tightening stranglehold of the government. This, your last sentence, if is in fact true, would be the perfect example of people being strangled by their own devise.

reply to post by AnimositisominA
That was the central essence of the point, I would not condemn anyone for being who they are, I would just point out there is a societal price for the lifestyle we choose. It would be naive to assume that we can all indulge ourselves without consequence.