It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HostileApostle
I thought the Right was complaining about Obama spending too much money?
And now they want him to spend more?
Oh right, they want it spent on killing people overseas, not helping Americans here at home, I forgot.
Originally posted by HostileApostle
reply to post by Destinyone
There is a consulate in Benghazi, not an embassy.
Do you know the difference?
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by HostileApostle
I thought the Right was complaining about Obama spending too much money?
And now they want him to spend more?
Oh right, they want it spent on killing people overseas, not helping Americans here at home, I forgot.
Ah, the Alinsky Model is motion.
On topic is that they had the funds to provide the requested security. Requested twice. And the Chairwoman during last weeks hearings stated the security was not denied due to lack of funding.
But, like you did on the other thread, you will just spin what ever, try to deflect, blame Bush and totally admonish 0bama and his people from any wrong doings.
The 0bama fanboys really are struggling.
edit on 15-10-2012 by macman because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HostileApostle
reply to post by Destinyone
So I guess you don't understand the difference.
Let me ask you something else.
Would increased security in Tripoli help someone in Benghazi? More specifically, the "increase" that was requested was a DC-3 airplane, how exactly was a DC-3 airplane going to stop the attacks that took place?
Originally posted by HostileApostle
reply to post by Destinyone
Oh, I'd love for you to answer it as well.
You can even copy/paste if you claim it has already been answered.
Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by jibeho
I would love to repost this.
However I don't see any mainstream news outlets carrying the story.
Google news search only mentions your website.
we need more sources.
Naaa...I'm through playing games with you. I don't like posting with someone who has zero empathy for 4 murdered Americans.
Chevy Volts For War-Torn Vienna, Nothing For Benghazi Read More At IBD: news.investors.com...
Priorities: While our consulate in Benghazi was guarded by unarmed Libyan contractors making $4 an hour, our embassy in Vienna received an expensive charging station for its new electric cars to help fight climate change. Read More At IBD: news.investors.com...
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by jibeho
HERE'S what the Obama administration has been hoarding and spending the $2.2 Billion Embassy security funds for:
THESE PEOPLE ARE INSANE!
Chevy Volts For War-Torn Vienna, Nothing For Benghazi Read More At IBD: news.investors.com...
Priorities: While our consulate in Benghazi was guarded by unarmed Libyan contractors making $4 an hour, our embassy in Vienna received an expensive charging station for its new electric cars to help fight climate change. Read More At IBD: news.investors.com...
news.investors.com...
Not only does every Chevy Volt come with a $7,500 tax credit, but now taxpayers will also be boosting their sales numbers as the feds start to purchase them through the Department of Defense in order to ‘green up’ the military.
The Chevy Volt, the plug-in car that has been plagued by sluggish sales and mounting losses since General Motors rolled it out in 2010, has one deep-pocketed customer: the Pentagon.
The Department of Defense is planning to purchase 1,500 electric cars including Volts as part of its effort to make the military more environmentally friendly. But given the federal government’s bailout of Chevy maker General Motors, President Obama’s praise of the Volt and the car’s long-running problems, the federal purchase is likely to become the latest controversy in the Volt’s short life. …
Those sales will be boosted at taxpayer expense. The Department of Defense began buying Volts this summer as the Marine Corps Air Station in Miramar, Calif., purchased two in July. Another 18 Volts will soon be delivered to Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, where Air Force One is based, according to military magazine Stars and Stripes.
So, let me get this straight: The defense budget is looking at billions of dollars in budget cuts to create a “leaner military” over the next decade, and Secretary Panetta has said that the upcoming half-a-trillion sequester would be a “disaster” as-is, but now we’re using our limited defense funds to buy cars that the free market is rejecting in order to prop up the Obama administration’s green agenda? …Is this real life?
To power its electric vehicles, the military is installing the quick charging points at many of its bases.
Opconnect, a company that makes electric vehicle charging stations, announced earlier this year that it would install them at Navy bases in Washington; Indian Head, Md.; and San Diego.
Racasner, the Air Force spokeswoman, said fewer than 50 charging points for road-capable electric vehicles have been installed on military bases, but more are planned.
The Air Force, for example, is installing charging stations at Maryland’s Joint Base Andrews; at Los Angeles Air Force Base, which is preparing to take delivery of 41 new electric vehicles; and at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado, which will soon receive a pair of electric trucks.
Officials are pondering other locations for recharging stations and how to fund them, Racasner said.
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by NorEaster
No one else is buying Volts so now the govt. is buying them. Yes the State Department and also the Pentagon
NOT BS
How is this for smart spending
Not only does every Chevy Volt come with a $7,500 tax credit, but now taxpayers will also be boosting their sales numbers as the feds start to purchase them through the Department of Defense in order to ‘green up’ the military.
The Chevy Volt, the plug-in car that has been plagued by sluggish sales and mounting losses since General Motors rolled it out in 2010, has one deep-pocketed customer: the Pentagon.
The Department of Defense is planning to purchase 1,500 electric cars including Volts as part of its effort to make the military more environmentally friendly. But given the federal government’s bailout of Chevy maker General Motors, President Obama’s praise of the Volt and the car’s long-running problems, the federal purchase is likely to become the latest controversy in the Volt’s short life. …
Those sales will be boosted at taxpayer expense. The Department of Defense began buying Volts this summer as the Marine Corps Air Station in Miramar, Calif., purchased two in July. Another 18 Volts will soon be delivered to Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, where Air Force One is based, according to military magazine Stars and Stripes.
So, let me get this straight: The defense budget is looking at billions of dollars in budget cuts to create a “leaner military” over the next decade, and Secretary Panetta has said that the upcoming half-a-trillion sequester would be a “disaster” as-is, but now we’re using our limited defense funds to buy cars that the free market is rejecting in order to prop up the Obama administration’s green agenda? …Is this real life?
hotair.com...
GSA bought over 100 Volts last year
freebeacon.com...
Gotta Charge those Golf Carts somehow...
To power its electric vehicles, the military is installing the quick charging points at many of its bases.
Opconnect, a company that makes electric vehicle charging stations, announced earlier this year that it would install them at Navy bases in Washington; Indian Head, Md.; and San Diego.
Racasner, the Air Force spokeswoman, said fewer than 50 charging points for road-capable electric vehicles have been installed on military bases, but more are planned.
The Air Force, for example, is installing charging stations at Maryland’s Joint Base Andrews; at Los Angeles Air Force Base, which is preparing to take delivery of 41 new electric vehicles; and at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado, which will soon receive a pair of electric trucks.
Officials are pondering other locations for recharging stations and how to fund them, Racasner said.
Just another biased source
www.stripes.com...
I swear, it's as if no one here has ever worked for an actual bureaucratic organization before. You idiots actually think that Obama has any idea about - let alone input in on - the minute workings of the State Department's embassy security management process?
Originally posted by NorEaster
reply to post by jibeho
You really dislike the US. It's very obvious.
Originally posted by NorEaster
There's no actual connection between President Obama and the State Dept's foreign service operation, and definitely no connection between the WH and the management of embassy security funds.
Originally posted by NorEaster
reply to post by jibeho
You really dislike the US. It's very obvious.
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by NorEaster
I swear, it's as if no one here has ever worked for an actual bureaucratic organization before. You idiots actually think that Obama has any idea about - let alone input in on - the minute workings of the State Department's embassy security management process?
Wake up !!!! Just look at the blame game that is being played between the State Dept, the White House and the Intel Community right now. That should tell you something!!! They can't pass it off fast enough. Obama is trying to leave the ball in HIllary's lap right after he backs his campaign bus over her. Not a good move.