posted on Oct, 17 2012 @ 03:49 PM
reply to post by edgecrusher2199
Did you look (or read) that thread? I have contributed to it from the begining.
It was discussed there....but I just don't think the average ATS viewer is up to the task of tackling that 708 page giant. It is an incredible
resource on Yellowstone and I KNEW these quakes would obviously be talked about there, but for anything out of the norm, a new thread is typically
started by one of us 'regulars' to let the 'general public' of ATS know about it.
If you really want to start a rant thread about useless topics here on ATS, there is a VAST resource at your disposal. I agree that things have gone
downhill in the past year or so, which is one of the big reasons I am not here that much anymore. So I go ahead and make a new thread after a hiatus
to share with my friends a topic I know we like to discuss and I get atacked by several people I have never even had an exchange with (to my
knowledge) in the three years I have been here.
Out of all the poorly worded, un-researched, hyped-up, ridculous topics/posts here, you choose MINE to slam?
Unless you actually have something to contribute to the TOPIC of this thread, which is a POSSIBLE swarm at Yellowstone...than kindly post elsewhere.
Doesn't mean you have to agree with me, but if you don't, than in following with the old tradition on here of usefull conversation, back it up with
something other than insults..
edit on 17-10-2012 by westcoast because: (no reason given)