It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by ImaFungi
Actually this is consistent with what could be verified technologically by Astrophysics in 1985 .
For the record Cygnus X3 is 37,000 light years from Earth
Any thoughts?
edit on 14-10-2012 by Kashai because: Added content
Originally posted by inverslyproportional
So the ability of any particle to exist in the space occupied by a singularity could not ever be of any particle type at all, only energy, as any amount of energy can occupy any space. It would only increase the energy, therefore the mass of the given space.
At the center of a black hole as described by general relativity lies a gravitational singularity, a region where the spacetime curvature becomes infinite.[54] For a non-rotating black hole, this region takes the shape of a single point and for a rotating black hole, it is smeared out to form a ring singularity lying in the plane of rotation.[55]In both cases, the singular region has zero volume. It can also be shown that the singular region contains all the mass of the black hole solution.[56] The singular region can thus be thought of as having infinite density.
Got to love it when new questions pop up. They are the driving force of science.
They pull spacetime itself backwards faster than light can travel through it. Which is a very interesting thought in and of itself. Which means space time itself is also being "stored" away inside.
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by TeslaandLyne
Nontheless consider a quark star compressed to the size of a dime inside a black hole made by a star. Any matter entering the black hole would experience spaghettification. The issue being can a quark be split?
And what would be the result....
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by Kashai
It means the object is moving neutrons ( a type of matter) so close to the speed of light, it is possible they are actually moving at the speed of light
Such a determination would violate Einsteins theory. But further, we know of no particle or process that would accelerate a particle to speeds like that in nature.
Any thought?
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by inverslyproportional
Spaghettification presents that matter entering a black hole could experience infinite density, so therefore becoming energy.
When one starts a fire, photons are released from the matter one is burning, could a black hole turn matter completely into photons? Understand that I know, in relation to modem thought that comment is a stretch.
But in relation to matter/anti-matter interactions what else is left??
Any thoughts?
I would have presumed that astrophysicists would have weighed the matter entering the hole and balanced that against the output of photons. If it doesn't weigh up then that matter is translating into something else. Maybe another universe.
edit on 15-10-2012 by Kashai because: modified content