It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Phage
The Pleiades is not directly overhead at 38º N. It is about 68º above the horizon at its highest at this time of year.
reply to post by eriktheawful
The Pleiades (aka The Seven Sisters), can and do appear to be almost directly over head at night during this time of year....YES even at 38 deg N.
Do you all want to work this out amongst yourselves before strutting it on the boulevard or will you be needing arbitration?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by eriktheawful
I was set up wrong. Pleiades is peaking at 76º now.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by luxordelphi
What's the problem? 68º is quite close to overhead but it is not directly overhead.
But I forget, you have a problem with spatial relationships.
So 68 degrees is the same as 90 degrees? 76 degrees is the same as 90 degrees?
So 68 degrees is the same as 90 degrees? 76 degrees is the same as 90 degrees? I have a new signature for you: Everything is the same as everything else.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by luxordelphi
What's the problem? 68º is quite close to overhead but it is not directly overhead.
But I forget, you have a problem with spatial relationships.
So 68 degrees is the same as 90 degrees? 76 degrees is the same as 90 degrees? I have a new signature for you: Everything is the same as everything else.
I was set up wrong. Pleiades is peaking at 76º now.
I was going by memory. Fall and Winter are my favorite times to star watch. But I just checked my program, and yah, it's sitting at about 76 deg.
That's why I asked you what instrument you used to measure the elevation. Without precise measurements, you are making a subjective observation. Subjectively, anything can be anything else.
The angle of a celestial object measured upwards from the observer's horizon. Thus, an object on the horizon has an altitude of 0° and one directly overhead has an altitude of 90°.
The zenith is the point on the celestial sphere directly overhead the observer. It has an altitude of +90o in the horizontal coordinate system.
The moon is always over there its never directly overhead.
If you've never seen the Moon directly overhead, it's almost certain you've never seen the Sun directly overhead, either. The Moon orbits at an angle that varies between 18 and 28 degrees relative to the equator. If you lived at 28 degrees latitude or lower (southern Florida or further South), the Moon could be located directly overhead. Or, if you lived in the Southern hemisphere above 28 degrees South latitude, you'd occasionally see the Moon directly overhead (Brazil, Peru, etc).
That's right. And they don't.
Why is this significant: The Pleiades, the moon, the sun and zodiac stars all travel within a certain area - the ecliptic - from our earth point of view. At mid-latitudes, like 38 degrees N, they should never appear directly overhead.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by luxordelphi
That's right. And they don't.
Why is this significant: The Pleiades, the moon, the sun and zodiac stars all travel within a certain area - the ecliptic - from our earth point of view. At mid-latitudes, like 38 degrees N, they should never appear directly overhead.
Last night, for me, the moon was within 2-3 degrees of directly overhead.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by luxordelphi
That's right. And they don't.
Why is this significant: The Pleiades, the moon, the sun and zodiac stars all travel within a certain area - the ecliptic - from our earth point of view. At mid-latitudes, like 38 degrees N, they should never appear directly overhead.
Because of the return of Planet X, these objects are intermittantly appearing directly overhead from mid-latitudes. This is one proof of the return. Last night, for me, the moon was within 2-3 degrees of directly overhead. The Pleiades was too obscured (chemtrails) to see.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by luxordelphi
Although you claim to be replying to me, you still haven't answered my question: What instrument did you use? If you did not use an instrument, your observation is meaningless. You cannot observe an object at the zenith while standing upright. Unless you are a mutant, your neck is incapable of bending at a ninety degree angle. That is why objects above (around) sixty degrees elevation appear to be "overhead."
I guess you've never heard of lawn chairs. They can be extended and flattened so that they are perpendicular to the zenith (90 degrees or, more commonly - directly overhead.) (I was out waiting for the libration event lol.) I'm asking myself, at this moment, what's wrong with this picture? And I'm answering myself saying that I think I've stumbled into a circus.
So, you measured the altitude of a celestial body to within three degrees by using... a lawn chair. Why do navigators waste so much money on sextants, I wonder?
When are we expecting to see this imaginary planet, sir? I want to know how long I have to get Faith Hill to accept my proposal.