Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun carbon dated to 25,000 years old., page 4

reply to post by Sublimecraft

---

That leaf does not make the pyramid the same age.
It makes the leaf 25000 years old, that's all!

Here is a 51.9 million year old leaf.
It is not uncommon...

I'm fairly new to this, but if the levels of stone work in the picture gallery are real, then surely there is a man made structures beneath?

Or is it all just a big scam?

www.piramidasunca.ba...#

They look like levels on a pyramid type structure, they look like tunnels, they look like big round balls, that big strange round thing looks like a big strange round thing. What have I missed to show me that these are fake?

Originally posted by Alchemst7
reply to post by LetsGoViking

---

Pyramid or not, are you denying the artifacts and tunnels they are finding at the sight? So its not geoemetrically a pyramid shape, there is some type of ancient building/artifact being discovered.

Caves..
People have been living, and taking shelter in caves for 1000's of years.

If I toss a soda-can in the cave.
And somebody finds it there many years later.
It doesn't make it my home.
It doesn't make it a building I build.

reply to post by Acidtastic

---

There are a lot of nature made structures.
That looks like they was man made.
Just take a look at these.

Originally posted by tomten
reply to post by Sublimecraft

---

That leaf does not make the pyramid the same age.
It makes the leaf 25000 years old, that's all!

Here is a 51.9 million year old leaf.
It is not uncommon...

Well that is a fossil of a leaf, the claim I guess is an unfossilzed leaf.
How it survived for 25 thousand years is beyond me, how was the leaf preserved? Fossils can't be carbon dated, they need carbon in them.

Originally posted by tomten
reply to post by Acidtastic

---

There are a lot of nature made structures.
That looks like they was man made.
Just take a look at these.

Doesn't actually mean that this is the case here though. yes, lots of natural formations can look like they were constructed, and visa versa. But they are different objects, and until this molehill/mountain has some more digging done, then I'm not ready to call it fake, just because other things which are natural, elsewhere in the world, look a bit man made, doesn't mean it has to be the same here. This could be something which looks natural, but is man made. Maybe it was a hill which has had tiers cut into it, like the rice fields in the mountain of Sapa. Maybe it's not anywhere near 25000 years old. It wouldn't supprise me if it was. We know so little, but think we know so much. Vedic writings date civilisation to much earlier than 25k, they may be fabricated but you never know. We could be much older than we're being told. And I think we are.

reply to post by Sublimecraft

---

This is incredible,I have been interested in the world's pyramids for quite a while now and have mapped out their corellation to each other in terms of being linked by leylines.It is astonishing just how many pyramids are built on the site of a major leyline confluence.

Personally I believe that the pyramids are "capacitors" deliberately placed to utilise the Earths magnetic field,most likely as a means of "anti gravity" travel.Now what distances could be traversed using this propulsion method is the interesting part,I would suggest that they could certainly allow hyper speed travel all over the planet,and if the allignments with other star systems can be identified conclusively,perhaps they also allow for inter stellar travel by "communicating" with a similar arrangement of pyramids on planets within the relevant star system.


Another 3 pyramids to investigate for leyline confluences!

Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by thePharaoh

---

In this case Pharaod you are partially correct. The date is probably right but the material has nothing to do with the date of the hill.

The hill was formed during the Miocene and the layers date from 15 to 7 millions years ago....

Where those hills come from


As for your fear of the C-14 dating

edit on 14/10/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)

I'm going with 'Hanslune' on this one.
I feel relatively confident that this is a natural formation and not true 'built' pyramids. This has been the subject of some controversy for a while. While it would be cool to find pyramids in Bosnia, I don't think these are them.

reply to post by demongoat

---

It's not the first time that the Osmanagic team has been fooled - or should we say "has tried to fool us"? - by this kind of pseudo-datation: irna.lautre.net... and irna.lautre.net... They have no geologist, nor any real archaeologist. And when they had one, they tried to edit his report about the radiocarbon datation which pointed various problems: irna.lautre.net...

reply to post by Fineousstitch

---

The wold is millions probably billions of years old, what are you talking about?

reply to post by Sublimecraft

---

I think it is not covered by msm because no one finds it interesting. They find political mud flinging and celebrity gossip more interesting. I do not think it is much of a cover up to protect modern "academia"

Remember the news is for entertainment and behavior modification not for actual information.

..and not to mention carbon dating can be unreliable.

reply to post by 3NL1GHT3N3D1

---

They are pyramids, there is plenty of proof of that. Just because tptb, the countries owning the present pyramid tourism industry, don't admit it doesn't mean they aren't real. The motive for denying their existance is strictly economics. They are afraid they will lose a percentage of their tourist industry. Countries of the old USSR aren't considered worthy of having the extra income by those of the Capitalistic societies of the world. Would you expect anything different?

I know Sam and I have met some people who have worked at the pyramid site. Notice I said pyramid site and not suspected pyramid site. People are so vane to believe that tptb in this field would not deny the truth at the risk of giving up a piece of the pie. The pyramids in China are real also as are the ones in the ocean by Japan. Not all pyramids were built the same exact way either. At least the Bosnian pyramids have most of their face stones intact. The other pyramids are mostly stripped, a sign of people who desired an easy life when building the other structures around Egypt and Gaza. I suppose it is recycling

reply to post by DCPatriot

---

The stones of the Bosnian Pyramids are manmade concrete. It is a very high quality concrete incorporating clay. This technology was used in Italy up until about 200 AD but the ones using it disappeared. Some old Churches up north used this technology of concrete after the Romans lost it, meaning that the people with the knowledge moved North, leaving Italy and Egypt. The Concrete used in Bosnia is the old type, maybe the pyramid builders moved to the south during the glacier times. I hope that they find out what culture of people these people turned into. Maybe they were built by an extinct race of beings now. Who knows. I traced the cement technology, they are going to start making this type of cement again. It is way stronger than regular cement, a two inch slab without reinforcement is stronger than six inches of reinforced concrete. The patents have been acquired already, I guess you can patent something ancient without worrying about the people creating it suing you

In a regional publication "4DPortal" Hrvoje Zujić, a scientist, published his experiment. He measured electrical voltage over Bosnian pyramid and recorded proportional relation of voltage with height of the pyramid. Here is a LINK to a report, however it is written in a Croatian language, wich is basicilly the same like bosnian and serbian language. Recommend using translation tool, such as one from google.

EDIT: Also, note that they have found system of underground tunnels in and arround the pyramid:
Interresting footage of ancient pyramid @ 5:45

reply to post by Echtelion

---

Carbon dating a leaf stuck to the concrete is a little speculative, I'll admit that. I believe they are structures that were built by humanoids though. I also don't think they are the earliest pyramids. I think they are going to find much older ones but they will be smaller.

Some of the old pyramids are built over old buildings, I read that somewhere. One has a building built over another building in it. Seems the people of the time were taking advantage of certain places with geomagnetic abnormalities for some reason. I don't know the reason. The old Catholic churches are also built over these kind of geomagnetic abnormalities which were built over pagan holy sites Their steeples put out similar frequencies. I'm not sure what they were trying to do but I know that these frequencies attract people. They also scare some people away because they feel uneasy.

More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags

Egypt\'s Ancient Fleet: Lost for Thousands of Years, Discovered in Cave
  Posted 17 days ago with 95 member flags

Arizona man finds what he believes will change American prehistoric history....
  Posted 19 days ago with 56 member flags

The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags

63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags

Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags

Plantagenet Legacy Paved Over??? Presidents, Christianity, And Hidden History.
  Posted 11 days ago with 18 member flags

The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: