Global warming stopped 16 years ago, reveals Met Office report quietly released...

reply to post by BlindBastards


You should see a lot of my friends. Every time I say something even close to this, they start yelling at me about how Global Warming is a serious issue and needs to be stopped. Those that believe in Global Warming simply are gullible and have no common sense, and truly? It's their problem, if they don't want to listen to true logic, thats fine. Sooner or later they will realize that Global Warming really is a lie, and they will feel dumb as hell for yelling at me when I tried to explain.

reply to post by wirehead


Here you go!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by TehSlenderMan


I feel ya, mate. But please count me as one who is ready to use a bit of logic instead of blind-fully believing everything the Big Paid Media tells us.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

What’s cooking on the Sun? I asked Mark Miesch, a solar physicist at NCAR’s High Altitude Observatory, what he thought. “The results do indeed suggest that the Sun is doing something unusual,” he says. Miesch agrees that the three sets of data presented at the AAS all point to a systematic decrease in solar activity and a disruption of the normal 11-year sunspot cycle.

from the High Altitude Obseratory www2.ucar.edu...

?what's cookin' on the sun? ... funny scientists!

reply to post by Renegade2283


This is the same exact chart as described in the OP. I don't get where you are refuting anything. This shows that there has only been a .75 degree celcius increase since 1880. ??

With this stated it almost defeats the rest of your statement as I am viewing it as a stalemate. Considering both of the grapsh you posted disply only since 1880 I don't see how this can be taken as proof of man made global warming.

Why? Because quite frankly the Earth is billions of years old. 133 years simply is not enough time to determine anything. I have seen evidence both ways on this. It simply depends on what side the 'scientists' are leaning on how the data leans.

**Your graph just looks worse because of the steeper slope. It's just the same info shown differently. See how skewing something can twist it towars your point of view?

What kind of statistics can be done with a time slice of 16 years? If you were trying to prove anything It would probably be better to start by looking at polar Ice layers for patterns. You need a reliable stable long term base of data to analyze.


Found this in a quick search so I'm not sure of the accuracy.

647,995 B.C. - Greenhouse Gases Trivia / Planet Earth - "A core of ice nearly two miles long from the underbelly of Antarctica shows that levels of the greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and methane have not been so high as they are today [11/25/05] for 650,000 years. The research is published in today's issue [11/25/05] of the journal Science. It shows that the level of carbon dioxide today is 7 percent higher than it has been in the last 650,000 years. And the level of methane, an even more powerful greenhouse gas, is 130 percent higher, said Thomas Stocker, a climate researcher at the University of Bern and senior member of the European ice-coring team that wrote two papers based on the core. [....]" [Based on: Los Angeles Times article by Usha Lee McFarling (Greenhouse gases are much higher now, ice cores show), p. A7, S.L.P.D., 11/25/05]

Originally posted by Renegade2283
reply to post by ollncasino

 

However do you notice that in the past republican politicians would deny global warming, but now since there is so much irrefutable evidence, they don't dare deny it for fears they will be made a fool

-Have a nice day

I think the reason they don't deny it now is more due to the pressure put on them by their puppeteers that pull the strings. There's so much money to be made by the greedy elitists with this whole carbon tax bull#, and THAT'S why politicians (and anyone else who has a financial interest) will try and lead the masses toward that end.

reply to post by ollncasino


Pollution is a bad thing. Temperatures fluctuate

reply to post by ollncasino


You might wanna take a look at my most recent thread:www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Renegade2283


Just one question.

Why does it have to be the slow destruction of the planet?

Are you saying that the earth has always been the same?

Why cannot the earth change? Just because the human species is happy with the temperature?

OK, I know that that is more than one question, but the whole destruction thing is seriously misleading.

Time to get off of the propaganda Wheaties friend.

Originally posted by atlasastro
reply to post by Honor93

 

We had an extended minimum Einstien. Extended means longer. Which means your math doesn't add up.
Hardly surprising.

I know it is difficult to keep up with real science when all you look at is blogs and denial propoganda.

as usual ... blah, blah, blah without a link.
you want to convince anyone, including me --> share some facts ... if you have any.

reply to post by ElectricUniverse

Apologies for going off topic, but I just had to respond to such blatant lies...

yep, that's exactly what prompted this response.

the skinheads you talk about have democrat values, they are the same people from the old south who wanted to keep slavery because they wanted free labour

the only skinheads i've ever met, like the ones you mentioned, were all Northerners.

and with regard to the KKK ... yeppers, that David Duke guy and KKK Grand Wizard is one shifty dude, isn't he ??
seems he has been welcomed and representative of both parties ... Dems and Reps
www.ask.com...

but, leave it to your rant to yet again attempt to re-write history that you claim others aren't aware

am just guessing here but i'd suppose you know nothing of the aerosol "ban" of the 70s ??
the great eco-movement to reduce depletion of the ozone layer puuuuhleeeez
yeah right, just how many aerosols are on market shelves today ????

it was all just an eco-scam to have the public pay for the re-packaging, re-branding and re-distribution of old products that generated new revenues ... this, my friend, is a very old dialogue and overly used tactic.

perhaps you should look a bit deeper than the tip-sheets your political party provides.

reply to post by ollncasino


with increased co2 its not global warming that you get

it's a misnomer


its really an increase in extremes of weather hot/cold and all variables

it should be named global extreme not global warming

it wont be long where nobody will deny this

and

the tectonic plates had an equalibrian also but dambs, big cities, nuke tests, floods, melting ice and other things changed that too

earth quakes not even seen in primordial times will try and bring balance, will you know then that humans are meant to know from logic its not an infinite world, it like all things it has a balance, if we breed like flies we will die like ? what

its not rocket science just logic

the overpopulated countries population will fall hard when the balance is restored

we get what we deserve, in this life or the next, we live in what we created, no escape