Let me help you out, Anunaki. Doris Jakobsen is a Danish MP representing a constituency in Greenland. Judging by her appearance, she is Inuit, what
Americans might call "Eskimo." Presumably, she is a descendant of one of the natives tribes that were relocated in the 1950s so that the US could
construct Thule Airbase. You have heard a rumor that some Danes, presumably made some sort of threat to damage her career if she pestered American
officers about Thule. I am following you so far.
Now, what is the nature of Ms. Jakobsen's interest in the Airbase? There are several issues surrounding it, but you have not made clear which one
resulted in the threat. Was it:
1. She holds the US responsible for relocating her people and wants them to reimburse them?
2. She believes that the radiation released by the crash of an SAC bomber in 1968 has caused more illness than the Danish government has admitted, and
wants to open a new investigation?
3. She believes that nuclear weapons are still deployed at the base and wants them removed?
In the first case, Denmark considers the move to be their own responsibility, and are dealing with the issue in court. They do not consider the US to
be involved. After all, Denmark signed a treaty, so Denmark is ultimately responsible. If it is the second, I wish her the best of luck. The
population affected was very small, so epidemiological data should be very easy to gather. If it's the last, there is no need for the US to have
nuclear weapons there any more.
The base has been used as part of the American missile defense early warning system since its construction. It is being integrated into the "Star
Wars" system even now. This raises the possibility that the US is planning on basing anti-missile missiles there. Is that
what Ms. Jakobsen is
concerned about? If it is, you may have an excellent thread on your hands. Not many ATS members are concerned about Inuit issues, but I think many are
opposed to the "Star Wars" missile defense program, especially if it involves covert deployment!
Star and flag for a potentially excellent thread. Now please don't ruin it!
Edit to add: Oh, I see you've already started to ruin it while I was typing this.
edit on 13-10-2012 by DJW001 because: (no reason
edit on 13-10-2012 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)