David Icke was right about Jimmy Savile

sorry i,m still trying to grasp the fact hes accused of what everyone says.....the excuse is he was oh so powerful?jimmy saville hasn,t been a celebrity since the late 80s...so why oh so powerful?......hes been dead for over a year and now 1 person comes out and accuses him of something and then we get waves of them?even the starter of childline says she heard rumours?....if thats the case and things are proved to be true then she should be held accountable herself should she not?surely u can,t know about something like that and not speak up till someone else does.

So there really are snakes on those planes Mr. Icke?

We all know how this works fellas. If the MSM tries to discredit somebody, they are probably telling the truth.

Originally posted by Morg234

Actually we are all The Son of God. People often misunderstand what people like Jesus meant. When you have that experience of merging with God you ARE ALL.

reply to post by Dustytoad

 

Actually the purpose of this site is to at least try and deny ignorance.

You should try it sometime.. Meanwhile, I will keep searching for the truth, and finding it. One liner posts are frowned upon, and ignorance is mostly spread by lack of communication. Maybe you could clarify what your thoughts are?

I'm not a follower. I found this thing I call God. It is not the Christian God, that has actions. It is the energy that set forth the big bang. Only an ignorant man could look at the first few lines in the Old testament and miss the science that is being talked about.

Starting a sentence with actually, doesn't really bode well for ones intelligence to be judging others who may just know more than you. It's especially odd of you to say, when I made no claims about the purpose of this site.

Read my Signature. That is YOUR purpose.

Originally posted by sparky31
sorry i,m still trying to grasp the fact hes accused of what everyone says.....the excuse is he was oh so powerful?jimmy saville hasn,t been a celebrity since the late 80s...so why oh so powerful?......hes been dead for over a year and now 1 person comes out and accuses him of something and then we get waves of them?even the starter of childline says she heard rumours?....if thats the case and things are proved to be true then she should be held accountable herself should she not?surely u can,t know about something like that and not speak up till someone else does.

Surely it happens all the time.. Look at the Sandusky case..

Another point I disagree with, is your view on power. It's not about who knows you (celebrity) it is about who you know that gives you power.

Power is knowledge and money.. If he had those he had power.

reply to post by Dustytoad


He was also put in charge of running Broadmoor psychiatric hospital in 1988. Now that's all a bit weird. His own keys to a psychiatric hospital. You couldnt make this up

Originally posted by Screwed
***snip***
This is a much MUCH bigger problem than alot of people realize or even want to accept.
I promise you that you know at least one. and I also promise you that when you find out, you'll say "I never would have guessed" or "that can't be true".
***snip***

You are right about this. I worked with a guy for seven years and we occasionally spoke about the wrongs on the Interweb. Sometimes about child pornography. He was strongly against it and was publicly disgusted.

It turned out that he was downloading and sharing child porn.

His defense was that it happened gradually and that he wasn't aware of it.
But he got it from sites where he had to pay for access.

We were all shocked to hear about his case and were thankful that his two small daughters were safe. Apparantly he hadn't gotten that far into the paedophile community.

Would never had suspected.

Originally posted by sparky31
sorry i,m still trying to grasp the fact hes accused of what everyone says.....the excuse is he was oh so powerful?jimmy saville hasn,t been a celebrity since the late 80s...so why oh so powerful?......hes been dead for over a year and now 1 person comes out and accuses him of something and then we get waves of them?even the starter of childline says she heard rumours?....if thats the case and things are proved to be true then she should be held accountable herself should she not?surely u can,t know about something like that and not speak up till someone else does.

I've just a few days ago had the misfortune of witnessing something that MIGHT be an indication of child abuse (not sexual - but more mistreating and violence). Outwardly the man in question is a nice chap, caring and a bit strict.

I might misinterpret those signs, but recognizing the pattern from my own dad, made me make the connections. After a few sleepless nights I chose to tell a family member to keep an eye out for more signs.

So now I'm thinking - have I pointed a finger at someone without real evidence? Am I wrong?

And now the poor family member has his view on the chap tainted by my telling him.
What can he do? Should he act because of a rumour?

As it is now he (and I) can only wait until more rumours appear. Then we can put our information (as little as it is) forward. Only that way will the evidence be strong enough to warrant the possible ruin of an innocent man's reputation.

I'm just floored by the entire thread.

I'm not saying he DID. Im not saying he DIDN'T.

I'M saying it's a bit late for weeping women to throw accusations.

Do we get to increase the statute of limitations on such things? Because if that's been lifted I'm the long lost child lover of SIR Charles Chaplain. I need to file suit.

reply to post by woodwardjnr


Not only ran the place but also moved his caravan onto the grounds. With his own keys to the buildings?
I wonder how many children were brought to his caravan in wheel chairs ect at night time. What a night mare and this was going on for over 40 years? No one knew about it? How was it all kept silent? Masons? Police? High ranking members of this order control the courts police and are in govt. So if he was high up in the order, then they would have protected him. They swear an oath to do that. People made complaints about his actions and were dismissed out of hand. Police became involved in the cases and it was all smoothed over. No charges against him. This really needs a proper investigation and the police should not be doing it.

reply to post by magickmaster


as soon as you mention masons I know you are lying and making things up.

You all hater and skeptics! you all should know this...

People like Icke scare you!

It`s okey ! you should be scared! and if you`re not scared!? you should rethink your "view" on this corrupted world.

The real story about us human beings (slave race) are not told, we are thought that we are a unique, rare, one of a kind, one off and so on....

But we are not, we are like Ants!

Think about that.

Originally posted by SeenAlot

I'M saying it's a bit late for weeping women to throw accusations.

But there were people making accusations, for a very long time, that were ignored or brushed under the rug. Some of those people making the accusations of abuse today did so way back as well and were ignored or even pressured to shut the hell up about it.
Notice too that the family were very quick off the mark in removing his fancy monument from his grave, as soon as this started to blow up, before any investigation had even been launched. In other words, they knew the game was up and people have gone into damage control mode very quickly.

I still believe the freemasonry angle comes in to play here. I'm not talking about the local rotary club or the lodge down the road for the local councillors and businessmen, they are small fry and inconsequential to the high level organisations which I believe are global in reach. In such institutions, the big players do not necessarily need to be the big movers and shakers in the global business and control spotlight, but can easily be seemingly lowly characters, such as a wacky DJ!

Originally posted by Britguy

Originally posted by SeenAlot

I'M saying it's a bit late for weeping women to throw accusations.

But there were people making accusations, for a very long time, that were ignored or brushed under the rug. Some of those people making the accusations of abuse today did so way back as well and were ignored or even pressured to shut the hell up about it.
Notice too that the family were very quick off the mark in removing his fancy monument from his grave, as soon as this started to blow up, before any investigation had even been launched. In other words, they knew the game was up and people have gone into damage control mode very quickly.

I still believe the freemasonry angle comes in to play here. I'm not talking about the local rotary club or the lodge down the road for the local councillors and businessmen, they are small fry and inconsequential to the high level organisations which I believe are global in reach. In such institutions, the big players do not necessarily need to be the big movers and shakers in the global business and control spotlight, but can easily be seemingly lowly characters, such as a wacky DJ!

Yeah the gravestone went into the skip pretty quicky didnt it? This broadmoor thing is really alarming, why did he have keys? and god knows what he did there? I think theres much more to come out. He was buddies with royals until a "fall out" with Prince Philip, i wondered what happened there? Was the "fall out" them finding out about neferious ways? I cant believe they didnt know about it from the beginning.

reply to post by Cobaltic1978


To be perfectly honest, I think half the world was right about Jimmy Saville.

Anyone who knew anything about Jimmy Savile also knew the rumours.

The guy has a papal knighthood in addition to his other titles and used to spend Christmas with the Thatchers at Chequers ( Margaret Thatcher quoted as saying it isnt Christmas without Jimmy!!)

The grim reality is that this kind of behaviour was the subject of nudge nudge wink wink humour amongst people of the time.


For anyone who hasnt heard it here's a live recording of Savile toutching up a young girl whilst live on Radio ...apparently her parents were present and this was considered just a bit of fun!!

www.telegraph.co.uk...#

Obviously a stark contrast to waht we find acceptable in 2012 but it's a miracle that we dont find it highly suspcicious that the International BrotherHood of Man-Boy love ( AKA the Catholic Church) gave a KnightHood to a notorious child molsterer.
Was it for services rendered????

I'm 90% certain that it isn't just some BBC celebrities who will be revealed as predators, my hunch is that the cover-up is protecting a handful of politicians and police officers.

Time will tell. Or not.

www.standard.co.uk...

www.telegraph.co.uk...


More articles detailing the cover-up.

Originally posted by mr-lizard
I'm 90% certain that it isn't just some BBC celebrities who will be revealed as predators, my hunch is that the cover-up is protecting a handful of politicians and police officers.

Time will tell. Or not.

I'm betting in reality it goes much, much higher but we'll never find out.

Is that so?

i hate this thread
look,

david ike wasnt right.....your now just believing rumours, which, you would have before, dismissed!

whether ike was right or wrong, hasnt changed...only your perception has

peace