posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 03:37 PM
reply to post by tanda7
I think I'm just going to back off this thread and take my leave a bit early.
We're coming from the concept that Occupy and the movement around it was 100% non-violent, non-criminal and this fresh faced young girl MUST be pure
as the driven snow because she looks like everyone's next door neighbor.
Well.. B.S.. I watched on Live Stream for 3 months, almost nightly, what "non-criminal" activity was happening, nation wide. Not EVERY camp was
violent. Not EVERY camp was criminal and not everyone on May Day out there was committing crimes that she's a part of the investigation for.
HOWEVER, if someone wants to even JOKE about that movement being without blame or criminal liability.....There is no base of intellectual honesty to
even start from here. It's starting from a premise so provably false, it's bad to even joke on after all the nation watched.
She was given blanket immunity. SHE had ZERO chance of having anything whatsoever done to her. ZERO. ...until she violated the court by still refusing
to testify. Good. She made her choice. She can now live with that choice. That's life and sometimes, Life is hard. Welcome to it.
* that last part about no lawyer just hit me... PLEASE do some research on how the system works..and I don't mean just you...It's a GRAND JURY, NOT A
TRIAL. Lawyers ARE *NEVER ALLOWED* to be active and interfere with the proceedings of a Grand Jury and they can be thrown out if they don't get it.
Really.....we're talking apples and oranges if people think Grand Jury has ANYTHING to do with a Trial and the Jury that sits in a court room
preparing a verdict of guilty or not guilty. Night and Day different.
This has absolutely nothing remotely to do with a trial Jury. Same system...but that's about where the similarities come to a sudden halt.
edit on 12-10-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)