Large part of the reason why Creationist arguments against evolution can sound so persuasive is beca

Originally posted by theophilus40
You are absolutely right and many of the claims made by evolutionists can't be backed up by objective evidence because they involve things that happened in the past and there is no way to test them.

www.answersingenesis.org...

Could you please refer me to the part of that article that contains scientific studies? Evolution has all the scientific evidence on its side, while creationism has none. You might not like that, but it's a fact of reality and not a single person has ever posted a valid peer reviewed scientific paper that validates intelligent design or creationism. Answers in genesis is a biased creationist site that does not contain any scientific facts or objective evidence and is pretty easy to debunk.

www.talkorigins.org...

Could you be so kind as to explain which part of this link is wrong and why? Creationists swear up and down that evolution is wrong, but once confronted with the actual science they ignore it or run away from the argument. I've posted that link for a lot of creationists and not a single one has ever answered it.

We don't need to travel to the past to notice evolution. We have millions of fossils that all show slow change over time, including over a dozen of just hominids. Couple that with the absolute fact that genetic mutations happen and are observable in any creature on earth and the absolute fact of natural selection, it's a bit silly to deny evolution.