posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 09:00 AM
Because he was confrontational and disrespectful? Because he interupted Ryan on a regular basis? Because he was dismissive and condesending?
What exactly is the logic here?
Dems are excited that their 2nd in command could be a jerk to his counterpart? I'm just confused - is it because you felt the Commander in Chief
looked so weak and took a beating the last time that you needed to see someone on your side be an ass and make you feel tough again?
I ask you ONLY to reflect the on the "other foot". Had Ryan come in and interrupted Biden, had he laughed and dismissed him, had really gone for
the jugular on things like security leaks and Joe's inexplicable tendency to put his foot in his mouth?
Had he instead treated Joe like the senile old man he often acts... would you be ok with that? Would you be remolding that Joe got his butt kicked,
or would you be incensed at the disrespect shown?
Romney simply owned the first debate. He didn't do that by insulting or talking down to the President, he did that because he had a command of the
issues that Obama seemed to lack.
So the Dem response is to act like a jackass and bluster and interrupt....
When Biden is your champion - there is something deeply wrong. He failed to explain - even once - what Obama's plan was moving forward and instead
spent the ENTIRE debate trying to poke holes in Ryan.
It was sad, and useless. I can only wonder how the left is happy with this and feels this was a win.
In Obama's words from 2008:
And that's to be expected, because if you don't have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare voters.
Tell me folks, what did Biden do last night? Pretty sure there were no ideas he explained... in fact, his "memorable" quote was looking into the
camera and saying "Who are you going to trust... Me or Him?"
Fear mongering is all they have left.