My chemtrail observations over the years..., page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 15-10-2012 @ 05:13 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by lastword



sites proclaiming this are easy enough to find -

here - video

And Educate-Yourself says that Jeff Rense suggested this possibility.



reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 01:19 AM by CherubBaby
reply to post by aRogue



s/f I like this subject and before I go any further, I do believe there is something to the chem/con trail subject that is not above board but, regardless of whether it is con or chem my point is a simple point. They have no right spraying crap that turns to snot and retards your view of a starry night sky or a bright sunny day. Personally I think there is a multi sided potential in the spraying controversy and I can and will expand on that if asked to do so. Thanks again and keep your eyes open.
p.s. I took this picture last year



If you want to see this globally? Check this out.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 28-10-2012 by CherubBaby because: added info



reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 02:15 AM by UnlimitedSky
Originally posted by CherubBaby
reply to
post by aRogue



Personally I think there is a multi sided potential in the spraying controversy and I can and will expand on that if asked to do so. Thanks again and keep your eyes open.
p.s. I took this picture last year



If you want to see this globally? Check this out.

www.youtube.com...
edit on 28-10-2012 by CherubBaby because: added info


What a horrid sky to live under!

Yes, I would be very interested. If you can, please take the time and explain the multi sided motives in spraying us like crawling insects. I too, have my theories and would like to compare notes.


reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 02:44 AM by UnlimitedSky
reply to post by alfa1



To me it looks like a totally different thing. One lot is a clear broken line, the others have started breaking up but is still clearly continues without any clear blue sky interruptions.

Please explain to me specifically how you think these 'on/off' lines are naturally formed if they were contrails? To me it is most clear that this is a matter of the spray running out.

I kindly ask that we remain respectful towards each other. I ask this, because I find people with opposite views to those of us who dislike what they are doing to our sky, health and peace of mind through chemtrails often become sarcastic, rude and intolerant of the debaters who oppose their views. I admit that I have on occasion succumbed to their way of communication and do not like myself being pulled to that level. It brings out the worst in me and I don't like myself like that. So, lets keep bringing out the best in one another, ATSers and debate respectfully.

Thanking you in advance.

ps: I really would like your view on why some of these lines are so extremely broken up with nothing but blue sky filling the clear gaps.


reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 02:50 AM by UnlimitedSky
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to
post by abeverage



One of the theories about chemtrails that I have seen is that they are 1 part of a "binary" or "Trinary" "weapon" - the other being vaccines or fluoride or any other conspiracy du jour you can think up.

so only if you have both or all 3 parts you get the effects.

Then TPTB don't get wiped out by NOT taking the 2nd/3rd parts.

Don't blame me for this - I'm just reporting the story!!


Hi, I notice that you have sent the links to this information via U2U to another member.

Care to share with the whole family?


reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 04:57 AM by waynos
reply to post by UnlimitedSky



You choosing to ignore an explanation does not equate to no explanation being offered. The reason this happens has been spelt out many times, why do you think clouds also have gaps and edges? Why can't you understand the simple stuff, like the atmosphere not being uniform and having patches where it is more or less moist than the surrounding air, but think you have a handle on some complex conspiracy?

I take it you understand the difference between persistent contrails, which require high levels of rh to allow them to persist, and short lived trails which quickly sublimate in low rh air. Common to both types is that it is freezing cold up there too. All you need is a patch or band of drier or warmer air crossing the path the plane is flying on and you will have a section of the trail that disappears immediately, while the rest of it remains. The opposite also happens where a plane not leaving a lasting trail crosses a colder, more saturated, patch and a very short persistent trail is left.

You have a cheek to ask for people to be respectful to you when you called people with an opposing viewpoint to yours "trolls" in your preceding post. Respect cuts both ways, you know?
edit on 28-10-2012 by waynos because: added short explanation



reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 10:04 AM by UnlimitedSky
reply to post by waynos



When I referred to trolls I meant people who come onto a thread specifically to derail it.

The only reason why I have not replied yet is because I have been off line, living a ife outside of the rectangular electronic stage through which we communicate through the ehter. Did you check if I was online before accusing me of ignoring the previous poster's exlanation?

To the poster who sent his explanation: Thank you for that. I don't believe that it is variations of a kind which causes these dashes. It is certainly a free forum and I would like to agree to disagree.


reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 10:34 AM by waynos
reply to post by UnlimitedSky



Why would I check this? I'm not nearly so facile as to think anything like that. I wasn't talking about the other reply posted on this thread. I was talking about the countless other times the same explanation was posted whenever pictures of trails with gaps appear on this forum over the past year or more, as illustrated by the fact I said that an explanation had been posted 'many times' which you failed to comprehend. Note, you didn't post asking for an explanation, as if you merely hadn't seen one, you asserted, wrongly, that it couldn't be explained.

No need to thank me for my explanation (posted before I read the other reply) I had a feeling you would choose to ignore that too anyway, but I chose to be courteous enough to respond.

You are welcome.
edit on 28-10-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-10-2012 @ 12:28 PM by Uncinus
Originally posted by UnlimitedSky
reply to
post by alfa1



To me it looks like a totally different thing. One lot is a clear broken line, the others have started breaking up but is still clearly continues without any clear blue sky interruptions.

Please explain to me specifically how you think these 'on/off' lines are naturally formed if they were contrails? To me it is most clear that this is a matter of the spray running out.


Sometimes you get a solid cloud layer with a few breaks, sometimes you get small individual clouds. Same thing here except you can't see it until the plane flies through it.


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



NOAA Doc Strong Evidence They Are and Have Been Spraying Us
  Posted 15 days ago with 36 member flags
Chemtrail Programs Only Cost Us $5 Billion a Year
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
How do elites escape chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
ChemTrails over Michigan
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Geo-engineering (Chemtrails) and Bible Prophecy
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags