Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

New Quantum Theory Discovered "GODDESS WAVE" could prove existance of GOD/GODDESS/ONE

page: 4
26
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   
reply to post by ErgoTheConclusion
 


Ergo what a very beautiful and insightful reply, i very much enjoyed reading that.

O.P I can sort of see where you are shining your light, but, will you please provide something substantive that is capable of getting the message through to dullards such as myself, please.




posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 12:21 PM
link   
reply to post by The X
 


I've already sent a message to the OP asking for layman's terms on this theory. He's offline rightnow, so I can only hope that when I get back on later, there'll be a reply.

No one's getting anything more from him right now, I guess.



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 12:46 PM
link   
Atleast its not in the science forum.



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 12:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by The X
reply to post by ErgoTheConclusion
 


Ergo what a very beautiful and insightful reply, i very much enjoyed reading that.

O.P I can sort of see where you are shining your light, but, will you please provide something substantive that is capable of getting the message through to dullards such as myself, please.



Laymen terms is all he can tell you. His little diagram of a wave photon packet can only be explained in laymens because in science its pointless.

For a thorough debunking of his entire intellectual process. See here...www.abovetopsecret.com...

This explains alot...

Originally posted by primalfractal

Memes are more powerful than books on quantum......

......Hey, I think I might have found the "Goddess Wave".


Please, please please, dont let yourself become corrupted with this pseudononsense.
If anyone has any doubts I am willing to take the time and explain why EVERYTHING this guy has to say is not founded on any truth. Well not everything, theres too much nonsense. I am willing to debunk ANYTHING he has said. So someone pick one of his main points and I will explain why its a fairy tale.

He keeps mentioning math, Ill give him some math.
edit on 12-10-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)
edit on 12-10-2012 by ubeenhad because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 01:40 PM
link   
I'm confused.

All I see is a bunch of pictures, quotes and exclamation marks...

What is the actual "new quantum theory" that could prove the existance of God?

Why is he not explaining anything?



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 01:46 PM
link   
Changing direction of the particle emitter does not curve a photon packet

What you are doing is creating a photon shift
home.earthlink.net...

Speaking of the Physicsforum Silas answers this very clearly, reminds me of the laws of motion and Galileo's thought experiment to prove the Earth was moving helped Einstien with general relativity. All you have done is confuse people, so I am not sure what you are doing...LOL
www.physicsforums.com...
edit on 12-10-2012 by abeverage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 01:46 PM
link   
reply to post by primalfractal
 


I am totally down with you Bro. Let's surf this tasty wave all the way to Omega bay!



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 01:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vandettas
I'm confused.

All I see is a bunch of pictures, quotes and exclamation marks...

What is the actual "new quantum theory" that could prove the existance of God?

Why is he not explaining anything?



I am secretly hoping that he is away formulating a magnificent and insightful post about his new theory, then we can all look over it and give our humble opinions. come on OP we are waiting



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 01:54 PM
link   
Oh and the best answer of the two in the Physicsforum was "Photons are emitted or not emitted, but not "50% out of something"

Either a state of on or a state of off there is no in between. There have been many experiments on moving either the emitter or moving the target as I have posted above.

But you are not understanding the very basic point, that this is a null or not possible experiment which both answered you politely about.

edit on 12-10-2012 by abeverage because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 01:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by ubeenhad
Atleast its not in the science forum.


star for both your posts and avatar :p

waiting with ya



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 02:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Mary Rose
But what is the link for



Originally posted by primalfractal
I cant find it but it was from a free picture site.
It is a Walter Russel pic though.


This image, entitled “The Octave Wave,” from a Walter Russell website, is similar:




posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 02:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by primalfractal
Good news!

You are the dreamers, the bright ones, this is especially for you!,

NEW REALITY

Which means we could scientifically prove the existence of God/Goddess/One, the Trinity.


Once we see photos of life on other planets and aliens present themselves in physical form to our world, religion and god beliefs will all be thrown out the window and the truth on how our human existence will shatter future theories on gods.

Have fun with your math and dreams on this subject




posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 02:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by ecapsretuo
What the heck is going on here


Apparently we have someone who said he could prove the existence of God, but calls the rest of the trinity Goddess and One. He has some sort of theory, wants to run a test. A little vague on how he's making that happen.

So far all I can make out of this is that he's good at replying to himself. I've never seen so many replies made by the person who created the original post - especially when he's not responding to anyone in particular.

I wanted to try and wrap my head around this but I don't see how a math equation proves the existence of one all knowing being. That's like saying I can prove 3+4=7, that means there is a God......No, all that means is that if you have three objects and you add four more, you do indeed have 7 objects.



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 02:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by ErgoTheConclusion
reply to post by subject x
 

And many theories were "incorrect" at first, but were pointing in the right direction.


Yes -- But many incorrect theories were pointing in the wrong direction, too.

Until the OP actually gives us some specific math to look at (or the connection between his ideas and divinity), there can be no discussion as to whether his hypotheses are right or wrong.



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by primalfractal
. . .You have to have the maths for a real quantum theory. And there is an experiment designed to make it a tested Law Of Physics. . . . Some of the brave professional Quantum physicists here on ATS already support and are helping with the theory, and experiment design. . . . With the help of professional Quantum physicists I have designed an experiment to test my theory and put it to TPTB. . . . I do and I have an experiment designed to test it. . . . So I need you to MAKE SOME NOISE ats.


How will the experiment get done?



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 03:10 PM
link   
The term "God Particle" is a misnomer made up by a publisher, not Higgs. It has nothing to do with reconciling science and superstition.

More here: jamestabor.com...

Anyhow, to be honest, "your theory" (seen this exact type of stuff a hundred times at least) actually points to the ancestor simulation theory much more than an esoteric version of reality.

Our reality as a computer progra, ergo, no religious afterlife.

No reconciling with religion whatsoever.

None.



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by primalfractal
 


Thank you for you post, very inspiring yet also incomprehensible for me in some places....

What I gather is it is all connected via sacred geometry....Male, Female, positive, negative, yin and yang...



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by primalfractal
 


I am also unable to disprove your theory, despite my background in astrophysics.

Please be aware, however, that I am also totally unable to disprove Gene Ray's Time Cube theory. This is not because it is a legitimate theory and does not validate it.

How is your "new quantum theory" related in any way to the quantum world? A quantum is a discrete amount and is far more applicable to particle descriptions of light rather than wave descriptions.

Please provide the mathematical basis for your theory as the English language descriptions and pretty pictures are not as specific and are open to misinterpretation.

You also seem to be making great leaps in the implications of your theory that appear totally groundless to me.

Until you can provide actual support for your theory, I'll just classify you as just another Internet kook like Gene Ray.


edit on 12/10/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 04:35 PM
link   
reply to post by chr0naut
 



I am also unable to disprove your theory, despite my background in astrophysics.


What theory???


He hasn't posted the promised mathematical formula, and he hasn't posted anything of his theory except exhilaration at having thought of it... so what are you unable to disprove, exactly?



posted on Oct, 12 2012 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by chr0naut
 



I am also unable to disprove your theory, despite my background in astrophysics.


What theory???


He hasn't posted the promised mathematical formula, and he hasn't posted anything of his theory except exhilaration at having thought of it... so what are you unable to disprove, exactly?


But the "Peons Eliciting Quantum Subfluctuation in Phantom Phase-Space" theory PROVES that God has a bad golfing average on Thursday!!!!!




edit on 12/10/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join