It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sweetooth
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by sweetooth
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by sweetooth
So you don't believe in DNA parental tests, then?
you mean HUMAN DNA parental tests? there has never been a parental test that came out with someone having a monkey for a father has there? any confusion john?
DNA is DNA. Do you even know what DNA is? Explain to us why a paternity test only works on "human DNA" and not other lifeforms.edit on 12-10-2012 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)
because they don't wanna appear on the ricki lake show fool!
and also because we are DIFFERENT. H-U-M-A-N
The Miller and Urey experiment[1] (or Urey–Miller experiment)[2] was an experiment that simulated the conditions thought at the time to be present on the early Earth, and tested for the occurrence of chemical origins of life.
Specifically, the experiment tested Alexander Oparin's and J. B. S. Haldane's hypothesis that conditions on the primitive Earth favored chemical reactions that synthesized organic compounds from inorganic precursors.
Considered to be the classic experiment on the origin of life, it was conducted in 1952[3] and published in 1953 by Stanley Miller and Harold Urey at the University of Chicago.[4][5][6]
After Miller's death in 2007, scientists examining sealed vials preserved from the original experiments were able to show that there were actually well over 20 different amino acids produced in Miller's original experiments. That is considerably more than what Miller originally reported, and more than the 20 that naturally occur in life.[7]
Moreover, some evidence suggests that Earth's original atmosphere might have had a different composition from the gas used in the Miller–Urey experiment. There is abundant evidence of major volcanic eruptions 4 billion years ago, which would have released carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen (N2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere. Experiments using these gases in addition to the ones in the original Miller–Urey experiment have produced more diverse molecules.[8]
Originally posted by SpearMint
reply to post by sweetooth
But we aren't entirely different.
Originally posted by sweetooth
Originally posted by SpearMint
reply to post by sweetooth
But we aren't entirely different.
true. like every living species of mammal on the planet we share the same 'qualities'. eyes mouth nose toes legs 'hand/paws/claws' etc. that is why DNA is so similar across the board.
But their whole argument is based on a lack of understanding.
All observations have shown that life comes only from life. There is no way, according to observations and this accepted law, that life can come from nonliving matter using a natural process. One either believes that life (mysteriously) came to and evolution began, or life was created and evolution began from that point.