It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Oxford English Dictionary says that scientific method is: "a method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses
Originally posted by Mandrakerealmz
reply to post by ubeenhad
Something that I always thought was funny and a very simple way to show our science is wrong in many ways is the corona of the sun. Its temperature violates thermodynamics. Science says it should be colder. Yet its one of the hottest parts.
Isn't it good that science is wrong though? Shows that we have more to discover . However when people refuse to accept the science that they are heavily invested in is wrong it just holds back our species
Originally posted by shadowreborn89
why convince if you cant see with your own eyes, or only see what you want with your own eyes, how can anyone convince you?
Originally posted by Sublimecraft
Originally posted by 1beerplease
Originally posted by randomname
you could probably apply the scientific method to the holocaust and end up sounding like mahmoud ahmadinejad.
you can't discount eyewitness testimony, especially when you have thousands saying they witnessed the same event.
like wise, if it doesn't fit your hypothesis you can't chime in and write it all off by citing non-existent and implausible explanations like "mass hysteria" or swamp gas.
so to me, mass eyewitnesses to an event like ufo's or the miracle of the sun at fatima, are just as reliable as fact as anything proven by the scientific method.
to discount ufo's because it didn't leave a microscopic piece of metal behind to analyse is like claiming cars don't exist because there isn't a spark plug on your drive way.
even though you've seen one, owned one and billions of people can testify to their existence.
Originally posted by r2d246
What's forbidden archeology anyway?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by r2d246
What's forbidden archeology anyway?
Figuring out how the first civilizations had written down things that are dismissed as Myths. If they were the oldest and first where did they inherit them from...?
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by r2d246
What's forbidden archeology anyway?
Figuring out how the first civilizations had written down things that are dismissed as Myths. If they were the oldest and first where did they inherit them from...?
Well that would probably be more like secret history. I would define 'forbidden archeology' as the research of ancient structures, artwork and other objects which represent an apparent problem for the mainstream interpretation. Like ancient Christian artwork which shows UFO's, aliens and even abductions. Or huge granite stone structures which we can't even replicate with modern machinery today. Mysterious objects like the crystal skulls or the golden jets. Tangible things.edit on 11/10/2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)