It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dayve
reply to post by PaperbackWriter
Wellllllll.... that is odd indeed.... Do you know what page the article is on when she was found, or do you have the link..?
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
Now I ask you Dayve, when was the last time the media was allowed to release photos of a purported stretcherful of a child's body parts? We presume she's all there though, right?
When was the last time the cops released likewise such a photo?
I have been known to follow a missing person's case or 10. Never seen such before myself.
What is the vantage point, you reckon? A low flying helicopter on zoom or what?
Originally posted by Hr2burn
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
Now I ask you Dayve, when was the last time the media was allowed to release photos of a purported stretcherful of a child's body parts? We presume she's all there though, right?
When was the last time the cops released likewise such a photo?
I have been known to follow a missing person's case or 10. Never seen such before myself.
What is the vantage point, you reckon? A low flying helicopter on zoom or what?
No, they reported that they found some body parts in his (mom's) house...
Austin Sigg is his name, his dad is semi famous (and a piece of work) and appear to be very well off.edit on 24-10-2012 by Hr2burn because: More info
Senior investigative reporter Josh Bernstein confirmed that the teenager had been treated for an addiction to pornography. Bernstein reports family members say he was just 15 years old and his addiction was so strong that it required counseling.
It's an odd case.
Here's his "mug shot" put through fotoforensics:
fotoforensics.com...
His eyes, the hair both head and facial, and the string and skin to the left are tampered with.
Earlier in the thread I commented about the location of her "body". Not sure about that because the news showed a stretcher from an areial photo of the truck both during and after when it is gone.
There is no crime scene tape. There are no LE anywhere in the area securing the scene. Nor taking any evidence. No evidence that a dismembered body was JUST removed from the location.
The bag placed in the subdivision was another oddity in itself. Why would anyone place her backpack with her clothes inside a paperbag? If you think to taunt police, you've been watching too much crime drama on TV.
There is no way this could be done without some DNA, hair or fibers being left.
If that were the case then it wouldn't be his Mom calling the cops on him and him turning himself in.
They would have already picked him up.
I think the case links to the fake Aurora psy-op case somehow.
These people are listed as residents of Aurora in their bios.
Even the area where she was allegedly left (dismembered?), is too high profile an area to have escaped notice for the length of time she was missing.
Not sure what is going on, but it has some very odd peculiarities to this story.
Whenever a mugshot is doctored, I get a little suspicious. I'm just funny that way, I guess.
Originally posted by Juggernog
It's an odd case.
Here's his "mug shot" put through fotoforensics:
fotoforensics.com...
His eyes, the hair both head and facial, and the string and skin to the left are tampered with.
Earlier in the thread I commented about the location of her "body". Not sure about that because the news showed a stretcher from an areial photo of the truck both during and after when it is gone.
There is no crime scene tape. There are no LE anywhere in the area securing the scene. Nor taking any evidence. No evidence that a dismembered body was JUST removed from the location.
The bag placed in the subdivision was another oddity in itself. Why would anyone place her backpack with her clothes inside a paperbag? If you think to taunt police, you've been watching too much crime drama on TV.
There is no way this could be done without some DNA, hair or fibers being left.
If that were the case then it wouldn't be his Mom calling the cops on him and him turning himself in.
They would have already picked him up.
I think the case links to the fake Aurora psy-op case somehow.
These people are listed as residents of Aurora in their bios.
Even the area where she was allegedly left (dismembered?), is too high profile an area to have escaped notice for the length of time she was missing.
Not sure what is going on, but it has some very odd peculiarities to this story.
Whenever a mugshot is doctored, I get a little suspicious. I'm just funny that way, I guess.
Jesus Christ, not everything is a conspiracy.
Dont turn a thread about a poor little girl getting butchered into some stupid conspiracy theory just because she lived in the same state where someone shot people at a theater.
stupidedit on 10/25/2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)edit on 10/25/2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
Now I ask you Dayve, when was the last time the media was allowed to release photos of a purported stretcherful of a child's body parts? We presume she's all there though, right?
When was the last time the cops released likewise such a photo?
I have been known to follow a missing person's case or 10. Never seen such before myself.
What is the vantage point, you reckon? A low flying helicopter on zoom or what?
Originally posted by dayve
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
Now I ask you Dayve, when was the last time the media was allowed to release photos of a purported stretcherful of a child's body parts? We presume she's all there though, right?
When was the last time the cops released likewise such a photo?
I have been known to follow a missing person's case or 10. Never seen such before myself.
What is the vantage point, you reckon? A low flying helicopter on zoom or what?
What are you implying..? That it's not her body..? Because that does happen...
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
Compare above "Jessica" to this pic:
fotoforensics.com...
Taken in 2006? What, so she's supposedly 4 here?
Obviously the date is added. Unrealistically so, but added.