Hmmmm....Wasn't that about the time that Columbus was here. Are they sure that these weren't something to do with the mass killings the Spanish did
at around that time?

A wicker man was a large wicker statue of a human used by the ancient Druids (priests of Celtic paganism) for human sacrifice by burning it in effigy, according to Julius Caesar in his Commentarii de Bello Gallico (Commentary on the Gallic War).
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by SLAYER69
Thanks for addressing that very point. To say the Aztec were savage and the Spaniards not is conveniently overlooking the millions slaughtered by Spain in the name of God and King.
As far as I'm concerned the Aztecs had a far more advanced civilization than Europe at the time. It was only their lack of metalworking skills that would doom them to Spanish conquest.
The burning of every manuscript by the friars (pun intended) was an act of ignorance on par with the burning of the library of Alexandria.
The Spanish only did a favor for themselves in destroying the Aztec empire and was mainly due to Cortez' insatiable lust for glory and riches.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by ollncasino
So much for the claims by descendants that the Aztecs weren't doing human sacrifice. The thing I find so odd is these people had no dental health care and yet just look at those teeth 500 years later. Unbelievable.
S+F for this one OPedit on 10-10-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by ollncasino
You know, there was human sacrifice in the old world too...
Source
A wicker man was a large wicker statue of a human used by the ancient Druids (priests of Celtic paganism) for human sacrifice by burning it in effigy, according to Julius Caesar in his Commentarii de Bello Gallico (Commentary on the Gallic War).