It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by RealSpoke
Ah I hate dealing with cops I don't know if I could handle that. It's a sort of terrorism you know? I mean there are bound to be people out there that have been made paranoid by this or avoid going to certain places or going out at all if they are targeted regularly. I considered moving to Pittsburgh.. know if they have it there?
I don't know a thing about who this kid is or what his background may be. Stop and Frisk is one thing, but it's that personal touch and attention he gets too. It would appear, very personal and individual. Now the kid sure as heck isn't going to tell anyone if he's sitting as a suspect on..say a sex offense, or a killing. Who knows?
. Individual attention can be just as simple as, he got off or they can't get him on something they figure he absolutely did do and it's got them pissed enough to try and bait him into doing something stupid.
(One other point which may matter and I'm not seeing anyone mention.... I heard the term Mutt used a lot growing up around cops. It's interchangeable with suspect, perp, con, etc etc etc...just for context and not necessarily any slur beyond that..)
Originally posted by Monger
Too many cops in this world.
Originally posted by HandyDandy
reply to post by Realtruth
So, since cops have a hard job, that gives them the priviledge to stomp on constitutional rights guaranteed by the US Constitution?
Wish I could violate laws to make my job easier too.
edit on 11-10-2012 by HandyDandy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Realtruth
It's obvious you are twisting and adding words here to create drama. No where in my post did I state that police should be able to violate laws, or "stomp on constitutional rights".
Originally posted by Realtruth
So I guess the cusp of the matter is we are damned if the police are present and damned if they are not there.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Um, it's a violation of the 4rth amendment. Why are you defending this? They stop random people then frisk them for no reason. That is the policy. 9/10 of these people are always innocent, according to the NYPD statistics.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
Originally posted by RealSpoke
But there there are always those people, always republicans, that try to make blatantly racist things, somehow not racist. It's really pathetic.edit on 11-10-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)
When are you people... yes, you heard me right. YOU PEOPLE. When are you people going to take responsibility for yourselves and stop entering into contract with those whose job it is to punish you for entering into contract with them?
Originally posted by rival
This is absolutely outrageous!
I'm mad as hell right now. Stop and frisk?! IN AMERICA........AS ROUTINE POLICY?!
I've never heard of this until now. How could this stand up to constitutional scrutiny!?
Amendment IV
Blah blah blah blah. Distraction empty promise blah.
This needs to be challenged NOW! People....ALL PEOPLE....need to get angry and get active.
I...I... can't understand this....Nazi Germany was within the last century. AMERICANS fought and died
to stop evil power systems like this.......and we just take it as a normal day-to-day routine?
I can't believe I've never even heard about this till now....nobody's even speaking out...