It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The net result is that the easily identified final fluffy smooth tampering applications tried but failed to completely hide the large dark blocks extending over the strip edges. It may give the impression that careless image tampering didn't quite hide civilization evidence in these spots. However, if any civilization evidence was ever at these locations, it was thoroughly hidden by the original grainy textured tampering which layers are so dense that nothing can be seen of even fairly large terrain features and the only things that can be seen are very large features like mountains, hills, impact craters, canyons, and finally the dark compression blocks.
In retrospect, as long as the secrecy agenda is inclined to deal with the cumbersome task of attempting to hide the truth they don't want us to know about via modifying and manipulating the original science data imaging on a massive scale, mistakes will be made just because of the sheer numbers and scale involved and small bits and pieces of truth may find its way through to us. However, when they convert over (and they will) to just making up and designing computer graphics generated terrain from scratch no longer needing to modify original exploration research imaging, even greater ignorance in our world societies and institutions will prevail.
The key will be when the data released for public consumption starts demonstrating really dramatic improvements in detail and clarity. Such "improvements" will be reported as due to advancements in camera, processing, and communications technology. Worse and most sickening, it will be believed and well received by a clueless mainstream with a preference to remain that way.
Originally posted by Thunderheart
It's not all about the "black crosses", it's also what was seen on the moon that they do not want to get out, it's about the out dated special effects that they used back then that now doesn't work on modern people that may be manipulated with modern trickery.
While the image processing steps undertaken as part of this effort may have removed some of these blemish features, users should be aware that blemish features exist in many of the images.
Originally posted by SolidGoal
Call me an old-fashioned nostalgic, but I actually like those crosses or reseau marks on the moon pictures.
Also, for all you moon hoaxers :
Do you really think NASA would put undergrad students "in the know" ?
Think of it.
ASU students and staff have developed software, provided archiving expertise, and processed scans to final products
Johnson Space Center Team do the bulk of the work applying their years of experience and quality control ...
These images, and their associated derived products, may not be copied, reverse engineered, decompiled, disassembled, translated, modified or have derivative works made of the imagery, in whole or in part.
NASA has stated all these years that the Apollo images belong to the public but this agreement between NASA/ASU specifically says that derivative works are prohibited. Apollo space images are now copyrighted.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
NASA has stated all these years that the Apollo images belong to the public but this agreement between NASA/ASU specifically says that derivative works are prohibited. Apollo space images are now copyrighted.
Only the ones that have had the reseau marks removed. You can still use the originals in your research.
That's not a good enough excuse, DJ. NASA should not be engaging in propaganda by removing the reseau patterns from Apollo images. NASA should not be putting copyright restrictions on Apollo images.... EVER!!
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
That's not a good enough excuse, DJ. NASA should not be engaging in propaganda by removing the reseau patterns from Apollo images. NASA should not be putting copyright restrictions on Apollo images.... EVER!!
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Shout out to lokomotiv23's thread titled Hasselblads On The Moon, which got me interested in the subject of lunar Hasselblads. There are at least 12 lunar Hasselblads that were dumped on the surface of the moon. These cameras are the key to unlocking the Apollo conspiracy.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
According to some sources, the lunar Hasselblads were dumped on the moon because of weight considerations. This has shown to be not true.
Although the lunar Hasselblads weighed only 4 pounds each Astronaut Ed Mitchell smuggled his Mauer 16-mm DAC which weighed 2 pounds on Apollo 14. In 2011 he attempted to auction that lunar camera but NASA swooped down with legal attacks.
NASA dumped the cameras on the moon for a reason: The lunar landings were faked.
NASA is removing the reseau marks from Apollo mages for the same reason.
Nasa dumped the cameras on the moon, because the moonlandings were faked? Maybe you should think about what you wrote.
NASA has stipulated that the lunar Hasselblads were left on the surface of the moon. The Apollo defenders in this thread have not ever disputed it. Some Apollo defenders here have described the lunar Hasselblad as a "useless weight" or "empty camera housings".
Next fact. The lunar Hasselblad cameras all included a unique reseau pattern glass plate and a unique Biogon lens.
Next fact. Arizona State University, in a legal contract with NASA, has agreed to digitally remove the reseau pattern markings from the ultra hi-res 1.9GB scan files.
My personal interpretation of these facts leads me to the conclusion that NASA does not want us to see what secrets can be found within the lunar Hasselblad negatives.
NASA is behaving in a very suspicious manner and they are engaging in open acts of historical revisionism.
So, my statement does not break logic.
The moon landings were faked,
NASA has been covering up for this last 40+ years. First, NASA needed a logical reason to leave the cameras on the moon.
Second, they have a university remove the reseau patterns from all the images.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
NASA has stated all these years that the Apollo images belong to the public but this agreement between NASA/ASU specifically says that derivative works are prohibited. Apollo space images are now copyrighted
Raw scans should be credited using the line "NASA/JSC/Arizona State University" or "NASA/JSC/ASU". Arizona State University retains the rights to any derived products (such as post-scanning processed digital images and movies), in part and in whole. ASU hereby grants permission for news media, educators, personal, and scientific users to download and use individual ASU-produced Apollo images and their complete associated captions if applicable for personal, educational, and research uses without express permission.
These images, and their associated derived products, may not be copied, reverse engineered, decompiled, disassembled, translated, modified or have derivative works made of the imagery, in whole or in part. You also may not rent, disclose, publish, sell, assign, lease, sub-license, market, or transfer the imagery or any part thereof or use it in any manner not expressly authorized.