White House Comes Clean: No Protest Outside Libya Consulate, page 20


Pages: <<  17    18    19    20    21    22  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 74 times


reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 05:56 PM by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by xuenchen



Oh LOL

GOP responsible for cutting State Department Security overseas - including the Benghazi, Libya, consulate,

Source

Wah Wah Wah, everyone here is gonna need a stiff drink tonight. Now about you guys are WANTING me to go back off topic "eh, he Gogo, what were you saying about how progressive I was for supporting a non Christian for president?"


reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 06:03 PM by xuenchen
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to
post by xuenchen



Oh LOL

GOP responsible for cutting State Department Security overseas - including the Benghazi, Libya, consulate,

Source

Wah Wah Wah, everyone here is gonna need a stiff drink tonight. Now about you guys are WANTING me to go back off topic "eh, he Gogo, what were you saying about how progressive I was for supporting a non Christian for president?"


Gee.

I wonder why the White House didn't say that last month ?

Did any of that come up in the hearings yesterday ?


ADD: And still no excuse for the lying and apparent cover ups.
It's more like a simple "misappropriation of assets"
edit on Oct-11-2012 by xuenchen because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 06:17 PM by loki41872
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow




In response, i offer this:

State Department spent $108,000 making the Embassy in Vienna "Green"


The State Department had plenty of money. They just chose to spend it on things like this, instead of security. I would cut their budget, too.



reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 06:28 PM by xuenchen
Originally posted by loki41872
reply to
post by GogoVicMorrow




In response, i offer this:

State Department spent $108,000 making the Embassy in Vienna "Green"


The State Department had plenty of money. They just chose to spend it on things like this, instead of security. I would cut their budget, too.



This article has another disturbing fact....

The American embassy in Austria is considered one of the safest diplomatic postings in the world. The American mission in Benghazi, Libya is considered one of the most dangerous.

While the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton within the last eighteen months specifically prohibits the stationing of Marines at any diplomatic station in that country,

the American embassy in Austria has a full complement of Marines. Among their duties are the presenting of the American flag at the annual 4th of July picnic held at the embassy in Vienna every year.

source



reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 07:16 PM by Swills
reply to post by smithologist54



Yeah, this reminds me of 9/11/2001 because if we are to believe the official story then 9/11 was a result of all the failures you listed above. Surprise surprise it happened again 10 years later.


reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 07:32 PM by BlueAjah
Rep. Chaffetz says, “When you’re in Libya, after a revolution… you [have to] prioritize things. And what clearly didn’t happen is Libya was not a priority. I believe what I heard is that it’s because they wanted the appearance of normalization. That’s what they wanted. And that fit with Obama narrative moving forward.”


cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com...

This explanation makes more sense than the budget excuse.

It seems like the current administration has tried to change the reputation of the US from a strong force to a cooperative, non-threatening entity. So, this explanation from Re. Chaffetz does fit. Cooperation with other countries can be a good thing, but not at the expense of the safety of our citizens.

They were probably attempting to not appear as occupying force, and rather as just another embassy doing mundane business.


reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 08:43 PM by xuenchen
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to
post by xuenchen



Oh LOL

GOP responsible for cutting State Department Security overseas - including the Benghazi, Libya, consulate,

Source

Wah Wah Wah, everyone here is gonna need a stiff drink tonight. Now about you guys are WANTING me to go back off topic "eh, he Gogo, what were you saying about how progressive I was for supporting a non Christian for president?"


The VP debate flushed out some info:

9:29 p.m. EDT

The GOP rapid response team replies to Biden's claim that Ryan would have cut funding for embassy security by citing State Department testimony that budgetary constraints had nothing to do with the security deployments in Benghazi. As Ryan said, it was the specific denial of requests for more security personnel that were the problem. Both could also have added that Obama's sequester proposal calls for embassy security cuts.

LIVE Fact Check: The Joe Biden Lie Detector



from Congressional hearings:
YouTube
At a Congressional Hearing, State Department: Budget Had Nothing To Do With Security Decisions At Benghazi (10/10/12)

"State Department: Budget Had Nothing To Do With Security Decisions At Benghazi"

One "Left" hand still doesn't know what the other "Left" hand is doing


reply posted on 11-10-2012 @ 09:36 PM by xuenchen
More of the same......

They don't get it !!

Biden contradicts State Department on Benghazi security

Vice President Joe Biden claimed that the administration wasn't aware of requests for more security in Libya before the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi during Thursday night's debate, contradicting three State Department officials and the former head of diplomatic security in Libya.

"We weren't told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security there," Biden said.

In fact, two security officials who worked for the State Department in Libya at the time testified Thursday that they repeatedly requested more security and two State Department officials admitted they had denied those requests.

"All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources," the top regional security officer in Libya over the summer, Eric Nordstrom, testified. "In those conversations, I was specifically told [by Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Charlene Lamb] ‘You cannot request an SST extension.' I determined I was told that because there would be too much political cost. We went ahead and requested it anyway. ......


pdf copies
House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) released the unclassified cables containing those requests.



reply posted on 12-10-2012 @ 03:48 AM by Bluemoonsine
I dunno know.

I think I know.

Who knows?

Rewind; press play; then pray it don't play.

edit on 12-10-2012 by Bluemoonsine because: (no reason given)




reply posted on 12-10-2012 @ 01:28 PM by IAMTAT
reply to post by xuenchen



Here it is folks:
MSNBC Just called Biden a liar about his not knowing of Libyan consulate security request!

www.youtube.com...


reply posted on 12-10-2012 @ 01:50 PM by xuenchen
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to
post by xuenchen



Here it is folks:
MSNBC Just called Biden a liar about his not knowing of Libyan consulate security request!

www.youtube.com...



Andrea Mitchell of ALL the people

I bet she had to take double medication to get that report out of her loud mouth !!!
(did she hate every second ?)

Watch her expression in the video !!

Somethings up -- is the Liberal M$M is folding on Obama & Co. ?


The biggest lie Vice President Joe Biden told tonight was a whopper. And somehow it like got past moderator Martha Raddatz, who we were told knows everything about foreign policy. Biden made the patently false and outrageous claim that no one in the Obama administration knew that requests for extra security had been made by our Libyan ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and other members of our consulate in Benghazi.

To emphasize his lie, Biden actually said it twice.

The claim is absolutely false. So false in fact, that his pals at MSNBC called him out on it:

"NBC Fact Check: Biden Contradicted State Department On Benghazi Security"

White House Serial Lies About Libya Extend to VP Debate



edit on Oct-12-2012 by xuenchen because:



reply posted on 13-10-2012 @ 04:18 AM by xuenchen
The Columbus Dispatch newspaper has a good summary of events.

Even though the mainstream media's Narrative Gatekeepers won't allow for a national discussion on the security failures in Libya and the subsequent White House cover up, that doesn’t mean voters are disinterested or that local media outlets in the individual states aren't covering the September 11 anniversary attacks. This morning, the Columbus Dispatch out of the crucial swing state of Ohio, published a brutal (because it's true) editorial lashing out at Obama's dishonest and incompetent mishandling of Libya:......................

Devastating Ohio Editorial: Obama's Handling of Libya Indefensible



The article:
Testimony in a congressional hearing Wednesday on the Sept. 11 outrage against the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi fueled a growing suspicion: President Barack Obama’s administration was more concerned about projecting the image of improving stability in Libya, to bolster his re-election chances, than it was about ensuring the security of Americans on the ground there.

The fact of a successful terrorist attack against the U.S. on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks — a day, above all others, when security for American officials in volatile countries should be at its utmost — is demoralizing and infuriating.

After months of concern by diplomats in Libya about the country’s deteriorating security, Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three embassy employees were murdered by heavily armed and organized terrorists. The possibility the government could have prevented their deaths by responding to their pleas for greater security is devastating........

Preventable tragedy -
Obama administration can’t spin its way out of blame for Benghazi


Pages: <<  17    18    19    20    21    22  >>    ^^TOP^^