It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by xuenchen
Why the lies? Why the lies from the State Department, Susan Rice, the White House?
Did they think that they could cover for the terrorists?
I don't understand.
What I do know is that this is huge. A cover-up attempt by our government to avoid contreversy about an attack where 4 died.
Insane.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Destinyone
I'm surprised he hasn't blamed Bush or the GOP yet!
Originally posted by OutonaLimb
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by xuenchen
Why the lies? Why the lies from the State Department, Susan Rice, the White House?
Did they think that they could cover for the terrorists?
I don't understand.
What I do know is that this is huge. A cover-up attempt by our government to avoid contreversy about an attack where 4 died.
Insane.
Did 4 die? Did anyone actually die?
Be careful what you believe.
America is being primed for revolution from within. The 'government' are
setting themselves up for a huge fall. (see 9/11 and all the only too obvious
incriminating evidence).
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
I do not like Romney.
I do not like Obama.
I was raised in a predominatley Mormon community, but was raised Presbytarian. I am now a mixture of athiest/agnostic.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
I have studied and read The Book of Mormon as well as the Bible. I have had many talks with my former neighbors, class mates and LDS friends.
GoGoVicMorrow is 100% correct in his ascertation that Mormons are not Christians. He has even presented SOURCE material (quotes from the Book of Mormon/Pearl/Joe Smith himself).
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
I also agree that right-wing Xtian's are lying to themselves about Mormonism = Christianity.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
It would be like comparing diet Coke to diet Mt. Dew. Both are "sodas" but are not both "colas".
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
A better comparison would be protestants (pepsi) to catholics (coke). Mormonism is like sprite or mt. dew. Yes, it's a religion that involves christ (sugar and bubbly water) -- but it is FUNDEMENTALLY different.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
I base my opinions off of 29 years of being raised, working, going to school, reading their texts and discussing this issue with them ad naseum. If you combine that with the actual SOURCE MATERIAL already presented, GoGo's point is correct, verifyible, and defensible.
Originally posted by macman
reply to post by OneisOne
Nah...The biggest reason is that 0bama is a pacifist when it comes to foreign relations.
He would rather appease then show strength, especially towards the Muslim world.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
I base my opinions off of 29 years of being raised, working, going to school, reading their texts and discussing this issue with them ad naseum. If you combine that with the actual SOURCE MATERIAL already presented, GoGo's point is correct, verifyible, and defensible.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
reply to post by GogoVicMorrow
I do not like Romney.
I do not like Obama.
I was raised in a predominatley Mormon community, but was raised Presbytarian. I am now a mixture of athiest/agnostic.
I have studied and read The Book of Mormon as well as the Bible. I have had many talks with my former neighbors, class mates and LDS friends.
GoGoVicMorrow is 100% correct in his ascertation that Mormons are not Christians. He has even presented SOURCE material (quotes from the Book of Mormon/Pearl/Joe Smith himself).
I also agree that right-wing Xtian's are lying to themselves about Mormonism = Christianity.
It would be like comparing diet Coke to diet Mt. Dew. Both are "sodas" but are not both "colas".
A better comparison would be protestants (pepsi) to catholics (coke). Mormonism is like sprite or mt. dew. Yes, it's a religion that involves christ (sugar and bubbly water) -- but it is FUNDEMENTALLY different.
I base my opinions off of 29 years of being raised, working, going to school, reading their texts and discussing this issue with them ad naseum. If you combine that with the actual SOURCE MATERIAL already presented, GoGo's point is correct, verifyible, and defensible.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
Wait, so actual quotes from their founder, and lines of text from their own book is not considered "source" material?
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
I'm sure if I went to a Catholic church and asked them about pedo priests I wouldn't get the "truth". I'm sure they have a nice pamphlet or some brochures on the controversey for me to puruse.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
So, in your opinion, the only material that can and should be considered valid would be LDS's own public relation publications, not the actual passages from their "holy book".
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
This not only defys ignorance (and I've been on here a helluva lot longer than you and know what that axiom truly means), but it also defies logic. Yes, that thing that Mr. Spock always talks about from that televison show.
Originally posted by RealSpoke
What was the point of lying? So stupid.
Originally posted by babybunnies
Unfortunately, White House officials can only release information as it was released to them. If they were told at the time that there was a protest, then they have to go with what they know to be true.
Originally posted by babybunnies
My biggest question is this - Mitt Romney is now claiming that he knew one of the Navy SEALS that was killed in this horrific attack.
Originally posted by babybunnies
Did he get an early heads up about the attack because of his connection to this person, then jump the gun ahead of the official statement?
Originally posted by babybunnies
He's done this before, told people things he shouldn't have (like meeting with head of MI6 in London) so he has a track record.