It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Previous research has focused on mechanical explanations for the Pioneer anomaly, such as the recoil of heat from the craft's electrical generators pushing the craft backwards," Kopeikin said. "However that only explains 15 to 20 percent of the observed deceleration, whereas it is the equation for photons that explains the remaining 80-85 percent." Physicists must be careful when dealing with propagation of light in the presence of the expansion of space, noted Kopeikin, since it is affected by forces that are irrelevant in other equations. For example, the expansion of the universe affects photons, but doesn't influence the motion of planets and electrons in atoms.
Read more at: phys.org...
"The Pioneer spacecraft, two probes launched into space in the early 70s, seemed to violate the Newtonian law of gravity by decelerating anomalously as they traveled, but there was nothing in physics to explain why this happened," said Sergei Kopeikin, professor of physics and astronomy in MU's College of Arts and Science. "My study suggests that this so-called Pioneer anomaly was not anything strange. The confusion can be explained by the effect of the expansion of the universe on the movement of photons that make up light and radio waves."
Read more at: phys.org...
"Discerning the effect of the expansion of the universe on light is important to the fundamental understanding of space and time. The present study is part of a larger on-going research project that may influence the future of physics."
Read more at: phys.org...
the pioneer anomaly is basically where the spacecraft was observed to slow down, but no known reason existed that could account for the deceleration.
As a novel element of our investigation, we develop a parameterized model for the thermal recoil force and estimate the coefficients of this model independently from navigational Doppler data. We find no statistically significant difference between the two estimates and conclude that once the thermal recoil force is properly accounted for, no anomalous acceleration remains.
We investigate the possibility that the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft is due to the recoil force associated with an anisotropic emission of thermal radiation off the
vehicles.
There is no "point". Expansion occurs everywhere but at such a small scale inside the Solar system that it cannot be measured.
at what point does the expansion happen locally inside our helio sphere?
Nothing measurable.
and what effects would that have on round trip times and the nature of the signal wave/photon?
No. Thermal effects do.
does locally expanding "space" have an effect on the measured "deceleration?
Originally posted by abeverage
Be cool if it just stopped that would bend some heads...
i find the new idea...... compelling,
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by XPLodER
i find the new idea...... compelling,
Yes, of course you do.
It gives you yet another way to declare that the Universe is not the size it is. However, the idea has not be demonstrated to be valid.
The claim that the Pioneer anomaly is caused by the effects of the expansion of the Universe on the speed of light is refuted. The thermal models demonstrate what was happening on the spacecraft. The heating was the prior unknown source of acceleration. There is nothing to take into account other than the heating. It fully accounts for the acceleration. If the expansion were involved the anomaly would be greater that it is.
so your reason to refute the paper out of hand is that expansion of the universe in the local solar system is to small to effect the measurements, but the thermal models dont take this into account at all,
that someone else has already explained it to a satisfactory level?
"Previous research has focused on mechanical explanations for the Pioneer anomaly, such as the recoil of heat from the craft's electrical generators pushing the craft backwards," Kopeikin said. "However that only explains 15 to 20 percent of the observed deceleration, whereas it is the equation for photons that explains the remaining 80-85 percent."
Read more at: phys.org...
but what does this mean then?
Originally posted by XPLodER
Originally posted by abeverage
Be cool if it just stopped that would bend some heads...
you are talking about the literal meltdown of thousands of scientists minds,
arguments that go on for years lol
it would be interesting and scary at the same time
xploder