It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Allegorical
How about using the existing cards that the students ALREADY have (which have bar codes on them) and just putting a magnetic swipe on each teachers desk, every class you swipe in, problem solved.
What if I cut school and just have my friend bring my ID to school?
Idiocy in teaching - 101.
Rule number 1 - You can't teach kids that aren't present in class.
Truancy means nothing to kids today. Why would it?
Social conditioning has told kids that their parents can not tell them what to do for about half of a century now.
Guess what? It worked.
The present situation stems from the mentality that parents are not necessary and family doesn't matter any more.
Society has been reprogrammed so well that individual responsibility to anyone does not exist any more.
Parents can't control their kids. Society can't control them either.
Now the school district has to corral thousands of kids with no sense of responsibility who will get diplomas no matter what.
Yay affirmative action and NCLB. Great job at promoting failure at an early age as the norm.
It all worked so well but there's a catch. Schools aren't getting paid because the kids don't get held accountable and don't show up. So how can the schools continue to turn our kids into lazy manipulative parasites if they don't get funded?
Chip em like cattle.
A police state is the ultimate result of a progressive agenda.
Fines can cost up to $500 per truancy, due within 30 days unless a judge gives an extension. For many students and families, it’s another debt they can’t pay. And if fines aren’t paid, they can convert into an arrest warrant when a student turns 17.
In Hidalgo County, in southwest Texas, that’s exactly what happened to some 60 teenagers from poverty-level families who racked up thousands of dollars in truancy penalties. In 2010, the ACLU filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of two 18-year-old plaintiffs who’d been sent to adult detention facilities for failure to pay their fines. Francisco de Luna owed more than $11,000 in truancy fines, accumulated over five years; he was sentenced to 132 days in jail. Another student, Elizabeth Diaz, was sentenced to jail for 18 days because she couldn’t pay $1,600 in fines assessed when she was 14 years old. “Our clients were indigents. They weren’t prepared for the choice of going to jail or paying exorbitant fines,” said the ACLU’s Graybill.
Originally posted by JustSlowlyBackAway
reply to post by ninjas4321
This is just so sad.
There are other ways of keeping track of kids...one is called taking attendance in each class. There is simply no justification for forcing them to wear tracking devices like pets or criminals on house arrest.
If I were a teacher, (and I was for 25 years before I retired) I would NOT go along with this. I would stand firmly on the side of the kids who didn't wear one.
If I were a kid, or had a kid in this situation, I wouldn't wear or make my kids wear one of these, either.
Sometimes you just have to step up and say no to idiotic ideas.
edit on 9-10-2012 by JustSlowlyBackAway because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by ninjas4321
Big Brother(or sister Janet Nappytano in this case) is alive and well! Might as well condition these younguns into learning that the guvment knows best and that to fight back is futile!
Government needs to get out of the business of taking care of our children!!! Unfortunately, out of the two globalists puppets we have had chosen for our Master for the next four years, things will only get worse.....
Originally posted by riverwild
Originally posted by JustSlowlyBackAway
reply to post by ninjas4321
This is just so sad.
There are other ways of keeping track of kids...one is called taking attendance in each class. There is simply no justification for forcing them to wear tracking devices like pets or criminals on house arrest.
If I were a teacher, (and I was for 25 years before I retired) I would NOT go along with this. I would stand firmly on the side of the kids who didn't wear one.
If I were a kid, or had a kid in this situation, I wouldn't wear or make my kids wear one of these, either.
Sometimes you just have to step up and say no to idiotic ideas.
edit on 9-10-2012 by JustSlowlyBackAway because: (no reason given)
What happened to the days when they called your name and you said:
HERE
Apparently they are taking attendance in class, which is resulting in low numbers and a financial incentive to try to improve attendance (from the OP story):
Originally posted by JustSlowlyBackAway
There are other ways of keeping track of kids...one is called taking attendance in each class. There is simply no justification for forcing them to wear tracking devices like pets or criminals on house arrest.
If I were a teacher, (and I was for 25 years before I retired) I would NOT go along with this.
If the school is losing $175,000 a day, do you think they are going to keep bleeding that kind of money just because a few people whine? That's a pretty decent incentive to do something.
If successful, the tracking program could save the district as much as $175,000 lost daily to low attendance figures, which in part determine school funding. Higher attendance could lead to more state funding in the neighborhood of $1.7 million.
Originally posted by Juggernog
reply to post by ninjas4321
Man.. IF I were still in school and they tried this, I would attach that "locator" badge to a stray dog and turn it loose downtownedit on 10/9/2012 by Juggernog because: (no reason given)