Chinese telcos branded national security risk for US, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 9-10-2012 @ 11:25 AM by Maxmars

Chinese telcos branded national security risk for US


www.newscientist.com
After what is claimed to have been an 11-month national security investigation, a US government intelligence committee says that the nation's corporations should avoid buying telephone, internet or cellphone networking equipment from two Chinese telecomms companies, Huawei Technologies and ZTE Corp, both of Shenzhen.
(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
FBI Fears Chinese Hackers Have Back Door Into US Government & Military
cubist.cs.washington.edu...
www.chinatechnews.com...
it.slashdot.org.../10/24/1819200


reply posted on 9-10-2012 @ 11:25 AM by Maxmars
I would like to congratulate the ATS on being so far ahead of the curve in "reporting.

According to our political thespians, they have discovered a risk which US faces in relying on foreign telecommunications companies which use technologies and infrastructure control mechanisms that could, in theory, cause harm to us. The committee of politicians and political corporate appointees, apparently became aware of the danger sometime in late 2010 or in 2011.

ATS compiled and presented the facts in early 2008.

Speaks volumes, doesn't it?

In a report published today, the US permanent select committee on intelligence says the two firms represent a clear and present national security risk because of their alleged links with the communist government. Committee members fear that "backdoor" and monitoring facilities could be secretly present in their equipment, allowing, for instance, industrial designs to be stolen and copied before they are patented or registered as copyright.


Considering that "backdoor" firmware and hardware was already a known situation years before this news item surfaced makes me tend to think it is a political bolstering point for the political reality show....

Of course the media has a ready distraction....

A draft version of the report was quoted by Reuters as saying that Huawei and ZTE "cannot be trusted to be free of foreign state influence" and so represent a national security threat, ...


Journalism contending "Protectionism" vs. Corporate media offering a "Political expedient" distraction. Why could I think that? Well maybe because they knew in early 2008... and didn't care until the month before the elections.

Meanwhile we are left with the troubling possibility - that a statement such as ....
... Huawei and ZTE "cannot be trusted to be free of foreign state influence" and so represent a national security threat...

.... might have validity.

Now - interestingly - the article mentions something that I thought was equally noteworthy:

Indeed, aside from US-owned Cisco Systems and Juniper Networks, the telecoms switching and routing arena is a field where many large players are foreign.


It was Cisco products that were "counterfeited" which had the "backdoor" problem reported in 2008....

I think these professional political club members in the "Intelligence Committee" need to be less political and more professional....



www.newscientist.com
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 9-10-2012 @ 02:43 PM by Maxmars
reply to post by dainoyfb



The committee may have avoided any specific 'evidence' (and likely will claim it's classified) but we already know of factual and verified cases reports of such back doors being found in products from China.

The paranoid establishment may (or may not) be wrong... and it certainly bears investigation.

But I think it only matters now because they want it to become part of an "anti-China" narrative that will distinguish one candidate from another.


reply posted on 9-10-2012 @ 05:24 PM by Xcathdra
reply to post by Maxmars



One of the other main concerns is Chinese laws that govern Chinese business, regardless if those businesses are located in China or not. Chinese telcom companies are subject to Chinese govwernment control, which means a Chinese telcom company operating in a foreign country can be forced to turn over information to the Chinese government and must comply with it.

Its more than just backdoors and faulty technology....
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags