he just said to "take them out"....iran...take out iran....take out an entire country....maybe she is laughing to stifle a "are you a f'ing moronic idiot" line.

Anybody remember this quote? "We came. We saw. He died.", followed by her cackling laughter.

Actually, I don't care about Hillary's semi-haunting laugh when about to discuss the administrations policys of how far they would go.

You seem to miss out on a potential slip by the man whom said...the end of the day may be next year..it will be next year.

will be?

I don't think the Obama administration would ever overtly war with Iran when there are still some options left on the table though. People are simply tired of war. its noisy, expensive, and accomplishes little in the end.
But
I think there are very well laid out plans should that event occur..and no doubt plenty of hawks are wishing for it if only to make a cool show in a new theater.

I don't like the Iranian government. But, the western stance should be to simply support the citizens uprising...they are always on the edge of revolution, but rarely with any outside support. They can do this themselves once we back off and just give material and intelligence support.

Don't know though. what a mess.

Originally posted by SaturnFX
Actually, I don't care about Hillary's semi-haunting laugh when about to discuss the administrations policys of how far they would go.

You seem to miss out on a potential slip by the man whom said...the end of the day may be next year..it will be next year.

will be?

I don't think the Obama administration would ever overtly war with Iran when there are still some options left on the table though. People are simply tired of war. its noisy, expensive, and accomplishes little in the end.
But
I think there are very well laid out plans should that event occur..and no doubt plenty of hawks are wishing for it if only to make a cool show in a new theater.

I don't like the Iranian government. But, the western stance should be to simply support the citizens uprising...they are always on the edge of revolution, but rarely with any outside support. They can do this themselves once we back off and just give material and intelligence support.

Don't know though. what a mess.

I did pikc up on that, and it fits in perfectly with the timing. Iran conflict will be next year under Romney adminstration, but that is another thread

Originally posted by Wonderer2012

Originally posted by SaturnFX
Actually, I don't care about Hillary's semi-haunting laugh when about to discuss the administrations policys of how far they would go.

You seem to miss out on a potential slip by the man whom said...the end of the day may be next year..it will be next year.

will be?

I don't think the Obama administration would ever overtly war with Iran when there are still some options left on the table though. People are simply tired of war. its noisy, expensive, and accomplishes little in the end.
But
I think there are very well laid out plans should that event occur..and no doubt plenty of hawks are wishing for it if only to make a cool show in a new theater.

I don't like the Iranian government. But, the western stance should be to simply support the citizens uprising...they are always on the edge of revolution, but rarely with any outside support. They can do this themselves once we back off and just give material and intelligence support.

Don't know though. what a mess.

I did pikc up on that, and it fits in perfectly with the timing. Iran conflict will be next year under Romney adminstration, but that is another thread

Was watching the maddow show last night, she graphed out Romney's words in regards to military spending. What his promise is a unprecidented increase exponentially in military spending. the line spiked off the chart, far far past any height of any war combined with any other war in the history of mankind...

That is worrying...very worrying. You don't spend that much without using your toys. He has some big plans should he attain the office. PNAC of course spells this out clearly, but we pretend that doesn't exist.

Unnerving stuff.

But unless you buy into the whole all the partys are a illusion that does the bidding of the same puppetmasters, then the idea of them (Hillary and Romney) in the same fold is a bit nuts.
Hillary isn't going to be in Obama's second administration anyhow from what I understand...she is quitting last I heard after the first, going fishing or something.

I think the whole conversation is comical.

Who are we to deny nuclear power to the Iranians - or even Nuclear bombs for defense if they want them? Iran has shown they do not have a habit of being an aggressor - they are not any worse than most other aggressive countries - including the USA.

I think Iran should take Germany's lead and make Neutron bombs for defense. They could level a city of enemies and still leave most of it in tact. For power, they should develop some of this free energy or Tesla technology and they do have plenty of wind and solar. No matter how they do it, they can do it without Nuclear - but if they want Nuclear - I defend their right to have it.

My impression was that she laughed because of how candid the guy was being and it put her in an awkward position. I'm not seeing the laugh as sinister.