Well, here's my opinion.
First NASA lied to us because there were aliens in fleets flocking to earth. They had to 'wash' out images of the sky that we see in google sky,
because it proved this.
Evidence #1. Aliens Are Coming.
Then, NASA lied to us because there were structures on the moon. They had to 'photoshop' out images of the surface that show areas where the Greys
have things and stuff.
Evidence #2. Aliens Are There.
Not long after this, NASA lied to us because there are cities on Mars. They didn't do a good enough job of pixelating the houses and it looks like a 5
year old must have done it.
Evidence #3. Aliens Are There, and We Can't Work a PC.
And lets add a few random things in here and there, spice up the stew, so to speak. Like, the tether incident, the orbs that appear in uniform
patterns, add some "What if E.T. was based on a realz??" and then we leave it a few months. Apart from Zorgon.
Now, NASA lies to us because there is indeed life on Mars. It's that small we need to see a drawing of it to actually see it, and not only that, but
out of a gazillion places to land, the curiosity lands right smack bang not on a dead seafloor of decaying fishies, but where there is a single lone
dead fishy, that has awaited millions of years for a curiosity rover to appear and rumble his pad.
Evidence #4. It's Life jim, but somehow strange fish on mars that have been dead quite a long time deserves the entire conspiracy of an entire
government(s) colluding to hide this small fish, for fear it will cause panic and throw the entire human population into utter chaos, the likes we've
never seen in all of history.
Someone might even blog about it.
edit on 9-10-2012 by winofiend because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-10-2012 by winofiend because: (no reason