It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheBandit795
reply to post by chelle21689
Seems like Keith Augustine himself is being debunked.
With regards to the Pam Reynolds case (Woerlee also being debunked):
michaelprescott.typepad.com...
www.ianlawton.com...
Further links:
www.parapsychologyandtheskeptics.com...
www.victorzammit.com...
Originally posted by TheBandit795
reply to post by chelle21689
Seems like Keith Augustine himself is being debunked.
With regards to the Pam Reynolds case (Woerlee also being debunked):
michaelprescott.typepad.com...
www.ianlawton.com...
Further links:
www.parapsychologyandtheskeptics.com...
www.victorzammit.com...
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by eveshi
... and you felt the need to post this because?
Originally posted by TheBandit795
reply to post by eveshi
Looks to me like you're only out to attempt to debunk NDE threads. Right or wrong???
Originally posted by eveshi
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by eveshi
... and you felt the need to post this because?
Fair question thanks for asking.
Don't we have a responsibility to present an accurate picture of the research; a sober analysis of the anecdotal evidence; a fair representation of the information available? Are we getting that from our self appointed defenders of psi? I don't believe that we are. This forum does not reflect the world at large: what gets discussed here gets dismissed out of hand outside. Opinions stated openly here are routinely sneered at by psi-proponent columnists and parascience bloggers.
Originally posted by TheBandit795
reply to post by eveshi
So is it worth wasting time and energy debating with you if you're only out to debunk and not to discuss, then?
Believe me, if I could make myself believe in this I would but it looks like science is winning here...
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by chelle21689
Believe me, if I could make myself believe in this I would but it looks like science is winning here...
Not really, science actually confirms scripture, just 99% of people do not know what theyre looking at so they do not see the science. I never believed in that NDE stuff to begin with, so it's not going to bother me one whit. The people it will bother are people who use that as a crutch to supplement their weak faith on. I also studied the paranormal 10 years before i even became a christian and it is a fact there are a great many things science cannot explain, such as how a person can be levitated in mid air and thrown across the room like a rag doll by nothing but apparently something is there we can't see, often times they growl, or be scratched by things we cannot even see while people watch and video it happening on the spot. Naturally people try to rationalize the irrational, lie to themselves that certain things do not exist so they can get to sleep at night, otherwise they'd never sleep again. One such case by a man named Don Decker who was possessed by a demonic entity, who could make it rain inside buildings and houses, and make the rain fall from the floor to the cieling and defy the natural laws of physics and gravity.
I used to be Catholic. Not trying to offend you at all, but I don't understand how people can still believe the bible