reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Good point, Wrabbit. Exceptionalism without prior approval from
the brain doctor society is being slowly but surely redefined as
non conformance, then abberant behavior. It's about control,
always has been. If somebody out there with a couple of synapses
still firing to rub together seems to disagree with the "Way Things Are",
he's 'mentally ill' now. We can drug him up until incapable of cognitive
discernment, and give out a properly fitting curly suit.
I'm beginning to believe the three most dangerous words strung
together in English are "We know better." As in the APA Document
Commitee that allowed a flap in the media like "Whoever mistrusts
the federal government is mentally ill.."
Two plus two is the cube root of sixty-four.PERIOD. And dead
is starting to look a whole lot better than this ineptly managed
hell on Earth. Help, I'm surrounded by twits with federal grants.
And a tidbit for the conspiracy.. did the DC need to table the
release of the DSM5 twice because it was more full of logical
holes than the 4 was before the Text Revision version?? Note--
they even redacted "Emotional" out of the latter title for possibly
a CYA (?). And what would you like for topping on your tort kids?