It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by knightrider078
reply to post by Unidentified_Objective
Pro Life, Traditional family values Thoese are so evil concepts
Originally posted by knightrider078
reply to post by Unidentified_Objective
Pro Life, Traditional family values Thoese are so evil concepts
Originally posted by anarky1965
reply to post by mahatche
In my opinion, John McCain and Harry Reid are prime examples of National Reps that spout off comparable stupidity all the time.
Fuqua has been thrown into the same mix as Jon Hubbard and Loy Mauch as per this Huffington Post article.
Huffington Post
The fact that all three are from the GOP and all three from Arkansas, it stands to reason that the inflammatory writings of all three will become muddled together to the point that no one will care who said what.
Originally posted by mahatche
If anyone had any doubt that a Christian equivalent to the Taliban is out there, read this. It's incredible, he fears sharia law, but wants the be the christian version. He is anti-abortion but ok with killing teens.
Charlie Fuqua, the Republican candidate for the Arkansas House of Representatives who called for expelling Muslims from the United States in his book, also wrote in support for instituting the death penalty for "rebellious children."
In "God's Law," Fuqua's 2012 book, the candidate wrote that while parents love their children, a process could be set up to allow for the institution of the death penalty for "rebellious children," according to the Arkansas Times. Fuqua, who is anti-abortion, points out that the course of action involved in sentencing a child to death is described in the Bible and would involve judicial approval. While it is unlikely that many parents would seek to have their children killed by the government, Fuqua wrote, such power would serve as a way to stop rebellious children.
read the full story
www.huffingtonpost.com...
Page 837: Compulsory abortions would be legal
"Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society."
Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions
"One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society. "
Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn't harm livestock
"Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. "
If anyone had any doubt that a Christian equivalent to the Taliban is out there, read this
Originally posted by pyramid head
reply to post by mahatche
Great posts! This must be the childrens logic section of ATS. I'm new so you'll have to forgive me, but how is a statement made by one person the same as a group who murders people? This is by far the dumbest post I have ever read. Only in a liberals mind does this make any sense, or a child, or a liberal arts major. Your really smart though, because you dislike religion, that makes you intelligent! Thanks for the laugh.
Originally posted by pyramid head
reply to post by mahatche
Only in a liberals mind does this make any sense, or a child, or a liberal arts major. Your really smart though, because you dislike religion, that makes you intelligent! Thanks for the laugh.