It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
I am no Obama fan.....
Originally posted by butcherguy
Again.
Is it silly when the third party is an Obama bundler?
Is the non-use of CVV code verification simply an oversight or mistake made by Obama for America? Most likely, no. The Obama campaign is willing to pay millions in fees in order to accept unsecured contributions on their donation page without the CVV code.
Originally posted by Kaploink
Originally posted by butcherguy
Again.
Is it silly when the third party is an Obama bundler?
It still is silly. Did Obama buy the site and hand it over to him. Was the site a .gov site which is restricted to government agencies? A person anyplace in the world can buy a com url if it's not already owned.
Perhaps the so called bundler is hoping to gain influence, but the fact remains Obama has nothing to do with the Obama.com ownership nor what the site contains or redirects to.
Originally posted by DCPatriot
Originally posted by detachedindividual
I am no Obama fan.....
Uh-Huh! Sure you're not.
[/s]
Originally posted by butcherguy
I wish I were in the real estate business.
I see a potential bridge customer in you.edit on 8-10-2012 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)
A example would be me buying a web site called www.greatestpreachers.com and having it redirect to a normal church website. Perhaps a church of which I know and have met the preachers. Now does that make the preachers responsible for the web url www.greatestpreachers.com? No, it doesn't.
For contributions under $50, however, the campaign doesn't even have to keep track of the donor's name. It is effectively considered a "petty cash" donation. A person could theoretically make 10 $49 donations and never be reported, even though their total contributions are above the FEC's reporting threshold.
With an average donation of $53 from small donors, Obama has A LOT of donors who will never be disclosed and whose names aren't even known to the campaign. Tens of millions of dollars worth.
Originally posted by Kali74
Originally posted by DCPatriot
Originally posted by detachedindividual
I am no Obama fan.....
Uh-Huh! Sure you're not.
[/s]
Why is it that just because some people employ some rationale and reject the BS 'news' stories that come from places such as breitbart.com... that we support Obama and/or Democrats?
Originally posted by butcherguy
This thread is about Obama and his campaign funding.
The post that I made was referring to the fact that the guy that has the obama.com site that redirects to barackobama.com IS a bundler for Obama.
The Romney campaign has also been criticized for using bundlers, men and women who collect donations and “bundle” them together for the campaign, who are registered foreign agents. Ignacio E. Sanchez, one of Romney’s bundlers, is a registered foreign agent for the United Arab Emirates and a presidential candidate for the Dominican Republic. Another registered foreign agent bundling for Romney is Tom Loeffler of Akin Gump, a former congressman turned lobbyist who has represented the government of Saudi Arabia and Hong Kong. The full extent of Governor’s Romney’s use of bundlers is not known as the Romney campaign has never disclosed his bundlers despite the bipartisan call for his campaign to do so.
Posters are saying that there is no connection between Obama and the obama.com site. Just a huge coincidence I suppose?
MItt Romney's Campaign appears to be using redirects to inflate it's website traffic
For some time, the Mitt Rommey campaign was the beneficiary of a very odd domain redirect. Instead of the domain SomeECards.co sending visitors to SomeECards.com, a real website and service, those unlucky mistypers were sent to the official Mitt Romney campaign ‘About’ page
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by xuenchen
BINGO!
I wonder if the Obama Phone comes with an Obama.com app.
^^^ Sounds like a Felony to me !!
President Barack Obama’s campaign officials may have violated the Federal Election Campaign Act, which makes it illegal to knowingly solicit donations from foreigners by aggressively sending fundraising e-mails to foreign nationals. The solicitations direct to the campaign’s official donation page that does not implement proper security measures to prevent foreigners from making campaign contributions.
A Government Accountability Institute (GAI) investigation found the website Obama.com, which is not owned by the Obama campaign and has ties to a Shanghai bundler linked to the Obama campaign, redirects to the Obama campaign’s official donation page. And according to a legal analysis obtained by Breitbart News, the “campaign’s failure” to employ security measures coupled with the “considerable foreign traffic reaching its websites” warrants an investigation as to whether Obama campaign officials violated campaign finance laws.
[color=cyan]If found guilty, Obama campaign officials could face up to five years in prison and $25,000 in fines. ....
Obama Camp. Potentially Violated Fed. Laws by Solicitating Foreign Campaign Donations
.........The most revealing finding in the report is that the Obama campaign has chosen not to use industry-standard verification methods for its on-line contributions. In fact, the campaign has to pay higher fees to credit card companies because they don't use these methods. So, the campaign is paying millions of dollars for the privilege of not utilizing basic security procedures. Why would they do this?.....
Obama Campaign Has No Security to Bar Illegal Foreign Donations
Originally posted by IAMTAT
reply to post by xuenchen
BINGO!
I wonder if the Obama Phone comes with an Obama.com app.
A wireless company profiting from the so-called “Obama phone” giveaway program is run by a prominent Democratic donor whose wife has raised more than $1.5 million for the president since 2007.
One of the major providers of the free cell phones—3.8 million subscribers as of late 2011—is Miami-based TracFone Wireless, a company whose president and CEO, Frederick “F.J.” Pollak, has donated at least $156,500 to Democratic candidates and committees this cycle, including at least $50,000 to the Obama campaign. Pollak’s wife, Abigail, is a campaign bundler for Obama who has raised more than $632,000 for the president this cycle, and more than $1.5 million since 2007. She has personally contributed more than $200,000 to Democratic candidates and committees since 2008. The Pollaks hosted Obama at their Miami Beach home in June for a $40,000-per-plate fundraising dinner, and hosted a similar event with Michelle Obama in July 2008. The couple personally donated a combined $66,200 to Obama’s reelection effort that year. Visitor logs indicate that Frederick and Abigail Pollak have visited the White House seven times. In 2009, the president appointed Abigail to serve on the “Commission to Study the Potential Creation of a National Museum of the American Latino.”
The 108-page GAI report found nearly half of Congress, both political parties and presidential candidates, and third-party fundraising groups that funnel money to political parties and candidates were vulnerable to fraudulent and foreign donations. This is a bipartisan problem potentially impacting all levels of government, as those whose organizations were found to have been vulnerable include President Barack Obama, Mitt Romney, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Republican National Committee (RNC), and third-party groups like ActBlue, which funnels money to progressive politicians.
The Obama campaign even went the extra mile to raise campaign funds by failing to adopt standard protections against fraudulent and illegal giving. Federal law prohibits foreign contributions and requires the disclosure of identifying information for contributions in excess of $200. Campaigns must accordingly keep running totals for each donor and report them once they exceed $200