This is one that any sane person wouldn't touch with a 10 ft pole. GLP & Douglas Dietrich? 2 hrs? Pleeeeeeze.

However, ahem, that's not to say that there might not be some useful information here by reading between the lines. It's probably the kind of propaganda that's put out to make certain subjects sound loony that have some basis in fact.

Contrary to popular belief--or maybe due to the right hand not knowing what the left is doing--the government has been MORE active in creating a certain E.T. mythology than covering one up for the last 50+ years. Sort of.

We have been pushed a new religion. The E.T. religion. It has its Savior (E.T. will save us from nuclear/ecological destruction) its Clergy (Ufologists) and it's Prophets (Contactees and Channelers.) It's Church is ufology organizations and the internet. It even has cults.

The question is why? I believe that it's because the truth and the problem compose two parts:

1.) Our visitors are not only smart enough to mystify us, but the world governments are basically mystified, too.

2.) They probably are some form of interdimensional and that opens up a whole new set of issues/problems.

Think about the one major excuse that has been bandied about by think-tanks and certain government folk: They have often claimed that the masses couldn't handle the truth of E.T. and chaos would occur world-wide.

We know that's ridiculous…unless they are extradimensional, because then many WOULD see them as they've often been reported throughout history as denizens of the "spiritual realm." And, yeah, that could cause some problems. Capiche?

You'll be seeing me talk about electromagnetism a lot in the coming weeks. I'll put up or shut up with a thread on the subject in the near future. In the meantime start looking for yourself why the government has been SUPREMELY interested in funneling untold millions into electromagnetism/microwave radiation for the last 50 years. It's the hush-hush secret of all time. Time is running out on their secret though from what I'm seeing. We'll see.

They love it for everything from Major Weaponry to Non-Lethal Weaponry to UFOs to Mind-Control to Remote Viewing to PSI experiments and even, I believe, free energy at some point.

They took something from Tesla and they found out more than they expected.

I recently listened to James Fox's Out Of The Blue and I noticed that Ufologists like him and the cable TV shows run the same cases, the same same same cases. Rendlesham, Phoenix lights, D.C. 1952, Paul Helyer, Edgar Mitchel, Roswell of course, and touted by the same poeple over the years like Linda Howe. Like a brainwash, a corporate brainwash, like "weapons of mass destruction" on Fox News 2002.
But GUT knows I have a military case which if I -wanted- to, could push as the aliens coming here. But I feel totally completely on the fence about what is going on. I think we should not say "aliens are coming here in galactic ships" but nor should we say, "It isn't so, end of story".
The truth is, there are components that we've been overlooking, such as nano technology and humanoids that are not human. Annnnnd, the 'New' World Order.

Originally posted by gortex
I guess its part of the human psyche that we have to try and pigeon hole things whether we understand them or not .

They're bound to blow our minds in ways we can't imagine that's a given, I'm down with ya on that, too, if, of course, they are more than some Jungian-type hyper-figment, and I'm bettin' they're real at this point.

I have to at least try their M.O. out on some pigeon holes though, G-Tex. I r OCD like that.

Maybe we can narrow it down at least? I mean, I feel personal guilt for torturing the pigeons by trying to force them through the, imo, too small hole of the ETH for so many years.

Sorry to burst his bubble (which I've only just now noticed), but Mr. Dietrich's claims about knowing/working with me in the Army are a complete lie from start to finish. The same holds true for Kathy O'Brien, whose name also came up in this thread.

As a matter of practice I don't respond to nutcases, since to do so would just dignify their nonsense. Department of "If you mudwrestle with a pig, the pig has fun and you just get dirty." But when stuff like this appears on ATS, I think it should be corrected.

Michael Aquino

Originally posted by maquino
Sorry to burst his bubble (which I've only just now noticed), but Mr. Dietrich's claims about knowing/working with me in the Army are a complete lie from start to finish. The same holds true for Kathy O'Brien, whose name also came up in this thread.

As a matter of practice I don't respond to nutcases, since to do so would just dignify their nonsense. Department of "If you mudwrestle with a pig, the pig has fun and you just get dirty." But when stuff like this appears on ATS, I think it should be corrected.

Michael Aquino

Well if you are the Aquino associated with the founding of the Temple of Set I would ask for some assistance in identifying literature which would define and expound upon the symbol of the "burning man" I encounter so frequently.

One issue is distinction between enlightenment and sacrifice.

Regards,
FBB

Originally posted by The GUT I would proffer that your own fairly successful attempts at self-mythology and personal "MindWar" have brought about some of that dont'cha think?

Well, my explorations have all seemed kind of ordinary and sensible to me, and I'm always a bit surprised at how worked up some other people get about them. "Do you really do Black Magic?!" "Sure, it works and it's fun."

You've created a persona that has captured attention. Attention is "power." Personal power--will to power--is the literal intention and result of magic(k) is it not?

On my Temple of Set webpage (xeper.org/maquino) you can free-download my Black Magic, which goes into this in some detail. Generally Greater BM (GBM) is consciousness exploration, while Lesser BM (LBM) is the applied, functional, external stuff. The original 1966-75 Church of Satan was essentially focused on the latter; the Temple of Set has gone into both quite extensively since then.

Michael Aquino

Originally posted by FriedBabelBroccolisome assistance in identifying literature which would define and expound upon the symbol of the "burning man" I encounter so frequently.One issue is distinction between enlightenment and sacrifice.

The only "burning man" with which I'm familiar is that annual festival out in the desert here, which I've never attended. The symbolism of building an artificial man and then burning it on the last day actually bothers me a bit. Presumably it's a sort of nouveau artistic gesture, but to me it still has overtones of human sacrifice, which I don't like. Historically burning someone/something in effigy is a highly negative statement, and of course burning real people alive was a trademark of the original medieval witch-hunts and the Inquisition.

I don't think that today's festival=participants have this in mind, of course, but I personally can't get away from it. I'd rename it the Fluffy Bunny Festival and finish it off with a mass Tribal Stomp and lots of vegetarian munchies.

Michael Aquino