It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Thank you.

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

# David's Inches Code (Sheds DaVinci Code) Code 911

page: 1
6
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 01:55 PM
David's Inches Code
Sheds Da Vinci Code
Code 911

Hi again guys!

I've come to share something most excellent with you today.

I have discovered the code that works between Inches and Centimetres. I believe that a partial crossover between my conscious and subconscious mind has allowed me to glimpse and stumble upon a code deeply embedded within our collective mind as a species, that has shown me how The Living Father truly exists, is all loving and truly omnipotent, and how, through the Universal Language of Numbers and Geometry, he communicates to us every single moment of every single day.

So.

We all know an Inch is equal to 2.54 Centimetres.

Well...

Take any multiple of 9 Inches, let's say 81". Notice that 8 + 1 in 81 equals 9 also.

81 x 2.54 = 205.74

2 + 0 + 5 + 7 + 4 = 18

1 + 8 = 9

Try converting other multiples of 9 Inches into Centimetres and you'll see that rule at work. If you take any number of Inches, as long as it is a multiple of 9, when converted to Centimetres and having reduced the digits to a single figure as above the outcome will also always be 9. You could actually multiply ANY number by a multiple of 9 and the outcome would always reduce to 9. It is a documented attribute of 9, and there is some brilliant work at the site linked below showing far more things that will amaze.

rickzepeda.hubpages.com...

Look at the Number 9 and see an embryo, a seed just sprouting...

Moving on,

Look at the number, 2.54

2 = 2 Towers (sounds like Tau+ers, Tau as in the letter)
5 + 4 = 9
2 + 5 + 4 = 11, reduces to 2

This struck me as a little odd so I thought about it a bit more. I wondered if this might go deeper. I did a few more sums.

The values on the far right are the reduced values.

2.54 x 1 = 2.54 = 2
2.54 x 2 = 5.08 = 4
2.54 x 3 = 7.62 = 6
2.54 x 4 = 10.16 = 8
2.54 x 5 = 12.7 = 1
2.54 x 6 = 15.24 = 3
2.54 x 7 = 17.78 = 5
2.54 x 8 = 20.32 = 7
2.54 x 9 = 22.86 = 9

2.54 x 10 = 25.4 = 2
2.54 x 11 = 27.94 = 4
2.54 x 12 = 30.48 = 6
2.54 x 13 = 33.02 = 8
2.54 x 14 = 35.56 = 1
2.54 x 15 = 38.1 = 3
2.54 x 16 = 40.64 = 5
2.54 x 17 = 43.18 = 7
2.54 x 18 = 45.72 = 9
2.54 x 19 = 48.26 = 2
2.54 x 20 = 50.8 = 4

I noticed the odds and evens separated in the reduced values.

I needed to know if 2.54cm was absolutely precise. I was pretty sure that it couldn't be, I mean, how could it possibly be when Inches and Centimetres are two completely different scales? The closer you zoomed in on the division lines you'd see they wouldn't quite be level when drawn super fine. Also, 2.54 simply couldn't be accurate enough when working over long distances. Of course, the rule of reducing to 9 would still work with large multiples of 9 Inches, due to the special attributes of the Number as mentioned.

I checked the net to see what I could find on the accuracy of 2.54cm.

Most places said 2.54, but I saw one suggestion of 2.545. I checked it out.

2.545 x 1 = 2.545 = 7
2.545 x 2 = 5.09 = 5
2.545 x 3 = 7.635 = 3
2.545 x 4 = 10.18 = 1
2.545 x 5 = 12.725 = 8
2.545 x 6 = 15.27 = 6
2.545 x 7 = 17.815 = 4
2.545 x 8 = 20.36 = 2
2.545 x 9 = 22.905 = 9

I noticed odds and evens separated again, this time in reverse order. Intrigued, I looked for a more detailed conversion.

I eventually came across a suggestion of 2.5456, and that resonated with me. A slightly different pattern emerges but a continuation of the strangeness nonetheless.

2.5456 x 1 = 2.5456 = 4
2.5456 x 2 = 5.0912 = 8
2.5456 x 3 = 7.6368 = 3
2.5456 x 4 = 10.1824 = 7
2.5456 x 5 = 12.728 = 2
2.5456 x 6 = 15.2736 = 6
2.5456 x 7 = 17.8192 = 1
2.5456 x 8 = 20.3648 = 5
2.5456 x 9 = 22.9104 = 9

The next logical points would be 5 and 8 to make it 2.545658.

2.54565 x 1 = 2.54565 = 9
2.54565 x 2 = 5.0913 = 9
2.54565 x 3 = 7.63695 = 9
2.54565 x 4 = 10.1826 = 9
2.54565 x 5 = 12.72825 = 9
2.54565 x 6 = 15.2739 = 9
2.54565 x 7 = 17.81955 = 9
2.54565 x 8 = 20.3652 = 9
2.54565 x 9 = 22.91085 = 9

2.545658 x 1 = 2.545658 = 8
2.545658 x 2 = 5.091316 = 7
2.545658 x 3 = 7.636974 = 6
2.545658 x 4 = 10.182632 = 5
2.545658 x 5 = 12.72829 = 4
2.545658 x 6 = 15.273948 = 3
2.545658 x 7 = 17.819606 = 2
2.545658 x 8 = 20.365264 = 1
2.545658 x 9 = 22.910922  = 9

I've been practising sacred geometry recently and have developed an interest in clockwork and cogs (that's another story) so I recognised that 60 being the next logical addition to the decimal, also sits at the top of a clock.

2.5456586 x 1 = 2.5456586 = 5
2.5456586 x 2 = 5.0913172 = 1
2.5456586 x 3 = 7.6369758 = 6
2.5456586 x 4 = 10.1826344 = 2
2.5456586 x 5 = 12.728293 = 7
2.5456586 x 6 = 15.2739516 = 3
2.5456586 x 7 = 17.8196102 = 8
2.5456586 x 8 = 20.3652688 = 4
2.5456586 x 9 = 22.9109274 = 9

This seemed like a good way to continue so I thought about what comes after 60 on a clock. One.

2.545658601 x 1 = 2.545658601 = 6
2.545658601 x 2 = 5.091317202 = 3
2.545658601 x 3 = 7.636975803 = 9
2.545658601 x 4 = 10.182634404 = 6
2.545658601 x 5 = 12.728293005 = 3
2.545658601 x 6 = 15.273951606 = 9
2.545658601 x 7 = 17.819610207 = 6
2.545658601 x 8 = 20.365268808 = 3
2.545658601 x 9 = 22.910927409 = 9

Having just had a series of even numbers, 2.54565860 then moving into odd with 2.545658601 it seemed best to continue on with the odd numbers as per the earlier pattern generated by the obviously symbolic value of 2.54.

2.5456586013 x 1 = 2.5456586013 = 9
2.5456586013 x 2 = 5.0913172026 = 9
2.5456586013 x 3 = 7.6369758039 = 9
2.5456586013 x 4 = 10.1826344052 = 9
2.5456586013 x 5 = 12.7282930065 = 9
2.5456586013 x 6 = 15.2739516078 = 9
2.5456586013 x 7 = 17.8196102091 = 9
2.5456586013 x 8 = 20.3652688104 = 9
2.5456586013 x 9 = 22.9109274117 = 9

2.54565860135 x 1 = 2.54565860135 = 5
2.54565860135 x 2 = 5.0913172027 = 1
2.54565860135 x 3 = 7.63697580405 = 6
2.54565860135 x 4 = 10.1826344054 = 2
2.54565860135 x 5 = 12.72829300675 = 7
2.54565860135 x 6 = 15.2739516081 = 3
2.54565860135 x 7 = 17.81961020945 = 8
2.54565860135 x 8 = 20.3652688108 = 4
2.54565860135 x 9 = 22.91092741215 = 9

2.545658601357 x 1 = 2.545658601357 = 3
2.545658601357 x 2 = 5.091317202714 = 6
2.545658601357 x 3 = 7.636975804071 = 9
2.545658601357 x 4 = 10.182634405428 = 3
2.545658601357 x 5 = 12.728293006785 = 6
2.545658601357 x 6 = 15.273951608142 = 9
2.545658601357 x 7 = 17.819610209499 = 3
2.545658601357 x 8 = 20.365268810856 = 6
2.545658601357 x 9 = 22.910927412213 = 9

2.5456586013579 x 1 = 2.5456586013579 = 3
2.5456586013579 x 2 = 5.0913172027158 = 6
2.5456586013579 x 3 = 7.6369758040737 = 9
2.5456586013579 x 4 = 10.1826344054316 = 3
2.5456586013579 x 5 = 12.7282930067895 = 6
2.5456586013579 x 6 = 15.2739516081474 = 9
2.5456586013579 x 7 = 17.8196102095053 = 3
2.5456586013579 x 8 = 20.3652688108632 = 6
2.5456586013579 x 9 = 22.9109274122211 = 9

Nikola Tesla: "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe."

2.54565860135791 x 1 = 2.54565860135791 = 4
2.54565860135791 x 2 = 5.09131720271582 = 8
2.54565860135791 x 3 = 7.63697580407373 = 3
2.54565860135791 x 4 = 10.18263440543164 = 7
2.54565860135791 x 5 = 12.72829300678955 = 2
2.54565860135791 x 6 = 15.27395160814746 = 6
2.54565860135791 x 7 = 17.81961020950537 = 1
2.54565860135791 x 8 = 20.36526881086328 = 5
2.54565860135791 x 9 = 22.91092741222119 = 9

2.545658601357911 x 1 = 2.545658601357911 = 5
2.545658601357911 x 2 = 5.091317202715822 = 1
2.545658601357911 x 3 = 7.636975804073733 = 6
2.545658601357911 x 4 = 10.182634405431644 = 2
2.545658601357911 x 5 = 12.728293006789555 = 7
2.545658601357911 x 6 = 15.273951608147466 = 3
2.545658601357911 x 7 = 17.819610209505377 = 8
2.545658601357911 x 8 = 20.365268810863288 = 4
2.545658601357911 x 9 = 22.910927412221199 = 9

2.5456586013579111 x 1 = 2.5456586013579111 = 6
2.5456586013579111 x 2 = 5.0913172027158222 = 3
2.5456586013579111 x 3 = 7.6369758040737333 = 9
2.5456586013579111 x 4 = 10.1826344054316444 = 6
2.5456586013579111 x 5 = 12.7282930067895555 = 3
2.5456586013579111 x 6 = 15.2739516081474666 = 9
2.5456586013579111 x 7 = 17.8196102095053777 = 6
2.5456586013579111 x 8 = 20.3652688108632888 = 3
2.5456586013579111 x 9 = 22.9109274122211999 = 72 = 9

111 reminds me of eleventy-one in Lord of the Rings.

This is as far as most calculators go but I suspect the real figure may continue the inherent pattern and look something like this: 2.5456586013579...11131517192123252729313335373941434547495153555759...Possibly continuing 61636567697173757981838587899193959799 (to 101 decimal places) this 102 digit number reduces to 516, which reduces further to 12 and finally to 3.

Use as many decimal places as you can in your calculations, but be aware you must first check how many figures your calculator displays. It's no good almost filling the display with decimals unless you are using a very low multiple of 9, as there won't be enough spaces to display the full decimal answer, the last digits will be rounded and this will throw off the rule.

If you have noticed the number patterns in the reduced numerological values, you'll find the link below very interesting. Look at the graph!

www.scienceforums.net...

Just wait 'til I show you how the Matrix is built! That's for another thread but I'll give you a taster now.

Using just a compass and square rule (Freemason Symbol) I found a fractal pattern of 'Cogs' that gets increasingly more complicated until I suppose you might reach Perfect Circles. I believe the less 'teeth' the cog has, the lower the dimension it represents, things start to run smoother as you move up the dimensions, and time changes.

When I close my eyes I get a 'viewfinder' that looks like a Cross with rotating arms, I always wondered what and why this was and now I know. When I slip further in I get concentric rings of gold against a purple background that appear from the edges of my vision and work their way to the middle, giving the effect of moving backwards along a tunnel. It's all part of an internal compass and square. Once you begin drawing these patterns and train your eyes to see the shapes within them you will start to recognise 'The Matrix' everywhere. I always see geometric lines radiating from the Horizon. When your eyes are trained in this way and you look at nature it is easy to see how Tolkien came up with the Ents. And also what the Biblical account of the Burning Bush really means. If your eyes aren't yet able to see in this way you may want to start mastering magic eye pictures, then go outdoors and try to find natural stereograms to see what I mean.

So, using a compass, draw a circle and mark 12 points around it as a clock. Notice the word lock in clock.

If you connect every point to every other point bar those adjacent you get a 12-pointed star within a circle, two Stars of David/four equilateral triangles, three squares, and a Triple-Cross. This reminded me of the buttons on a games console. There are also hexagons and other shapes to be found.

Look at the pattern once all the straight lines are present and find the right angles. These give the sizes for new circles to be drawn. There are some interesting ratios to be found if you work in Inches. I enjoy the ratio of 111 x 160ths of an Inch. This is the infinite version of 360/250 and shows the inherent fractal nature with  1.44144144.... recurring into eternity. You might also notice something about that number if you've read the Bible. The right angle positions found earlier are also the points at which you would begin a duplicate of the whole thing. The diagrams of lines and circles linked below are incomplete but will give you an idea.

You may find it useful to separate the straight lines from the circles to see how the circles appear as donuts. If you keep the Triple-Cross radiating from the centre you will see it all rests upon a lattice of diamonds.

I'll include a basic picture with circles of sizes 1, 2 and 3. As cogs, I believe these would have 12, 24 and 36 'teeth' respectively. For some, this diagram will show enough detail to be able to work it all out, almost a formula in lines if you will.

If you look in the centre and imagine the omitted straight lines have been overlaid, you would find the numbers 1 to 9 formed perfectly within. Drawing the numbers 1 to 9 in the shortest space possible is how I came across the pattern in the beginning.

Below is a simple translation of how the pattern builds.

Also note that cogs of 12 teeth positioned at the edges of a 5-pointed star, if touching, would be locked. 5 x 12 = 60 minutes. This is the lock in clock. If they were on a 6-pointed star they would rotate, and 6 x 12 = 72 (if you look at a £2 coin you will notice those cogs are locked also, but I'll save my workings on time for another thread). Take the lock out of clock and what are you left with? C. Does this stand for Christ/Consciousness, is it representative of the Sea, or something else? Truth always transcends multiple realities so maybe it means a flood of consciousness as well as a literal flood.

Anyway, once you start drawing these it becomes apparent that although the rule is a simple one to follow, the pattern becomes extremely complicated when you try to represent it with any kind of fullness. If only I could use light itself as a pen and draw on an (almost?) infinite background I might be able to do it... I wonder who has such an ability?...

In order to show you anything approaching a full representation of this pattern, I would probably have to hand you a pearl. Jesus knew what he was talking about. I'm not going to go into how pearls form, where you find them, and why my parents decided to name me David Jones but it feels as if there is a connection there too.

This is all very odd, I don't fit any organised religion I know of (I've researched plenty) but I suppose if I had to put a label on, it'd probably have to read something like; Gnostic Christian Optic Geometer.

Until next time,

Peace

edit on 6/10/12 by iamahumandoing because: Link fixed

edit on 6/10/12 by iamahumandoing because: Close bracket

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 02:55 PM
I appreciate the effort you've put into this but honestly a lot of it seems like vague guess work and I'm just not seeing the significance. I did however find this quote to be interesting:

Nikola Tesla: "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you would have a key to the universe."

If I remember correctly Tesla was obsessed with the number three... though I'm not sure what significance 6 and 9 have, because 3 is the only prime and 6 and 9 are simply factors of 3.
edit on 6/10/2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 03:09 PM

If you check the sequence of reduced numbers you will see they are Rodin numbers. Strange seeing as its been encoded between Inches and Centimetres.

Think of the crossing of metric and imperial. Basically this shows that no matter what we try and do, everything is always accomplished in secret by the Holy Spirit through our actions, whether we intend it or not...

The Number 3 signifies providence. Like the McDonalds arches, a pair of breasts etc. Numbers are symbols. 9 is the Image of The Living Father, think embryo/seed sprouting. The number 6 is an inverted 9, also the number of Man.

Hope this helps

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 04:00 PM
It goes like this...

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 04:09 PM

Truth always transcends multiple realities so maybe it means a flood of consciousness as well as a literal flood.

Anyway, once you start drawing these it becomes apparent that although the rule is a simple one to follow, the pattern becomes extremely complicated when you try to represent it with any kind of fullness. If only I could use light itself as a pen and draw on an (almost?) infinite background I might be able to do it... I wonder who has such an ability?...

System of Truth

posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 10:59 PM

The Number 3 signifies providence.

3 Signifies System, 33 Truth.

posted on Oct, 7 2012 @ 04:17 AM

Originally posted by Americanist

The Number 3 signifies providence.

3 Signifies System, 33 Truth.

3 is also Divine Female.

posted on Oct, 7 2012 @ 02:18 PM

If you look below my name, you'll see the answer to that!

posted on Oct, 9 2012 @ 03:18 PM
One inch is 2.54cm because that is what it was defined as. Not sure where you got your ever increasing decimal numbers from but they are by definition; wrong.

posted on Oct, 28 2012 @ 08:38 PM

Originally posted by Subterranean13
One inch is 2.54cm because that is what it was defined as. Not sure where you got your ever increasing decimal numbers from but they are by definition; wrong.

How can that possibly be precise? Even by your logic inches came before centimetres so are you saying the person who invented inches decided that each one had to equal exactly 2.54cm? I am just showing the fact that it's all intelligent design here, the inch and centimetre were determined by one and the same and the answer is beautiful and inevitable. Don't shoot the messenger.

If you typed any of the numbers into a calculator you'd see how it all begins with the sign of a cross.

posted on Oct, 31 2012 @ 09:35 PM

Originally posted by iamahumandoing

Originally posted by Subterranean13
One inch is 2.54cm because that is what it was defined as. Not sure where you got your ever increasing decimal numbers from but they are by definition; wrong.

How can that possibly be precise? Even by your logic inches came before centimetres so are you saying the person who invented inches decided that each one had to equal exactly 2.54cm? I am just showing the fact that it's all intelligent design here, the inch and centimetre were determined by one and the same and the answer is beautiful and inevitable. Don't shoot the messenger.

If you typed any of the numbers into a calculator you'd see how it all begins with the sign of a cross.

No, I'm saying that after the invention of the metre, and hence centimetre, the inch is defined as being 2.54 cm. No more, no less. If you are really desperate and want to use some old definition, just remember that the definition of the metre has changed too so whenever the the inch wasn't exactly 2.54cm, the centimetre may well also have been different.

What you are doing is picking and choosing your definitions so that they fit your terrible theory. Hence it can automatically be discounted.

posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 01:42 PM

Originally posted by Subterranean13

Originally posted by iamahumandoing

Originally posted by Subterranean13
One inch is 2.54cm because that is what it was defined as. Not sure where you got your ever increasing decimal numbers from but they are by definition; wrong.

How can that possibly be precise? Even by your logic inches came before centimetres so are you saying the person who invented inches decided that each one had to equal exactly 2.54cm? I am just showing the fact that it's all intelligent design here, the inch and centimetre were determined by one and the same and the answer is beautiful and inevitable. Don't shoot the messenger.

If you typed any of the numbers into a calculator you'd see how it all begins with the sign of a cross.

No, I'm saying that after the invention of the metre, and hence centimetre, the inch is defined as being 2.54 cm. No more, no less. If you are really desperate and want to use some old definition, just remember that the definition of the metre has changed too so whenever the the inch wasn't exactly 2.54cm, the centimetre may well also have been different.

What you are doing is picking and choosing your definitions so that they fit your terrible theory. Hence it can automatically be discounted.

Ha no you seem to miss the point. I'm showing something that can neither be proved nor disproved.

What am I trying to show?

Order and beauty from what would otherwise be considered chaotic. In that I believe I have succeeded.

If you don't then that's your prerogative, but before you comment again please consider my feelings and those of the people who have starred and flagged this thread. There aren't many admittedly but their opinions are just as valid as yours or mine.

For True Enjoyment of this Thread, I Believe Faith is the Key.

Peace be to you Future Friend

posted on Nov, 1 2012 @ 10:42 PM

Originally posted by iamahumandoing
Take any multiple of 9 Inches, let's say 81". Notice that 8 + 1 in 81 equals 9 also.

Not sure if you know this or not but multiplying 9 X any number 1-10 will work like that. Actually, the easiest way to do it is with your fingers and you can quickly come up with the answer. Here is a fun little video showing it:

posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 01:45 PM

Originally posted by deathlord

Originally posted by iamahumandoing
Take any multiple of 9 Inches, let's say 81". Notice that 8 + 1 in 81 equals 9 also.

Not sure if you know this or not but multiplying 9 X any number 1-10 will work like that. Actually, the easiest way to do it is with your fingers and you can quickly come up with the answer. Here is a fun little video showing it:

You could actually multiply ANY number by a multiple of 9 and the outcome would always reduce to 9. It is a documented attribute of 9...

What I am trying to show is something else, hence why I covered the point you are making, in doing so you obviously missed the point.

new topics

top topics

6