It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
London (CNN) -- Britain's public service broadcaster, the BBC, was caught up in a growing furor Saturday over claims that a late children's TV presenter sexually abused young women and girls, sometimes on its premises, in the 1960s and 1970s.
The abuse claims, which come almost a year after presenter Jimmy Savile died, were made by five women in a documentary screened by rival broadcaster ITV Wednesday.
Originally posted by Sinny
Michael was Innocent, Savile is sa-VILE,
IMOedit on 6-10-2012 by Sinny because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Firstly, let me say I am not starting this thread for a debate on who is guilty and who is innocent. I want to use this thread to discuss how the reactions of society seemingly show how the public's perception is controlled and manipulated.
Thoughts?
Originally posted by havok
reply to post by Wonderer2012
I understand your premise.
But what would be the reason to discredit these individuals?
In other words....why did the media influence the opinion of the masses?
What was their (the medias) agenda?
Those are my questions...
Trust me, I detest networks and the propaganda they push.
I see exactly how they can influence a nation, or people.
But there has to be a reason.
Besides...
I don't care if either person was guilty or innocent.
They were never charged with a crime, everything was allegations.
Why on Earth would people care now?
To get reparations from their estates?
Alot of people go their entire lives being guilty of crimes.
They undoubtedly suffer their own personal demise.
If they never did anything then it was all show.
But:
You reap what you sow.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
Firstly, let me say I am not starting this thread for a debate on who is guilty and who is innocent. I want to use this thread to discuss how the reactions of society seemingly show how the public's perception is controlled and manipulated.
Thoughts?
What else is going on that they want us to not notice?
I find some of the stories somewhat difficult to find credible. Even poor Freddy Star is getting dragged into. Apparently one underage girls claims he tried to force himself on her while smiling of drink. He is a teetotaler.
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
That's an interesting stance because from your previous posts, I would argue you do not buy into conspiracies and have stated you find it 'difficult to find it credible'.
Originally posted by woogleuk
Some poor lass probably got nonced by Gary Glitter, and remembers seeing Savile on that day.
I think it is disgusting, the poor fellow hasn't even fully decomposed yet and already the leeches are out in full force, trying to grab what compen they can because the guy isn't here to defend himself.
He done so much for kids over the decades and he doesn't deserve his name to be dragged down like this, and as for them involving Freddie Starr?? Well, just look at the evidence they presented (written statement), that's enough to prove they (the accusers) are talking bollocks.edit on 6/10/12 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
On talking to my girlfriend, she firstly thinks it is disrespectful to look into the Saville case because he is dead. She even stated that the 'supposed victims' are coming forward to get some compensation hoping they will get paid off!
Originally posted by CX
Originally posted by Wonderer2012
On talking to my girlfriend, she firstly thinks it is disrespectful to look into the Saville case because he is dead. She even stated that the 'supposed victims' are coming forward to get some compensation hoping they will get paid off!
With all due respect to your girlfriend, it's also disrespectful to accuse people who were abused as children of being in it for the money.
I take it your girlfriend does not live near where these incidents took place? If she did, you would hear a horrifying amount of stories, from all walks of life, coming out of the woodwork....and many of these don't even want to be identified, let alone get money from it.
If i wasn't so close to someone who was directly affected by this, i could see your point, in relation to Jimmy Saville, but what i am hearing every day at the moment is just shocking. This is from people within the industry from back then, and people who were working at the establishments he raised money for.
When you speak to people face to face who experienced what he did first hand, you don't need the media to make you think anything. You tend to make your own mind up.
If anything, in the case of Jimmy Saville, you'd expect the media to hush it up, not force it on you to tell you how to think. A lot of industry hierarchy will be panicking right now.
CX.edit on 6/10/12 by CX because: (no reason given)