It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is not untrue at all. They reproduce, BUT only through heterosexual relations. Thus making a different CHOICE from their original choice. If they had any integrity whatsoever, they would stand by their original choice and have only homosexual relations. The fact that they CAN CHOOSE either action seems to contraindicate a genetic condition.
Originally posted by Annee
That is archaic and untrue in today's world.
However - - there is nothing wrong with a homosexuals reproductive system. They've been producing off-spring since the beginning of man.
But - - its wrong and unnatural for them. How would you like being forced to have gay sex to fulfill some society obligation?
Personally, I don't think a gay person would make a very good leader, but then again I could be wrong, anything is possible.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
It is not untrue at all. They reproduce, BUT only through heterosexual relations.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
It is not untrue at all. They reproduce, BUT only through heterosexual relations. Thus making a different CHOICE from their original choice. If they had any integrity whatsoever, they would stand by their original choice and have only homosexual relations. The fact that they CAN CHOOSE either action seems to contraindicate a genetic condition.
Originally posted by Annee
That is archaic and untrue in today's world.
However - - there is nothing wrong with a homosexuals reproductive system. They've been producing off-spring since the beginning of man.
But - - its wrong and unnatural for them. How would you like being forced to have gay sex to fulfill some society obligation?
As for me having homosexual relations, I would and do choose not to do so. Though, I could choose differently if I so desired. Again arguing for choice and against genetics.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
Personally, I don't think a gay person would make a very good leader, but then again I could be wrong, anything is possible.
Exactly how does being gay effect a person's leadership abilities?
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Everyone knows a gay kid can't be an eagle scout...duh....
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
No need for that. If you want to call heterosexuality a choice, go for it. That particular choice is required for continuation of the species though, . .
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by DarthMuerte
Can you show me the hetrosexual gene?
That is archaic and untrue in today's world.
However - - there is nothing wrong with a homosexuals reproductive system. They've been producing off-spring since the beginning of man.
But - - its wrong and unnatural for them. How would you like being forced to have gay sex to fulfill some society obligation?
edit on 6-10-2012 by Annee because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
No need for that. If you want to call heterosexuality a choice, go for it. That particular choice is required for continuation of the species though, . .
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by DarthMuerte
Can you show me the hetrosexual gene?
That is archaic and untrue in today's world.
However - - there is nothing wrong with a homosexuals reproductive system. They've been producing off-spring since the beginning of man.
But - - its wrong and unnatural for them. How would you like being forced to have gay sex to fulfill some society obligation?
edit on 6-10-2012 by Annee because: (no reason given)
You're bending the subject.
Did he say he wanted to force you to ensure the continuation of our species? No... He just stated a fact - Man + Man = extinction. Woman + Woman = Extinction. What he actually said was "1) put all gay men in a desert island, and put all gay women in another desert island - 2) wait 70 years 3) welcome to two - again - desert islands".
You know... its not that hard.
And stop using semantics "think - know" I mean, you can do better... like saying that the "homosexual gene is somewhere in the JUNK dna".... ok, that doesnt really do much for you when your... preference lies in something beginning with... "junk". I wouldnt even talk about it, let alone be proud of it...
See there? I can bend subjects and twist words also.
Originally posted by smyleegrl
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
Christians are supposed to pattern their lives after Jesus, right? You know, the guy who consorted with tax collectors, prostitutes, lepers, and the other dredges of society.
Pretty sure Jesus would have no problem associating with homosexuals and treating them as people.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Put a bunch of barren men and women together on a desert island, and in 70 years ... what would you get?
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Put a bunch of barren men and women together on a desert island, and in 70 years ... what would you get?
Not only thats stupid you had to say it twice!
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
Originally posted by smyleegrl
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
Christians are supposed to pattern their lives after Jesus, right? You know, the guy who consorted with tax collectors, prostitutes, lepers, and the other dredges of society.
Pretty sure Jesus would have no problem associating with homosexuals and treating them as people.
Hell I dont care if jesus himself was gay - you know... walking around with 12 men all the time does seem suspicious BUT you have the same problem as Annee there. Lets see this concept:
"You know, the guy who consorted with tax collectors, prostitutes, lepers, and the other dredges of society (...) would have no problem associating with homosexuals(...)"
What the hell...? What are you calling homosexuals? Wow... I'll just watch you two dig your own holes. This is getting great!
One says homosexuality is part of Junk and the other comes in defense saying that jesus would like gays since he liked pretty much every "dredge of society".
Wow...
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
You're bending the subject.
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
I mean, you can do better... like saying that the "homosexual gene is somewhere in the JUNK dna"....
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
I don't know if a gene is responsible but in fruit flys the gay traits can be turned on and off and in lab rats they can reverse homosexual traits making the rats heterosexual. They chalk these traits up to genetic mutations, so if a gene is involved it would have to be a gene that is defective.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
I mean, you can do better... like saying that the "homosexual gene is somewhere in the JUNK dna"....
Show me where I said that.